• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

了解新加坡女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:一种定性方法。

Understanding Barriers and Facilitators of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Approach.

机构信息

Health Systems and Behavioral Sciences Domain, Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore.

National University Polyclinics, National University Health System, Singapore College of Family Physicians, Singapore.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):889-895. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.889.

DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.889
PMID:36974542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10334070/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening services among women in Singapore remains inadequate. Little is known about how gender norms influence women's decision to undergo these screening services in a multi-ethnic Asian context. This research aimed to explore how gender-based qualitative factors influence women's decision to screen.

METHODS

Qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interviews from 40 racially diverse women aged 25 and above who had visited polyclinics for their chronic disease management. Women were recruited using a purposive maximum variation sampling strategy to ensure representation of their views from the three major ethnic groups and based on inclusion criteria. Interviews were conducted either face-to-face or via telephone call. Interviews were audiotaped and lasted 30 minutes on average. Interviews were conducted until data saturation was reached. The data was transcribed and analysed thematically.

RESULTS

Gender norms and gender non-concordance with the healthcare professionals did not inhibit women from undergoing breast and cervical cancer screening services to a large extent. Women were empowered and had a central role in decision-making for screening services. Healthcare initiatives such as subsidies and mobile health applications facilitated the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening services but can be improved further. Some of the barriers reported by Malay Muslims were not dissimilar to previous qualitative studies with women in this ethnic and religious group.

CONCLUSION

Gender socialisation, empowerment, and healthcare initiatives did not inhibit our study participants' decision to undergo breast and cervical cancer screening services. However, new initiatives and strengthening of the existing healthcare initiatives are needed to overcome any remnants of gender-related nuances and convert non-doers into doers.

摘要

目的

新加坡女性对乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查服务的接受率仍然不足。在多族裔亚洲背景下,性别规范如何影响女性接受这些筛查服务的决策,这方面的了解甚少。本研究旨在探讨基于性别的定性因素如何影响女性的筛查决策。

方法

使用半结构式访谈,从 40 名年龄在 25 岁及以上、曾因慢性病管理而到诊所就诊的不同种族的女性中收集定性数据。采用有目的的最大变异抽样策略招募女性,以确保从三大族裔群体中代表她们的观点,并根据纳入标准进行招募。访谈以面对面或电话方式进行。访谈进行录音,平均持续 30 分钟。访谈一直持续到达到数据饱和。将数据转录并进行主题分析。

结果

性别规范和与医疗保健专业人员的性别不一致在很大程度上并没有阻止女性接受乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查服务。女性被赋予权力,并在筛查服务的决策中发挥核心作用。医疗保健举措,如补贴和移动健康应用程序,促进了乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查服务的普及,但可以进一步改进。马来穆斯林女性报告的一些障碍与该族裔和宗教群体中之前的女性定性研究没有太大区别。

结论

性别社会化、赋权和医疗保健举措并没有阻止我们的研究参与者接受乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查服务的决定。然而,需要新的举措和加强现有的医疗保健举措,以克服任何与性别相关的细微差别,并将未使用者转变为使用者。

