• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过同理心训练减少欺凌行为:教师被动在场的影响。

Reducing Bullying through Empathy Training: The Effect of Teacher's Passive Presence.

作者信息

Palade Teodora, Pascal Emilia

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Department of Psychology, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, 700506 Iasi, Romania.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 2;13(3):216. doi: 10.3390/bs13030216.

DOI:10.3390/bs13030216
PMID:36975241
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10044840/
Abstract

Bullying is a serious problem in schools all around the globe, and implementing intervention strategies effective over time is still difficult, despite the consistent literature on the subject. In this study, we tested the efficiency of a 5-day intensive empathy training program in reducing bullying among third graders. The sample included three classes of third graders ( = 64, = 9.45; = 0.50) from a Romanian school. A 3 × 3 mixed experimental design was used where we manipulated the type of intervention (control group-no empathy training, experimental group 1-empathy training with the teacher present, and experimental group 2-empathy training without teacher present) and the time of measurement (pre-test, post-test, and 3 weeks' follow-up). The results showed that the intervention determined a significant increase in empathy and a significant decrease in verbal bullying but only for the experimental group where the teacher was physically present in the classroom during the intervention. Moreover, the pattern of results showed that the effects of the intervention increased 21 days after it was completed, meaning that the program could have long-term effects. No significant change in physical bullying behaviors was observed.

