• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创作者个性特质与抑郁对团队协作式设计绩效的影响。

The Effect of Creators' Personality Traits and Depression on Teamwork-Based Design Performance.

作者信息

Wang Szu-Jung, Chen Rain, Lu Hsiu-Ching

机构信息

Toast International Co., Ltd., Taichung City 407, Taiwan.

Department of Visual Communication Design, Southern Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Tainan City 710, Taiwan.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 11;13(3):248. doi: 10.3390/bs13030248.

DOI:10.3390/bs13030248
PMID:36975273
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10045058/
Abstract

Many organizations encourage carrying out a project by teamwork for consensus building and managing risks in decision making. When working as a team, the members' personality traits and depression may affect project performance. This study explored the personality traits and depression of creators on their design performance in teamwork. This study used the Big-Five Personality Traits Scale (Big-5) and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Forty-four volunteers were chosen to participate in this study as the study subjects. A total of 11 design teams were formed based on the participants' personality trait score and the depression score. The design performance of the participants was rated by creativity, aesthetics, and completeness. The study results showed that (1) for creativity, PT4 Neuroticism and D1 No Depression performed the best; (2) for aesthetics, PT4 Neuroticism, PT5 Openness, and D2 Mild Depression performed the best; (3) for completeness, PT5 Openness and D4 Severe Depression performed the best; and (4) for member satisfaction and work satisfaction, PT4 Neuroticism and D2 Mild Depression had the lowest scores. Therefore, the overall teamwork performance can be affected by personality traits and depression. Each individual's personality trait and emotional expression may improve team performance via different dimensions, such as creativity, aesthetics, and completeness. Project managers should have members of different personality traits and with different emotional expression on a team as their personality traits and emotion can facilitate team collaboration.

