• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ADHD-社交恐惧症共病的父母态度和依恋有差异吗?

Is There a Difference in Parental Attitudes and Attachment for ADHD-Social Phobia Comorbidity?

出版信息

Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2023 Spring;34(1):24-30. doi: 10.5080/u26580.

DOI:10.5080/u26580
PMID:36970959
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10552161/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Social phobia (SP) is one the commonest of comorbid anxiety disorders seen with ADHD. It is also known that Social phobia and ADHD patients have some differences in parental attitudes and attachment styles. We aimed to investigate the effects attachment status and parental attitudes in ADHD-social phobia comorbidity.

METHOD

66 children and adolescents with ADHD were included for the study. the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version, DSM-5 November 2016-Turkish Adaptation (KSADS-PL-DSM5-T) was used for evaluating diagnosis. Socioeconomic status (SES) was scored with Hollingshead Redlich Scale. Sosyodemografic and clinical data were recorded. Adult Attachment Scale (AAS) and Parental Attitudes Research Instrument (PARI) were completed by the parents. The patients filled Kerns Security Scale (KSS). We compared the ADHD patients with and without SAD comorbidity in terms of scales used and sociodemographic-clinical variables.

RESULTS

There were no differences between ADHD + SP group and ADHD without SP group in terms of age, gender, SES, family structure and family history of diagnosed psychiatric disease (p>0.05). Rate of inattentive subtype of ADHD (p=0.05) and comorbid psychiatric disease frequency (p=0.00) was higher in ADHD+SP group compared to ADHD without social phobia group. However, the groups did not differ according to their attachment styles, their parent's attachment styles and parental attitudes (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Parental attitudes and attachment styles may not play a role in the development of SP comorbidity in children and adolescents with ADHD. Other biological and environmental factors should be kept in mind when evaluating and treating children with ADHD who have SP. Biological treatments and individualized interventions such as CBT may be chosen as a first line treatment rather than psychotherapies targeting attachment and parenting styles in those children.

摘要

目的

社交恐惧症(SP)是 ADHD 患者常见的共病焦虑障碍之一。已知社交恐惧症和 ADHD 患者在父母态度和依恋风格上存在一些差异。我们旨在研究 ADHD-社交恐惧症共病患者依恋状况和父母态度的影响。

方法

本研究纳入 66 名 ADHD 儿童和青少年患者。采用儿童青少年心境障碍和精神分裂症诊断性定式访谈表(Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version,DSM-5 November 2016-Turkish Adaptation,KSADS-PL-DSM5-T)评估诊断。采用 Hollingshead 雷德利希社会经济地位量表(Hollingshead Redlich Scale)评估社会经济地位(SES)。记录社会人口学和临床资料。由父母填写成人依恋量表(Adult Attachment Scale,AAS)和父母态度研究量表(Parental Attitudes Research Instrument,PARI)。患者填写 Kern 安全感量表(Kerns Security Scale,KSS)。比较 ADHD 患者伴或不伴 SAD 共病在使用量表和社会人口学-临床变量方面的差异。

结果

ADHD+SP 组和 ADHD 无 SP 组在年龄、性别、SES、家庭结构和诊断性精神疾病家族史方面无差异(p>0.05)。ADHD+SP 组注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)亚型发生率(p=0.05)和共病精神疾病频率(p=0.00)高于 ADHD 无社交恐惧症组。然而,两组在依恋模式、父母依恋模式和父母态度方面没有差异(p>0.05)。

结论

在 ADHD 儿童和青少年中,父母态度和依恋模式可能不是 SP 共病发展的原因。在评估和治疗伴有 SP 的 ADHD 儿童时,应考虑其他生物和环境因素。对于这些儿童,生物治疗和个性化干预,如 CBT,可能是首选治疗方法,而不是针对依恋和养育方式的心理治疗。

