Nutritional Sciences Program, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nutritional Sciences Program, Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Aug;35(8):e14584. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14584. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
This study seeks to evaluate eating competence and disordered eating likelihood among members of online support groups for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and determine whether eating competence and disordered eating likelihood varies according to IBS symptom severity and subtype.
This cross-sectional study is based on an anonymous survey conducted from August to September 2021. Adults with IBS (N = 225) were recruited from online and social media IBS support forums. IBS symptom severity was assessed using the validated IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS), likelihood of disordered eating was assessed using the validated Eating Attitudes Test (EAT-26), and eating competence was assessed using the validated Satter Eating Competence Inventory (ecSI 2.0™). Multiple linear regression was used to predict EAT-26 total score from IBS-SSS score, age, and IBS subtype. ANOVAs were used to examine the relationships between IBS severity level, IBS subtype, and ecSI 2.0™ total score.
Eating competence among the sample was low at 17% while 27% was classified as likely or very likely disordered eating. IBS severity was positively associated with EAT-26 score (p = 0.011) and ecSI 2.0™ score was significantly lower in the severe IBS group compared to the moderate IBS group (p = 0.016). No relationship was detected between IBS subtype and EAT-26 or ecSI 2.0™ scores.
CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: IBS severity was positively associated with disordered eating likelihood and negatively associated with eating competence. This sheds light on the importance of assessing eating competence and screening for disordered eating prior to selecting therapies for patients with IBS, particularly in females with severe symptoms.
本研究旨在评估肠易激综合征(IBS)在线支持小组中成员的进食能力和饮食失调可能性,并确定进食能力和饮食失调可能性是否因 IBS 症状严重程度和亚型而异。
本横断面研究基于 2021 年 8 月至 9 月进行的一项匿名调查。从在线和社交媒体 IBS 支持论坛招募 IBS 成人(N=225)。使用经过验证的 IBS 严重程度评分系统(IBS-SSS)评估 IBS 症状严重程度,使用经过验证的饮食态度测试(EAT-26)评估饮食失调可能性,使用经过验证的 Satter 饮食能力量表(ecSI 2.0™)评估饮食能力。多元线性回归用于从 IBS-SSS 评分、年龄和 IBS 亚型预测 EAT-26 总分。方差分析用于检查 IBS 严重程度水平、IBS 亚型和 ecSI 2.0™ 总分之间的关系。
该样本的进食能力较低,为 17%,而 27%被归类为可能或非常可能饮食失调。IBS 严重程度与 EAT-26 评分呈正相关(p=0.011),与中度 IBS 组相比,重度 IBS 组的 ecSI 2.0™评分显著降低(p=0.016)。IBS 亚型与 EAT-26 或 ecSI 2.0™评分之间未检测到关系。
IBS 严重程度与饮食失调可能性呈正相关,与进食能力呈负相关。这表明在为 IBS 患者选择治疗方法之前,评估进食能力和筛查饮食失调的重要性,特别是在有严重症状的女性中。