摘要

许多组织鼓励通过团队合作来开展项目,以达成共识并管理决策中的风险。在团队工作时,成员的性格特质和抑郁情绪可能会影响项目绩效。本研究探讨了团队合作中创作者的性格特质和抑郁情绪对其设计绩效的影响。本研究使用了大五人格特质量表(Big-5)和流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)。选取了44名志愿者作为研究对象参与本研究。根据参与者的性格特质得分和抑郁得分,共组建了11个设计团队。参与者的设计绩效通过创造力、美学和完整性进行评估。研究结果表明:(1)在创造力方面,PT4神经质型和D1无抑郁组表现最佳;(2)在美学方面,PT4神经质型、PT5开放性和D2轻度抑郁组表现最佳;(3)在完整性方面,PT5开放性和D4重度抑郁组表现最佳;(4)在成员满意度和工作满意度方面,PT4神经质型和D2轻度抑郁组得分最低。因此,团队合作的整体绩效会受到性格特质和抑郁情绪的影响。每个人的性格特质和情绪表达可能会通过不同维度,如创造力、美学和完整性,来提升团队绩效。项目经理在组建团队时应纳入具有不同性格特质和情绪表达的成员,因为他们的性格特质和情绪能够促进团队协作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/8ace43ea47a8/behavsci-13-00248-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/87a374103b34/behavsci-13-00248-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/f3a2c6df6562/behavsci-13-00248-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/c06e06981f23/behavsci-13-00248-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/2a6bc8289d87/behavsci-13-00248-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/ac21ff6927b3/behavsci-13-00248-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/a1a5a84348a0/behavsci-13-00248-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/742048746f98/behavsci-13-00248-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/210ec1b198ae/behavsci-13-00248-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/e921f7ab7505/behavsci-13-00248-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/f694944d4639/behavsci-13-00248-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/8ace43ea47a8/behavsci-13-00248-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/87a374103b34/behavsci-13-00248-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/f3a2c6df6562/behavsci-13-00248-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/c06e06981f23/behavsci-13-00248-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/2a6bc8289d87/behavsci-13-00248-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/ac21ff6927b3/behavsci-13-00248-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/a1a5a84348a0/behavsci-13-00248-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/742048746f98/behavsci-13-00248-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/210ec1b198ae/behavsci-13-00248-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/e921f7ab7505/behavsci-13-00248-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/f694944d4639/behavsci-13-00248-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d31/10045058/8ace43ea47a8/behavsci-13-00248-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
The Effect of Creators' Personality Traits and Depression on Teamwork-Based Design Performance.创作者个性特质与抑郁对团队协作式设计绩效的影响。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 11;13(3):248. doi: 10.3390/bs13030248.
2
How personality affects teamwork: a study in multidisciplinary obstetrical simulation.人格如何影响团队合作:多学科产科模拟研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Mar;3(2):100303. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100303. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
3
Dr. Congeniality: Understanding the Importance of Surgeons' Nontechnical Skills Through 360° Feedback.《魅力医生:通过 360°反馈了解外科医生的非技术技能的重要性》
J Surg Educ. 2018 Jul-Aug;75(4):984-992. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.12.006. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Personality traits are consistently associated with blood mitochondrial DNA copy number estimated from genome sequences in two genetic cohort studies.人格特质与从两个遗传队列研究的基因组序列中估计的血液线粒体 DNA 拷贝数始终相关。
Elife. 2022 Dec 20;11:e77806. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77806.
5
Do Personality Traits Mediate the Relationship Between Childhood Abuse and Migraine? An Exploration of the Relationships in Young Adults Using the Add Health Dataset.人格特质是否在儿童期虐待与偏头痛之间起中介作用?利用“健康增进纵向研究”数据对青年期两者关系的探讨。
Headache. 2018 Feb;58(2):243-259. doi: 10.1111/head.13206. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
6
Self-Expressive Creativity in the Adolescent Digital Domain: Personality, Self-Esteem, and Emotions.青少年数字领域的自我表达创造力:人格、自尊和情绪。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 15;16(22):4527. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224527.
7
The influence of personality and ability on undergraduate teamwork and team performance.个性与能力对本科学生团队合作及团队表现的影响。
Springerplus. 2013 Dec;2(1):16. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-2-16. Epub 2013 Jan 19.
8
Personality traits among major depressive disorder in southern Thailand: a hospital-based case-control study.泰国南部重度抑郁症患者的人格特征:一项基于医院的病例对照研究。
BMC Psychol. 2023 Jan 24;11(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01057-x.
9
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
10
Personality Traits and Emotion Regulation Styles of Elite Beach Volleyball Dyads: Examination of Intra-Team Differences, Performance and Satisfaction Levels.精英沙滩排球双人组合的人格特质与情绪调节方式:团队内部差异、表现及满意度水平的考察
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 22;12:719572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719572. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Manifestations of depressive affect in adolescence.青少年抑郁情绪的表现。
J Youth Adolesc. 1991 Apr;20(2):121-33. doi: 10.1007/BF01537604.
2
Sickness absence in Swedish parents of children with Down's syndrome: relation to self-perceived health, stress and sense of coherence.瑞典唐氏综合征患儿父母的病假情况:与自我认知健康、压力和连贯感的关系。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006 Jul;50(Pt 7):546-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00810.x.
3
Exposure to terrorism, stress-related mental health symptoms, and defensive coping among Jews and Arabs in Israel.
以色列犹太人和阿拉伯人遭受恐怖主义的经历、与压力相关的心理健康症状及防御性应对方式。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006 Apr;74(2):207-18. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.74.2.207.
4
Team effectiveness: beyond skills and cognitive ability.团队效能:超越技能和认知能力
J Appl Psychol. 1999 Jun;84(3):376-89. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.376.
5
Composition, process, and performance in self-managed groups: the role of personality.自我管理团队中的组成、过程与绩效:个性的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 1997 Feb;82(1):62-78. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.62.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.健康相关生活质量测量的跨文化适应:文献综述与建议指南
J Clin Epidemiol. 1993 Dec;46(12):1417-32. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n.
7
Creativity and psychopathology. A study of 291 world-famous men.创造力与精神病理学。对291位世界著名男性的研究。
Br J Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;165(1):22-34. doi: 10.1192/bjp.165.1.22.
8
The measurement of psychological androgyny.心理双性化的测量。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974 Apr;42(2):155-62.
9
Depression in Taiwan: epidemiological survey utilizing CES-D.台湾地区的抑郁症:使用流调中心用抑郁量表进行的流行病学调查。
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 1985;87(5):335-8.