相似文献

1
Is There a Difference in Parental Attitudes and Attachment for ADHD-Social Phobia Comorbidity?ADHD-社交恐惧症共病的父母态度和依恋有差异吗?
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2023 Spring;34(1):24-30. doi: 10.5080/u26580.
2
Self esteem and clinical features in a clinical sample of children with ADHD and social anxiety disorder.注意自尊和临床特征在 ADHD 和社交焦虑障碍的临床样本儿童中。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2021 May;75(4):286-291. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2020.1850857. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
Clinical Effects of ADHD Subtypes in Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder.社交焦虑障碍患者注意缺陷多动障碍亚型的临床疗效。
J Atten Disord. 2019 Oct;23(12):1464-1469. doi: 10.1177/1087054715617533. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
4
Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents who have a diagnosis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍的儿童和青少年的健康相关生活质量。
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e541-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0844.
5
[Association Between Parenting Styles and Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder].[养育方式与注意力缺陷多动障碍症状之间的关联]
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2017 Spring;28(1):25-32.
6
Predominantly Inattentive Type of ADHD is Associated With Social Anxiety Disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍的主要注意力不集中型与社交焦虑障碍有关。
J Atten Disord. 2015 Oct;19(10):856-64. doi: 10.1177/1087054714533193. Epub 2014 May 9.
7
Attention deficit and hyperactivity in social anxiety disorder: relationship with trauma history and impulsivity.社交焦虑障碍中的注意力缺陷与多动:与创伤史及冲动性的关系。
Atten Defic Hyperact Disord. 2016 Jun;8(2):95-100. doi: 10.1007/s12402-016-0189-2. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Psychiatric comorbidity in Korean children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: psychopathology according to subtype.患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的韩国儿童和青少年的精神共病:根据亚型的精神病理学
Yonsei Med J. 2006 Feb 28;47(1):113-21. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2006.47.1.113.
9
Posttraumatic stress disorder in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: clinical features and familial transmission.成人注意缺陷多动障碍中的创伤后应激障碍:临床特征和家族传递。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;74(3):e197-204. doi: 10.4088/JCP.12m07698.
10
The Presence of Childhood Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder May Be Associated With Interpersonal Sensitivity in Patients With Social Anxiety Disorder.儿童注意力缺陷/多动障碍的存在可能与社交焦虑障碍患者的人际敏感性有关。
J Psychiatr Pract. 2017 Jul;23(4):254-259. doi: 10.1097/PRA.0000000000000246.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship of Theory of Mind and Attachment Characteristics with Disease Severity in Social Anxiety Disorder.社交焦虑障碍中心理理论和依恋特征与疾病严重程度的关系
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2021 Jan 16;58(1):63-67. doi: 10.29399/npa.27169. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Relationships Between Theory of Mind (ToM) and Attachment Properties in Adolescent with Social Axiety Disorder.社交焦虑障碍青少年的心理理论(ToM)与依恋特性之间的关系
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2020 Jan 21;57(1):65-70. doi: 10.29399/npa.24757. eCollection 2020 Mar.
3
Intrinsic functional connectivity in social anxiety disorder with and without comorbid attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.社交焦虑障碍伴或不伴共病注意缺陷多动障碍的内在功能连接。
Brain Res. 2019 Nov 1;1722:146364. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146364. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
4
[Reliability and Validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version, DSM-5 November 2016-Turkish Adaptation (K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T)].《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表(目前及终生版),DSM - 5(2016年11月) - 土耳其语改编版(K - SADS - PL - DSM - 5 - T)》的信效度
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2019 Spring;30(1):42-50.
5
Depression with or without comorbid social anxiety: Is attachment the culprit?伴或不伴共病社交焦虑的抑郁症:依恋是罪魁祸首吗?
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Nov;269:86-92. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
6
Parenting style and mental disorders in a nationally representative sample of US adolescents.美国家庭青少年代表性样本中的养育方式与精神障碍。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Jan;53(1):11-20. doi: 10.1007/s00127-017-1435-4. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
7
Extended-release methylphenidate monotherapy in patients with comorbid social anxiety disorder and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: retrospective case series.合并社交焦虑障碍和成人注意力缺陷多动障碍患者的缓释哌甲酯单药治疗:回顾性病例系列
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2017 Nov;7(11):241-247. doi: 10.1177/2045125317714193. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
8
A systematic review of adult attachment and social anxiety.成人依恋与社交焦虑的系统综述。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Mar 15;211:44-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.12.020. Epub 2016 Dec 19.
9
[Maternal bonding and infant attachment in women with and without social phobia].[有社交恐惧症和无社交恐惧症女性的母婴联结与婴儿依恋]
Z Kinder Jugendpsychiatr Psychother. 2017 Jan;45(1):49-57. doi: 10.1024/1422-4917/a000454. Epub 2016 Jul 18.
10
The etiology of social anxiety disorder: An evidence-based model.社交焦虑障碍的病因:基于证据的模型。
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Nov;86:50-67. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Jul 1.