• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Breast Cancer Information Behaviours and Needs among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Study.新加坡女性的乳腺癌信息行为和需求:一项定性研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):1767-1774. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1767.
2
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Approach.了解新加坡女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:一种定性方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):889-895. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.889.
3
Ethnic differences in breast cancer prevention information-seeking among rural women: will provider mobile messages work?农村女性乳腺癌预防信息寻求方面的种族差异:医疗服务提供者的手机信息会有效果吗?
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Sep;29(3):541-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0576-8.
4
Sources of breast and cervical cancer information for Hmong women and men.针对苗族女性和男性的乳腺癌与宫颈癌信息来源。
Women Health. 2013;53(5):468-78. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2013.796305.
5
Multi-level determinants of breast cancer screening among Malay-Muslim women in Singapore: a sequential mixed-methods study.新加坡马来穆斯林妇女乳腺癌筛查的多层面决定因素:一项序贯混合方法研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2022 Sep 19;22(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01972-y.
6
[Knowledge of women and men about breast cancer prevention].[女性和男性对乳腺癌预防的了解]
Ginekol Pol. 2013 Feb;84(2):116-25. doi: 10.17772/gp/1551.
7
What women want: patient recommendations for improving access to breast and cervical cancer screening and follow-up.女性想要什么:关于改善乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查及后续跟进可及性的患者建议。
Womens Health Issues. 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):511-8. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2014.06.011.
8
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
9
Efficacy of a simple, low-cost educational intervention in improving knowledge about risks and benefits of screening mammography.一项简单、低成本的教育干预措施在提高乳腺钼靶筛查风险和益处相关知识方面的效果。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2006 Jun;81(6):783-91. doi: 10.4065/81.6.783.
10
Association Between Online Information-Seeking and Adherence to Guidelines for Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening.在线信息搜索与乳腺癌和前列腺癌筛查指南依从性的关联。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Apr 19;15:E45. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170147.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing critical thinking and decision-making skills for cancer information: the Informed Health Choice-Cancer online learning resource.培养癌症信息的批判性思维和决策技能:明智健康选择 - 癌症在线学习资源。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01874-6.
2
Do women with a history of breast cancer recommend risk-based breast cancer screening? An in-depth interview study.有乳腺癌病史的女性会推荐基于风险的乳腺癌筛查吗?一项深入访谈研究。
Front Psychol. 2025 Apr 22;16:1414099. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1414099. eCollection 2025.
3
Information needs for cancer screening and associated factors of information-seeking behaviour: a qualitative systematic review.癌症筛查的信息需求及信息寻求行为的相关因素:一项定性系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):3606. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21096-2.
4
Understanding Barriers and Facilitators of Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Approach.了解新加坡女性乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:一种定性方法。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2023 Mar 1;24(3):889-895. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2023.24.3.889.
5
What are the views of three key stakeholder groups on extending the breast screening interval for low-risk women? A secondary qualitative analysis.三个关键利益相关者群体对延长低危女性乳房筛查间隔的看法是什么?二次定性分析。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3287-3296. doi: 10.1111/hex.13637. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
6
Ethnic predisposition, risk factors and breast cancer presentation; a 10-year data. Single centered prospective cohort study from Karachi.种族易感性、风险因素与乳腺癌表现;一项为期10年的数据研究。来自卡拉奇的单中心前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022 Sep 9;82:104612. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104612. eCollection 2022 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Media Complementarity and Health Information Acquisition: A Cross-sectional Analysis of the 2017 HINTS-China Survey.媒体互补性与健康信息获取:2017 年 HINTS-China 调查的横断面分析。
J Health Commun. 2020 Apr 2;25(4):291-300. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1746868. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
2
Cancer-Related Information Seeking and Scanning Behaviors among Older Chinese Adults: Examining the Roles of Fatalistic Beliefs and Fear.中国老年人群体中与癌症相关的信息寻求与浏览行为:探究宿命论信念和恐惧的作用
Geriatrics (Basel). 2017 Dec 3;2(4):38. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics2040038.
3
Television News Coverage of Public Health Issues and Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice.电视新闻对公共卫生问题的报道及其对公共卫生政策和实践的影响。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:167-185. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-044017. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
4
Health information seeking behavior of female breast cancer patients.女性乳腺癌患者的健康信息寻求行为。
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Nov 27;7:138. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_17_18. eCollection 2018.
5
Information sources and online information seeking behaviours of cancer patients in Singapore.新加坡癌症患者的信息来源及在线信息搜索行为
Ecancermedicalscience. 2018 Oct 31;12:880. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2018.880. eCollection 2018.
6
A qualitative study on Singaporean women's views towards breast cancer screening and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) gene testing to guide personalised screening strategies.一项关于新加坡女性对乳腺癌筛查和单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因检测以指导个体化筛查策略的看法的定性研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3781-8.
7
Text Messaging Interventions on Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review.短信干预对癌症筛查率的影响:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 24;19(8):e296. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7893.
8
Monitoring modifiable risk factors for breast cancer: an obligation for health professionals.监测乳腺癌的可改变风险因素:健康专业人员的一项义务。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017 Jun 8;41:e80. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.80.
9
Clinicians' Expectations of the Benefits and Harms of Treatments, Screening, and Tests: A Systematic Review.临床医生对治疗、筛查和检测的获益和危害的期望:系统评价。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Mar 1;177(3):407-419. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8254.
10
Barriers to Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Singapore: a Mixed Methods Analysis.新加坡乳腺癌和宫颈癌筛查的障碍:一项混合方法分析。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(8):3887-95.

