Suppr超能文献

大麻零售商营销策略和法规遵从:5 个美国城市零售商的监测研究。

Cannabis retailer marketing strategies and regulatory compliance: A surveillance study of retailers in 5 US cities.

机构信息

Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA; George Washington Cancer Center, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.

TSET Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.

出版信息

Addict Behav. 2023 Aug;143:107696. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2023.107696. Epub 2023 Mar 17.

Abstract

As cannabis retail expands in the US, its surveillance is crucial to inform regulations and protect consumers. This study addresses this need by conducting point-of-sale audits examining regulatory compliance (e.g., age verification, signage), advertising/promotional strategies, products, and pricing among 150 randomly-selected cannabis retailers in 5 US cities (30/city: Denver, Colorado; Seattle, Washington; Portland, Oregon; Las Vegas, Nevada; Los Angeles, California) in Summer 2022. Descriptive and bivariate analyses characterized the retailers overall and across cities. Age verification rates were high (>90%). The majority of retailers had signage indicating restricted access (e.g., no minors; 87.3%), onsite consumption (73.3%), and distribution to minors (53.3%). Retailers were likely to post warnings regarding use during pregnancy/breastfeeding (72.0%), followed by health risks (38.0%), impacts on children/youth (18.7%), and DUI (14.0%). Overall, 28.7% posted health claims, 20.7% posted youth-oriented signage, and 18.0% had youth-oriented packaging. Price promotions were prevalent, particularly price specials (75.3%), daily/weekly/monthly specials (66.7%), and membership programs (39.3%). One-fourth had signs/promotions indicating curbside delivery/pick-up (28.0%) and/or online ordering (25.3%); 64.7% promoted their website or social media page. The most potent cannabis products were most often e-liquids (38.0%) or oils (24.7%); the least potent were often edibles (53.0%). The most expensive product was often bud/flower (58.0%); the least was joints (54.0%). The vast majority (≥81%) sold vaporizers, wrapping papers, and hookah/waterpipes/bongs, and 22.6% sold CBD products. Marketing strategies differed across cities, reflecting differences in state-specific regulations and/or gaps in compliance/enforcement. Findings underscore the need for ongoing cannabis retail surveillance to inform future regulatory and enforcement efforts.

摘要

随着美国大麻零售业务的扩张,对其进行监管以制定法规并保护消费者至关重要。本研究通过对美国 5 个城市(丹佛、科罗拉多州;西雅图、华盛顿州;波特兰、俄勒冈州;拉斯维加斯、内华达州;洛杉矶、加利福尼亚州)的 150 家随机大麻零售商进行销售点审计,以满足这一需求。该审计检查了监管合规情况(例如,年龄验证、标识)、广告/促销策略、产品和价格。描述性和双变量分析总结了零售商的总体情况和各城市的情况。年龄验证率很高(>90%)。大多数零售商都有标识牌,表明限制进入(例如,未成年人不得入内;87.3%)、现场消费(73.3%)和向未成年人分发(53.3%)。零售商很可能会发布有关怀孕期间/哺乳期使用、健康风险、对儿童/青少年的影响以及酒后驾车的警告(72.0%)。总体而言,28.7%的零售商发布了健康声明,20.7%发布了针对年轻人的标识牌,18.0%的零售商采用了针对年轻人的包装。促销活动很普遍,尤其是特价(75.3%)、每日/每周/每月特价(66.7%)和会员计划(39.3%)。四分之一的零售商有表明路边交货/取货(28.0%)和/或在线订购(25.3%)的标识牌/促销活动;64.7%宣传其网站或社交媒体页面。最有效的大麻产品通常是电子烟液体(38.0%)或油(24.7%);最无效的通常是食用品(53.0%)。最昂贵的产品通常是花蕾/花朵(58.0%);最便宜的是烟卷(54.0%)。绝大多数零售商(≥81%)销售蒸发器、包装纸、水烟/水烟/水烟和 22.6%销售 CBD 产品。营销策略因城市而异,反映了州特定法规的差异和/或合规/执法方面的差距。这些发现强调了对大麻零售业务进行持续监管监测的必要性,以指导未来的监管和执法工作。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

9
Cannabis Policy in the United States: Implications for Public Health.美国的大麻政策:对公共卫生的影响。
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2021 Nov 28;2021(58):39-52. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgab016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验