摘要

霸凌是全球学校中一个严重的问题,尽管有大量关于该主题的文献,但长期实施有效的干预策略仍然困难。在本研究中,我们测试了一个为期5天的强化同理心训练项目在减少三年级学生霸凌行为方面的效果。样本包括罗马尼亚一所学校的三个三年级班级(n = 64,M = 9.45;SD = 0.50)。采用了3×3混合实验设计,我们操纵了干预类型(对照组——无同理心训练,实验组1——教师在场的同理心训练,实验组2——教师不在场的同理心训练)和测量时间(预测试、后测试和3周随访)。结果表明,干预导致同理心显著增加,言语霸凌显著减少,但仅针对干预期间教师实际在课堂上的实验组。此外,结果模式表明,干预完成21天后效果增强,这意味着该项目可能有长期影响。未观察到身体霸凌行为有显著变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f26f/10044840/5bf557e86325/behavsci-13-00216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f26f/10044840/2e225c042399/behavsci-13-00216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f26f/10044840/98c326af3869/behavsci-13-00216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f26f/10044840/5bf557e86325/behavsci-13-00216-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f26f/10044840/2e225c042399/behavsci-13-00216-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f26f/10044840/98c326af3869/behavsci-13-00216-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f26f/10044840/5bf557e86325/behavsci-13-00216-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Reducing Bullying through Empathy Training: The Effect of Teacher's Passive Presence.通过同理心训练减少欺凌行为:教师被动在场的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 2;13(3):216. doi: 10.3390/bs13030216.
2
School Bullies' Intention to Change Behavior Following Teacher Interventions: Effects of Empathy Arousal, Condemning of Bullying, and Blaming of the Perpetrator.教师干预后学校霸凌者改变行为的意图:共情唤起、谴责霸凌行为以及指责霸凌者的影响。
Prev Sci. 2016 Nov;17(8):1034-1043. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0712-x.
3
Effects of the KiVa Anti-Bullying Program on Affective and Cognitive Empathy in Children and Adolescents.KiVa 反欺凌计划对儿童和青少年情感和认知同理心的影响。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2022 Jul-Aug;51(4):515-529. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2020.1846541. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
4
The association between in-class cultural diversity with empathy and bullying in adolescence: A multilevel mediation analysis.班级文化多样性与青少年同理心和欺凌行为的关系:多层次中介分析。
Int J Psychol. 2020 Oct;55(5):769-778. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12700. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
5
The Effect of Empathy Training on Bullying Behavior in Juvenile Prisoners: A Quasi Experiment.共情训练对少年犯欺凌行为的影响:一项准实验
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 29;17:4177-4188. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S479364. eCollection 2024.
6
The KiVa antibullying program in primary schools in Chile, with and without the digital game component: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.智利小学的KiVa反欺凌项目,有无数字游戏组件:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 20;18(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1810-1.
7
Perceived Teacher Responses to Bullying Influence Students' Social Cognitions.教师对欺凌行为的感知反应会影响学生的社会认知。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 1;11:592582. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.592582. eCollection 2020.
8
Efficacy of a Web-Enabled, School-Based, Preventative Intervention to Reduce Bullying and Improve Mental Health in Children and Adolescents: Study Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.一项基于网络的、以学校为基础的预防性干预措施对减少儿童和青少年欺凌行为及改善心理健康的效果:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
Front Pediatr. 2021 Apr 26;9:628984. doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.628984. eCollection 2021.
9
Feeling cybervictims' pain-The effect of empathy training on cyberbullying.感受网络受害者的痛苦——同理心训练对网络欺凌的影响。
Aggress Behav. 2016 Mar-Apr;42(2):147-56. doi: 10.1002/ab.21613. Epub 2015 Sep 9.
10
Intention to Stop Bullying following a Condemning, Empathy-Raising, or Combined Message from a Teacher - Do Students' Empathy and Callous-Unemotional Traits Matter?教师谴责、共情唤起或综合信息后学生停止欺凌的意图——学生的共情和无情特质重要吗?
J Youth Adolesc. 2022 Aug;51(8):1568-1580. doi: 10.1007/s10964-022-01613-5. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Bullying and cyberbullying. A high risk, in boys and girls, of superficial learning, poor planning and academic procrastination.欺凌和网络欺凌。在男孩和女孩中,存在表面学习、计划能力差和学业拖延的高风险。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 10;16:1567523. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1567523. eCollection 2025.
2
Causes of bullying among young people and protective mechanisms and preventative factors that promote mental health and well-being: young people's perspectives.年轻人之间欺凌行为的成因以及促进心理健康和幸福的保护机制与预防因素:年轻人的观点
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2025 Dec;20(1):2524459. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2025.2524459. Epub 2025 Jun 30.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Oxytocin weakens self-other distinction in males during empathic responses to sadness: an event-related potentials study.催产素在男性对悲伤的共情反应中会削弱自我与他人的区分:一项事件相关电位研究。
PeerJ. 2020 Nov 19;8:e10384. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10384. eCollection 2020.
2
Dimensions of empathy and bystander intervention in bullying in elementary school.小学生欺凌中同理心和旁观者干预的维度。
J Sch Psychol. 2020 Apr;79:31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
Empathy and Callous-Unemotional Traits in Different Bullying Roles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
The Effect of Empathy Training on Bullying Behavior in Juvenile Prisoners: A Quasi Experiment.
共情训练对少年犯欺凌行为的影响:一项准实验
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 Aug 29;17:4177-4188. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S479364. eCollection 2024.
4
Teachers' Perceptions and Position Regarding the Problem of Bullying and Its Socio-Educational Prevention.教师对欺凌问题及其社会教育预防的认知与立场
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 12;14(3):229. doi: 10.3390/bs14030229.
不同欺凌角色中的同理心和冷酷无情特质:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2019 Jan;20(1):3-21. doi: 10.1177/1524838016683456. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
4
Predicting bystander intervention among middle school students.预测中学生的旁观者干预行为。
Sch Psychol Q. 2018 Jun;33(2):305-313. doi: 10.1037/spq0000262.
5
Preventing Peer Violence Against Children: Methods and Baseline Data of a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial in Pakistan.预防儿童同伴暴力:巴基斯坦一项集群随机对照试验的方法和基线数据。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2017 Mar 28;5(1):115-137. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00215. Print 2017 Mar 24.
6
Bullying in schools: the state of knowledge and effective interventions.学校欺凌:知识现状与有效干预。
Psychol Health Med. 2017 Mar;22(sup1):240-253. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2017.1279740. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
7
More than Just a Meal: Breakfast Club Attendance and Children's Social Relationships.不仅仅是一顿饭:早餐俱乐部参与度与儿童社会关系
Front Public Health. 2015 Jul 30;3:183. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2015.00183. eCollection 2015.
8
Relationship Between Peer Victimization and Posttraumatic Stress Among Primary School Children.小学生同伴侵害与创伤后应激之间的关系
J Trauma Stress. 2015 Aug;28(4):348-54. doi: 10.1002/jts.22031. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
9
Empathy and motivation for justice: Cognitive empathy and concern, but not emotional empathy, predict sensitivity to injustice for others.同理心与追求正义的动机:认知同理心和关切,但非情感同理心,能预测对他人遭受不公正对待的敏感度。
Soc Neurosci. 2016;11(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2015.1029593. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
Empathetic responsiveness, group norms, and prosocial affiliations in bullying roles.欺凌角色中的共情反应、群体规范和亲社会关系。
Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Mar;29(1):99-109. doi: 10.1037/spq0000052.