Muthanna Abdulghani, Alduais Ahmed
Department of Teacher Education, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Human Sciences (Psychology), University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 2;13(3):218. doi: 10.3390/bs13030218.
By employing a thematic review of 74 relevant publications and our learning, teaching, and research experiences and expertise, we discussed the concepts of 'reflexivity', 'sensitivity' and 'integrity', and the factors that enhance or hinder their practice. We also categorized the levels of sensitivity according to the stages of conducting and interpreting interviews in qualitative research. By categorizing the three levels of sensitivity 'i.e., high sensitivity during interviewing, higher sensitivity during transcribing data, and highest sensitivity and criticality during interpreting data' with practical examples, we offer an approach that facilitates and supports the application of ethical interviews. We conclude that achieving sensitivity and reflexivity enhances the trustworthiness of the overall research and reflects the application of research ethics and integrity in practice.
通过对74篇相关出版物进行主题综述,并结合我们的学习、教学及研究经验与专业知识,我们讨论了“反思性”“敏感性”和“完整性”的概念,以及促进或阻碍其实践的因素。我们还根据定性研究中进行访谈和解读访谈的阶段对敏感性水平进行了分类。通过结合实际例子对敏感性的三个水平(即访谈期间的高敏感性、转录数据期间的较高敏感性以及解读数据期间的最高敏感性和关键性)进行分类,我们提供了一种便于并支持应用伦理访谈的方法。我们得出结论,实现敏感性和反思性可提高整体研究的可信度,并反映出研究伦理和完整性在实践中的应用。