新加坡女性的乳腺癌信息行为和需求:一项定性研究。

Breast Cancer Information Behaviours and Needs among Singapore Women: A Qualitative Study.

机构信息

Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore.

National University of Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):1767-1774. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1767.

DOI:10.31557/APJCP.2021.22.6.1767
PMID:34181332
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8418835/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence on cancer communication and its impact on cancer-related health outcomes; however, little is known about how women gain access to and use breast cancer information in the multi-ethnic Asian context. This paper aimed to explore the breast cancer information acquisition behaviours and needs among Singapore women who attended a community-based health organisation for mammography screening. Methods, design and setting: Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 37 racially diverse, aged 50 and above women, who have received mammography screening within the past two years. The interviews were conducted at either the Singapore Cancer Society Clinic or participant's home.

RESULTS

Although cancer information scanning was more prevalent than information seeking (91.9% vs. 62.2%), those who purposively seek information exhibited a higher knowledge level of breast cancer. The most commonly cited sources for information scanning were friends, television and family, and for information seeking were the Internet, pamphlets from a healthcare organisation/ public authority, and healthcare providers. Singapore women were well-informed about the benefits of mammogram; however, specific knowledge, such as modifiable risk factors, reasons for different screening options and the trade-off between harm and benefit, was still lacking which led to confusion about screening.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer health educational materials should provide clear and balanced information to give women a more accurate or realistic expectation about mammography screening. Study findings provide important implications for breast cancer education and programs to move beyond simply raising awareness and craft specific informative messages addressing the needs of the target group.  
.

摘要

背景

越来越多的证据表明癌症沟通及其对癌症相关健康结果的影响;然而,对于在多族裔亚洲背景下,女性如何获得和使用乳腺癌信息知之甚少。本文旨在探讨在参加社区为乳房 X 光筛查而设立的健康组织的新加坡女性中,乳腺癌信息获取行为和需求。
方法、设计和设置:通过对 37 名不同种族、年龄在 50 岁及以上的女性进行半结构化访谈,收集了定性数据。这些女性在过去两年内接受过乳房 X 光筛查,访谈在新加坡癌症协会诊所或参与者家中进行。
结果:尽管癌症信息扫描比信息寻求更为普遍(91.9% 比 62.2%),但那些有目的地寻求信息的人表现出更高的乳腺癌知识水平。信息扫描最常被引用的来源是朋友、电视和家庭,而信息寻求最常被引用的来源是互联网、医疗机构/公共机构的小册子以及医疗保健提供者。新加坡女性对乳房 X 光检查的益处有很好的了解;然而,特定的知识,如可改变的风险因素、不同筛查选择的原因以及危害和益处之间的权衡,仍然缺乏,这导致了对筛查的困惑。
结论:乳腺癌健康教育材料应提供清晰和平衡的信息,使女性对乳房 X 光筛查有更准确或现实的期望。研究结果为乳腺癌教育和计划提供了重要的启示,使这些计划不仅能提高认识,还能针对目标群体的需求制定具体的信息传递信息。