• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作回旋余地量表:健康相关工作灵活性和弹性的自评测量的初步评估。

The Job Leeway Scale: Initial Evaluation of a Self-report Measure of Health-Related Flexibility and Latitude at Work.

机构信息

University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.

University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC, USA.

出版信息

J Occup Rehabil. 2023 Sep;33(3):581-591. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10095-6. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

DOI:10.1007/s10926-023-10095-6
PMID:36971990
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10040912/
Abstract

Purpose Evidence suggests that workers manage health-related challenges at work, in part, by using available leeway to perform work differently. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Job Leeway Scale (JLS), a new 18-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess worker perceptions of available flexibility and latitude to manage health-related challenges at work. Methods Workers seeking assistance for workplace difficulties due to chronic medical conditions (n = 119, 83% female, median age = 49) completed the JLS along with other workplace and health measures. Construct validity was assessed using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and concurrent validity was assessed by associations with related measures. Results Mean item scores ranged from 2.13 to 4.16 within a possible range of 0-6. The EFA supported three underlying factors: organizational leeway (9 items), task leeway (6 items), and staffing leeway (3 items). Internal consistency (alpha) ranged from 0.78 to 0.91 for subscale scores and 0.94 for the total score. The JLS showed moderate correlations with other work outcome measures including work fatigue, self-efficacy, engagement, and productivity. Conclusion The JLS is a promising new measure with initial support for its reliability and validity to assess worker beliefs of available flexibility to manage health symptoms at work, and this construct may have organizational implications for worker support and accommodation.

摘要

目的

有证据表明,员工通过利用可用的回旋余地以不同的方式完成工作,从而在一定程度上应对与健康相关的工作挑战。本研究旨在评估工作回旋余地量表(JLS)的信度和效度,该量表是一种新的 18 项自我报告问卷,旨在评估员工对工作中管理与健康相关挑战的可用灵活性和回旋余地的感知。

方法

因慢性疾病而在工作场所遇到困难寻求帮助的员工(n=119,83%为女性,中位数年龄为 49 岁)完成了 JLS 以及其他工作场所和健康相关的测量。使用探索性因素分析(EFA)评估结构效度,并通过与相关测量的关联评估同时效度。

结果

在 0-6 的可能范围内,平均项目得分范围为 2.13 到 4.16。EFA 支持三个潜在因素:组织回旋余地(9 项)、任务回旋余地(6 项)和人员配置回旋余地(3 项)。子量表得分的内部一致性(alpha)范围为 0.78 到 0.91,总分为 0.94。JLS 与其他工作结果测量指标(包括工作疲劳、自我效能、参与度和生产力)呈中度相关。

