Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship.
作者信息
Schoenherr Jordan R
机构信息
Department of Psychology, Carleton University Ottawa, ON, Canada ; Department of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa Ottawa, ON, Canada.
出版信息
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 21;6:877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00877. eCollection 2015.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship.道德作者身份的社会认知障碍。
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 21;6:877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00877. eCollection 2015.
2
Ethical issues in biomedical publications.生物医学出版物中的伦理问题。
Hum Fertil (Camb). 2001;4(4):261-6. doi: 10.1080/1464727012000199631.
3
Ethical issues in biomedical publications.生物医学出版物中的伦理问题。
Fertil Steril. 2002 May;77(5):883-8. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03076-5.
4
The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema.追求研究诚信的清晰性：概念框架。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):1085-1093. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0052-2. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
5
[How to avoid research misconduct - recommendations for surgeons].[如何避免研究不端行为——给外科医生的建议]
J Chir (Paris). 2008 Nov-Dec;145(6):534-41. doi: 10.1016/s0021-7697(08)74683-0.
6
[Publication ethics, national and international regulations].[出版伦理、国家和国际法规]
Ugeskr Laeger. 2003 Apr 14;165(16):1646-8.
7
From authorship to contributorship. Promoting integrity in research publication.从作者身份到贡献者身份。促进研究发表的诚信。
Nurse Educ. 1998 Nov-Dec;23(6):26-32. doi: 10.1097/00006223-199811000-00010.
8
Research ethics III: Publication practices and authorship, conflicts of interest, and research misconduct.研究伦理 III：出版实践与作者署名、利益冲突和研究不端行为。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2011 Feb;54(1):S346-62. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0263). Epub 2010 Nov 16.
9
Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise: reflections on the troubled question of authorship.出版伦理与研究评估活动：对备受困扰的作者身份问题的思考
J Med Ethics. 2000 Dec;26(6):422-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.6.422.
10
Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?科学领域的不当行为：家庭医学存在问题吗？
Fam Med. 1990 Mar-Apr;22(2):137-42.
引用本文的文献
1
The Interrelationship of Reflexivity, Sensitivity and Integrity in Conducting Interviews.访谈过程中反思性、敏感性与完整性的相互关系
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 2;13(3):218. doi: 10.3390/bs13030218.
2
How to Crack Pre-registration: Toward Transparent and Open Science.如何攻克预注册：迈向透明和开放科学。
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 26;9:1831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01831. eCollection 2018.
本文引用的文献
1
Scientific Misconduct and the Myth of Self-Correction in Science.科学不端行为与科学自我纠错的神话
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):670-88. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460687.
2
Systematic review on the primary and secondary reporting of the prevalence of ghostwriting in the medical literature.关于医学文献中代笔行为发生率的主要和次要报告的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 14;4(7):e004777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004777.
3
Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students.研究生在负责任的研究行为中的社会化：一项关于心理学博士生研究伦理培训经历的全国性调查。
Ethics Behav. 2009 Nov 1;19(6):496-518. doi: 10.1080/10508420903275283.
4
The prevalence of honorary and ghost authorships in Iranian bio-medical journals and its associated factors.伊朗生物医学期刊中荣誉作者和挂名作者的 prevalence 及其相关因素。 （注：这里“prevalence”常见释义为“流行率”“患病率”等，结合语境可能准确意思需进一步根据原文背景确定）
Iran J Public Health. 2011;40(1):15-21. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
5
Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: a cross sectional survey.高影响力生物医学期刊中的荣誉作者和幽灵作者：一项横断面调查。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 25;343:d6128. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d6128.
6
Regression of moral reasoning during medical education: combined design study to evaluate the effect of clinical study years.医学教育中道德推理的回归：评估临床研究年限影响的联合设计研究
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 30;6(3):e17406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017406.
7
Monetary favors and their influence on neural responses and revealed preference.货币优惠及其对神经反应和显性偏好的影响。
J Neurosci. 2010 Jul 14;30(28):9597-602. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1086-10.2010.
8
Credit where credit is due? Regulation, research integrity and the attribution of authorship in the health sciences.有其功而受其赏？规制、研究诚信与健康科学领域的作者署名
Soc Sci Med. 2010 May;70(9):1458-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.013. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
9
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据？对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
10
Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: the effect of one bad apple on the barrel.不道德行为中的传染与分化：一个坏苹果对一桶苹果的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2009 Mar;20(3):393-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02306.x. Epub 2009 Feb 23.
Zotero 插件