• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

刻板印象改变的结构学习原则。

Structure learning principles of stereotype change.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Center for Brains, Minds, and Machines, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1273-1293. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02252-y. Epub 2023 Mar 27.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-023-02252-y
PMID:36973602
Abstract

Why, when, and how do stereotypes change? This paper develops a computational account based on the principles of structure learning: stereotypes are governed by probabilistic beliefs about the assignment of individuals to groups. Two aspects of this account are particularly important. First, groups are flexibly constructed based on the distribution of traits across individuals; groups are not fixed, nor are they assumed to map on to categories we have to provide to the model. This allows the model to explain the phenomena of group discovery and subtyping, whereby deviant individuals are segregated from a group, thus protecting the group's stereotype. Second, groups are hierarchically structured, such that groups can be nested. This allows the model to explain the phenomenon of subgrouping, whereby a collection of deviant individuals is organized into a refinement of the superordinate group. The structure learning account also sheds light on several factors that determine stereotype change, including perceived group variability, individual typicality, cognitive load, and sample size.

摘要

刻板印象为什么会改变?又是在何时以及如何改变?本文基于结构学习原理,提出了一种计算方法:刻板印象是由关于个体在群体中分配的概率信念所决定的。该方法有两个特别重要的方面。首先,群体是根据个体之间的特征分布灵活构建的;群体不是固定的,也不假定与我们必须提供给模型的类别相对应。这使得模型能够解释群体发现和细分的现象,即异常个体与群体分离,从而保护群体的刻板印象。其次,群体是分层结构的,因此群体可以嵌套。这使得模型能够解释亚群的现象,即一群异常个体被组织成对上级群体的细化。结构学习方法还解释了几个决定刻板印象变化的因素,包括感知的群体可变性、个体典型性、认知负荷和样本大小。

相似文献

1
Structure learning principles of stereotype change.刻板印象改变的结构学习原则。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1273-1293. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02252-y. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
2
The power of the unexpected: Prediction errors enhance stereotype-based learning.意外的力量:预测误差增强基于刻板印象的学习。
Cognition. 2023 Jun;235:105386. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105386. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice.社会刻板印象与偏见的发展性群体间理论。
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006;34:39-89. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2.
4
When exceptions prove the rule: how extremity of deviance determines the impact of deviant examples on stereotypes.当例外证实规则时:越轨行为的极端程度如何决定异常示例对刻板印象的影响。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997 May;72(5):965-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.72.5.965.
5
Perceived consensus influences intergroup behavior and stereotype accessibility.感知到的共识会影响群体间行为和刻板印象的可及性。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Apr;80(4):645-54.
6
Maintaining stereotypes in the face of disconfirmation: constructing grounds for subtyping deviants.面对反证时维持刻板印象:为偏离者构建分类依据。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Apr;68(4):565-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.4.565.
7
Ethnicity-related stereotypes and their impacts on medical students: A critical narrative review of health professions education literature.种族相关的刻板印象及其对医学生的影响:对健康专业教育文献的批判性叙述性综述。
Med Teach. 2022 Sep;44(9):986-996. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2051464. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
8
In what sense are prejudicial beliefs personal? The importance of an in-group's shared stereotypes.偏见性信念在何种意义上是个人的?内群体共享刻板印象的重要性。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2000 Mar;39 ( Pt 1):45-63. doi: 10.1348/014466600164327.
9
Exaggerating differences back and forth: Two levels of intergroup accentuation.夸大差异的来回摆动:群体间凸显的两个层次。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2024 Apr;63(2):708-722. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12699. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
10
When stereotype knowledge prevents retrieval-induced forgetting.当刻板印象知识阻止提取诱发遗忘时。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2009 May;131(1):63-71. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Increased complexity of social category markers leads to diverse rule-based categorizations and reduced intergroup bias.社会类别标记复杂性的增加导致了基于规则的多样化分类,并减少了群体间偏见。
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jul;292(2051):20250659. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2025.0659. Epub 2025 Jul 30.
2
Humans learn generalizable representations through efficient coding.人类通过高效编码学习可泛化的表征。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 29;16(1):3989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58848-6.
3
Islamic law perspectives and social experiences on stigma toward disabled people in Indonesia.

本文引用的文献

1
Normative accounts of illusory correlations.规范性解释错觉相关。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Oct;128(5):856-878. doi: 10.1037/rev0000273. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
2
Narratives Shape Cognitive Representations of Immigrants and Immigration-Policy Preferences.叙事塑造了对移民和移民政策偏好的认知表现。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Feb;32(2):135-152. doi: 10.1177/0956797620963610. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
3
Social structure learning in human anterior insula.人类前脑岛的社会结构学习。
印度尼西亚关于对残疾人污名化的伊斯兰法律观点与社会经验。
Front Sociol. 2025 Mar 12;10:1479243. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1479243. eCollection 2025.
4
Asymmetric cognitive learning mechanisms underlying the persistence of intergroup bias.群体间偏见持续存在背后的不对称认知学习机制。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Feb 15;2(1):14. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00061-0.
5
Facial misfits accelerate stereotype-based associative learning.面部不协调会加速基于刻板印象的联想学习。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):19320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67770-8.
6
The Role of Predictions, Their Confirmation, and Reward in Maintaining the Self-Concept.预测、预测的证实以及奖励在维持自我概念中的作用。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Mar 24;16:824085. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.824085. eCollection 2022.
Elife. 2020 Feb 18;9:e53162. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53162.
4
The Psychology of Motivated versus Rational Impression Updating.动机驱动与理性更新印象的心理学。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
5
An information sampling explanation for the in-group heterogeneity effect.群体内异质性效应的信息取样解释。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Jan;127(1):47-73. doi: 10.1037/rev0000160. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
6
Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018.性别刻板印象已经发生了变化:1946 年至 2018 年美国民意调查的跨时间元分析。
Am Psychol. 2020 Apr;75(3):301-315. doi: 10.1037/amp0000494. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
7
The rationality of illusory correlation.错觉相关的合理性。
Psychol Rev. 2019 Apr;126(3):437-450. doi: 10.1037/rev0000130. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
8
Discovering social groups via latent structure learning.通过潜在结构学习发现社会群体。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Dec;147(12):1881-1891. doi: 10.1037/xge0000470. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
9
Social norm perception in groups with outliers.群体中异常值的社会规范感知。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Sep;146(9):1342-1359. doi: 10.1037/xge0000336. Epub 2017 Jul 6.
10
The computational nature of memory modification.记忆修改的计算本质。
Elife. 2017 Mar 15;6:e23763. doi: 10.7554/eLife.23763.