相似文献

1
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Approach.了解新加坡女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:一种定性方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):889-895. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.889.
2
Breast and cervical cancer screening for women with physical disabilities: A qualitative study of experiences and barriers.身体残疾女性的乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查:一项关于经验和障碍的定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Sep;75(9):1976-1986. doi: 10.1111/jan.14048. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
3
Sources of breast and cervical cancer information for Hmong women and men.针对苗族女性和男性的乳腺癌与宫颈癌信息来源。
Women Health. 2013;53(5):468-78. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2013.796305.
4
Korean American women's beliefs about breast and cervical cancer and associated symbolic meanings.韩裔美国女性对乳腺癌和宫颈癌的信念及相关象征意义。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 May;34(3):713-20. doi: 10.1188/07.ONF.713-720.
5
The influence of Malay cultural beliefs on breast cancer screening and genetic testing: A focus group study.马来族文化信仰对乳腺癌筛查和基因检测的影响:一项焦点小组研究。
Psychooncology. 2018 Dec;27(12):2855-2861. doi: 10.1002/pon.4902. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
6
"Cervical cancer screening: awareness is not enough". Understanding barriers to screening among women in West Cameroon-a qualitative study using focus groups."宫颈癌筛查:仅有意识是不够的"。了解喀麦隆西部妇女筛查障碍的定性研究:使用焦点小组。
Reprod Health. 2021 Jul 9;18(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01186-9.
7
Multi-level determinants of breast cancer screening among Malay-Muslim women in Singapore: a sequential mixed-methods study.新加坡马来穆斯林妇女乳腺癌筛查的多层面决定因素:一项序贯混合方法研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01972-y.
8
A reproductive justice approach to understanding women's experiences with HPV and cervical cancer prevention.从生殖公正角度理解女性 HPV 和宫颈癌预防的经验。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jul;232:289-297. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 10.
9
Barriers to cervical cancer screening experienced by lesbian women: a qualitative study.女同性恋者在宫颈癌筛查中遇到的障碍:一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2016 Dec;25(23-24):3643-3651. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12947. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
10
A systematic review of interventions to increase breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Asian women.一项系统评价:干预措施对提高亚洲女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查参与率的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 7;12:413. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-413.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators of pap-smear test uptake in Asia: a systematic review.亚洲地区子宫颈抹片检查接受情况的障碍与促进因素:一项系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 27;25(1):1961. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22876-0.
2
Do women with a history of breast cancer recommend risk-based breast cancer screening? An in-depth interview study.有乳腺癌病史的女性会推荐基于风险的乳腺癌筛查吗?一项深入访谈研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 22;16:1414099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414099. eCollection 2025.
3
Facilitators and Barriers to Cancer Screening Participation Across Southeastic Asia: A Scoping Review.东南亚地区癌症筛查参与的促进因素和障碍:一项范围综述
Psychooncology. 2025 Apr;34(4):e70139. doi: 10.1002/pon.70139.
4
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
5
Exploring Factors Influencing Cervical Cancer Screening Participation among Singaporean Women: A Social Ecological Approach.探索影响新加坡女性宫颈癌筛查参与率的因素:一种社会生态方法。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Oct 14;16(20):3475. doi: 10.3390/cancers16203475.
6
Bridging the gap in cervical cancer screening for underserved communities: MCED and the promise of future technologies.弥合服务不足社区宫颈癌筛查的差距:分子癌症早检及未来技术的前景
Front Oncol. 2024 Jul 29;14:1407008. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1407008. eCollection 2024.
7
Association between multiple dimensions of access to care and cervical cancer screening among Kenyan women: a cross-sectional analysis of the Demographic Health Survey.肯尼亚女性获得医疗服务的多个维度与宫颈癌筛查之间的关联:一项基于人口健康调查的横断面分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jun 14;24(1):731. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11169-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Qualitative factors influencing breast and cervical cancer screening in women: A scoping review.影响女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的定性因素:一项范围综述。
Prev Med Rep. 2022 May 13;27:101816. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101816. eCollection 2022 Jun.
2
Challenges and opportunities for breast cancer early detection among rural dwelling women in Segamat District, Malaysia: A qualitative study.马来西亚士古来区农村女性乳腺癌早期检测的挑战与机遇:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 May 20;17(5):e0267308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267308. eCollection 2022.
3
Promoting Health Literacy About Cancer Screening Among Muslim Immigrants in Canada: Perspectives of Imams on the Role They Can Play in Community.提高加拿大穆斯林移民对癌症筛查的健康素养:伊玛目对其在社区中所能发挥作用的看法
J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec;13:21501319211063051. doi: 10.1177/21501319211063051.
4
Role of Religious Leaders in COVID-19 Prevention: A Community-Level Prevention Model in Sri Lanka.宗教领袖在 COVID-19 预防中的作用:斯里兰卡的社区级预防模式。
J Relig Health. 2022 Feb;61(1):687-702. doi: 10.1007/s10943-021-01463-8. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
5
Cancer Screening Knowledge and Behavior in a Multi-Ethnic Asian Population: The Singapore Community Health Study.多民族亚洲人群的癌症筛查知识与行为:新加坡社区健康研究
Front Oncol. 2021 Aug 12;11:684917. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.684917. eCollection 2021.
6
Women's Usage Behavior and Perceived Usefulness with Using a Mobile Health Application for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Mixed-Methods Study.女性使用移动健康应用程序进行妊娠期糖尿病管理的行为和感知有用性:混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 21;18(12):6670. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18126670.
7
Breast Cancer Information Behaviours and Needs among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Study.新加坡女性的乳腺癌信息行为和需求:一项定性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):1767-1774. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1767.
8
Barriers to and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening among Women in Southeast Asia: A Systematic Review.东南亚国家妇女宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 26;18(9):4586. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094586.
9
Gender norms and social norms: differences, similarities and why they matter in prevention science.性别规范和社会规范:差异、相似之处,以及它们在预防科学中的重要性。
Sociol Health Illn. 2020 Feb;42(2):407-422. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13008. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
10
Gender inequality and restrictive gender norms: framing the challenges to health.性别不平等和限制性别规范:健康面临的挑战。
Lancet. 2019 Jun 15;393(10189):2440-2454. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X. Epub 2019 May 30.