结论

JLS 是一种有前途的新测量工具,初步支持其可靠性和有效性,可用于评估员工对管理工作中健康症状的可用灵活性的信念,这一概念可能对员工支持和适应具有组织意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/10495490/ef177cefc081/10926_2023_10095_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/10495490/ef177cefc081/10926_2023_10095_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/10495490/ef177cefc081/10926_2023_10095_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Job Leeway Scale: Initial Evaluation of a Self-report Measure of Health-Related Flexibility and Latitude at Work.工作回旋余地量表:健康相关工作灵活性和弹性的自评测量的初步评估。
J Occup Rehabil. 2023 Sep;33(3):581-591. doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10095-6. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
The Job Accommodation Scale (JAS): psychometric evaluation of a new measure of employer support for temporary job modifications.工作调整量表(JAS):对雇主支持临时工作调整新测量方法的心理测量评估
J Occup Rehabil. 2014 Dec;24(4):755-65. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9508-7.
3
Manage at work: a randomized, controlled trial of a self-management group intervention to overcome workplace challenges associated with chronic physical health conditions.工作中的管理:一项自我管理小组干预的随机对照试验,以克服与慢性身体健康状况相关的工作场所挑战。
BMC Public Health. 2014 May 28;14:515. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-515.
4
Emergency healthcare worker sleep, fatigue, and alertness behavior survey (SFAB): development and content validation of a survey tool.急诊医护人员睡眠、疲劳及警觉行为调查(SFAB):一种调查工具的开发与内容效度验证
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Dec;73:399-411. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.09.028. Epub 2014 Oct 15.
5
The development and initial validation of a new working time scale for full-time workers with non-standard schedules.新的非标准工时制全职劳动者工作时间量表的制定与初步验证。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Aug 20;22(1):1586. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13963-7.
6
Psychometric properties of the French version of the Karasek Job Content Questionnaire: a study of the scales of decision latitude, psychological demands, social support, and physical demands in the GAZEL cohort.Karasek工作内容问卷法语版的心理测量学特性:GAZEL队列中决策自由度、心理需求、社会支持和身体需求量表的研究
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2002 Mar;75(3):129-44. doi: 10.1007/s004200100270.
7
Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Reliability, and Validity of the Persian Version of the Coping Strategies Questionnaire for Iranian People With Nonspecific Chronic Neck Pain.伊朗非特异性慢性颈痛人群应对策略问卷波斯文版的验证性因子分析、信度和效度。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2021 Jan;44(1):72-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
8
A measure to assess the workplace well-being of psychological practitioners.一种评估心理从业者工作场所幸福感的方法。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jan;27(1):11-23. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2401. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
9
Transcultural validation of the return-to-work self-efficacy scale in Korean patients with work-related injuries.跨文化验证与韩国工作相关伤害患者工作自信心量表。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):844. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08979-w.
10
Development of the self-efficacy for tinnitus management questionnaire.耳鸣管理自我效能问卷的编制
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Jul-Aug;22(7):424-40. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.22.7.4.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic Health Conditions in the Workplace: Work Stressors and Supportive Supervision, Work Design, and Programs.工作场所中的慢性健康状况:工作压力源与支持性监督、工作设计及项目
Occup Health Sci. 2024;8(2):233-241. doi: 10.1007/s41542-024-00192-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Employer Perspectives on Their Supportive Role in Accommodating Workers with Disabilities to Promote Sustainable RTW: A Qualitative Study.探索雇主对其在为残疾工人提供便利以促进可持续重返工作岗位方面支持作用的看法:一项定性研究
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Mar;32(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-10019-2. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
2
Predictors of return to work for people on sick leave with common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.常见精神障碍患者休病假后重返工作岗位的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 Sep;95(7):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01827-3. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Preferences for work arrangements: A discrete choice experiment.
工作安排偏好:离散选择实验。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 12;16(7):e0254483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254483. eCollection 2021.
4
A Worksite Self-management Program for Workers with Chronic Health Conditions Improves Worker Engagement and Retention, but not Workplace Function.工作场所慢性病患者自我管理项目可提高员工敬业度和留用率,但对工作场所功能无影响。
J Occup Rehabil. 2022 Mar;32(1):77-86. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09983-6. Epub 2021 May 13.
5
Disclosure, Privacy and Workplace Accommodation of Episodic Disabilities: Organizational Perspectives on Disability Communication-Support Processes to Sustain Employment.间歇性残疾的披露、隐私和工作场所适应:组织对残疾沟通支持过程的看法——以维持就业。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Mar;31(1):153-165. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09901-2.
6
Temporal leeway: can it help to reduce biomechanical load for older workers performing repetitive light assembly tasks?时间宽裕度:对于从事重复性轻装配任务的老年工人来说,它有助于减轻生物力学负荷吗?
Appl Ergon. 2020 Jul;86:103081. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103081. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
7
Workers Age 55 and over Working with Pain. A Descriptive Interpretive Study.55 岁及以上有疼痛的工人。描述性解释性研究。
J Occup Rehabil. 2020 Jun;30(2):211-220. doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09865-y.
8
Gender Differences in Perceived Workplace Flexibility Among Older Workers in the Netherlands: A Brief Report.性别差异在感知工作场所的灵活性在荷兰的老年工人:一个简短的报告。
J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Aug;39(8):915-921. doi: 10.1177/0733464818800651. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
Work disability in the United States, 1968-2015: Prevalence, duration, recovery, and trends.1968 - 2015年美国的工作残疾情况:患病率、持续时间、康复情况及趋势
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Dec 26;4:126-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.12.006. eCollection 2018 Apr.
10
Is There a Downside of Job Accommodations? An Employee Perspective on Individual Change Processes.工作调整有弊端吗?员工对个人变革过程的看法。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 20;8:1536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01536. eCollection 2017.