Institute for Applied Mathematics and Information Technologies "E. Magenes", National Research Council, Milano, Italy.
Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, Lecce, Italy.
Front Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;11:1151009. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1151009. eCollection 2023.
The study aimed to investigate perceptions and determinants of the overall impact on life and work domains among a community of knowledge workers after 18 months of forced work from home due to the pandemic.
A cross-sectional study with a retrospective assessment was conducted early in 2022 at the National Research Council of Italy. Five single-item questions explored the perceived impact on life domain while a 7-item scale the impact on the work domain. Bivariate analyses and multivariate regressions were used to evaluate the associations between impacts and some key factors defined by 29 closed questions.
More than 95% of the 748 respondents reported a perceived change in at least one item of the life domain. For each of these items, although a large group of subjects has reported that working from home had no impact (from 27 to 55%), in the rest of the sample the positive evaluation (from 30 to 60%) clearly prevailed over the negative one. Overall, most of the subjects (64%) rated the impact on the work experience positively. Relationship with colleagues and participation in the work context were the items where the greatest number of negative rates was concentrated (27 and 25%, respectively). On the other hand, positive perceptions prevailed over both negative perceptions and lack of impact perceptions on the subjects of organizational flexibility and quality of work. The frequency of work-room sharing, home-work commute time and changes in sedentary lifestyle, have been identified as common explanatory factors of perceived impacts on both domains.
Overall, respondents reported positive rather than negative perceived impacts of forced work from home in both their lives and work. The obtained results suggest that policies to promote the physical and mental health of employees, strengthen inclusion and maintain a sense of community are necessary to improve workers' health and prevent the effects of perceived isolation on research activities.
本研究旨在调查在因疫情被迫居家办公 18 个月后,知识工作者群体对生活和工作领域整体影响的认知和决定因素。
2022 年初,在意大利国家研究委员会进行了一项横断面研究,采用回顾性评估。五个单项问题调查了生活领域的感知影响,而一个 7 项量表则调查了工作领域的影响。采用双变量分析和多变量回归来评估影响与 29 个封闭问题定义的一些关键因素之间的关联。
超过 95%的 748 名受访者报告称,生活领域至少有一项发生了变化。对于这些项目中的每一项,尽管有很大一部分人认为居家办公没有影响(27%至 55%),但在其余的样本中,积极的评价(30%至 60%)明显超过消极的评价。总体而言,大多数受访者(64%)对工作经历的影响给予了积极评价。与同事的关系和参与工作环境是负面评价率最高的两个项目(分别为 27%和 25%)。另一方面,积极的看法超过了消极的看法和缺乏影响的看法,对组织灵活性和工作质量这两个主题的看法也是如此。工作场所共享频率、家庭-工作通勤时间和久坐生活方式的变化被确定为感知对两个领域影响的共同解释因素。
总体而言,受访者报告称,居家办公对他们的生活和工作都产生了积极的而非消极的感知影响。研究结果表明,需要制定促进员工身心健康、加强包容性和保持社区意识的政策,以改善员工健康状况,防止感知孤立对研究活动的影响。