• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

礼貌用语源于相互竞争的社会目标。

Polite Speech Emerges From Competing Social Goals.

作者信息

Yoon Erica J, Tessler Michael Henry, Goodman Noah D, Frank Michael C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Stanford University.

出版信息

Open Mind (Camb). 2020 Nov;4:71-87. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00035.

DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00035
PMID:33225196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7672308/
Abstract

Language is a remarkably efficient tool for transmitting information. Yet human speakers make statements that are inefficient, imprecise, or even contrary to their own beliefs, all in the service of being polite. What rational machinery underlies polite language use? Here, we show that polite speech emerges from the competition of three communicative goals: to convey information, to be kind, and to present oneself in a good light. We formalize this goal tradeoff using a probabilistic model of utterance production, which predicts human utterance choices in socially sensitive situations with high quantitative accuracy, and we show that our full model is superior to its variants with subsets of the three goals. This utility-theoretic approach to speech acts takes a step toward explaining the richness and subtlety of social language use.

摘要

语言是传递信息的一种极其高效的工具。然而,人类说话者会做出效率低下、不准确甚至与自己信念相悖的陈述,而这一切都是为了礼貌。礼貌语言使用背后的理性机制是什么?在这里,我们表明礼貌言语源于三个交际目标的竞争:传达信息、友善待人以及展现良好形象。我们使用言语生成的概率模型将这种目标权衡形式化,该模型在社会敏感情境中能以高定量精度预测人类的言语选择,并且我们表明完整模型优于具有这三个目标子集的变体模型。这种言语行为的效用理论方法朝着解释社会语言使用的丰富性和微妙性迈出了一步。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/05dac53ee3ae/opmi-04-71-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/6aaec642d3a1/opmi-04-71-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/6b0097feaabb/opmi-04-71-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/1e6484b5ea31/opmi-04-71-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/add7e19437b8/opmi-04-71-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/c189ef540c9a/opmi-04-71-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/05dac53ee3ae/opmi-04-71-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/6aaec642d3a1/opmi-04-71-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/6b0097feaabb/opmi-04-71-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/1e6484b5ea31/opmi-04-71-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/add7e19437b8/opmi-04-71-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/c189ef540c9a/opmi-04-71-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c1/8412195/05dac53ee3ae/opmi-04-71-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Polite Speech Emerges From Competing Social Goals.礼貌用语源于相互竞争的社会目标。
Open Mind (Camb). 2020 Nov;4:71-87. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00035.
2
Learning about others: Modeling social inference through ambiguity resolution.了解他人:通过解决歧义进行社会推理建模。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104862. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104862. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
3
Development in the use and understanding of polite forms in children.儿童在礼貌用语的使用和理解方面的发展。
J Speech Hear Res. 1982 Jun;25(2):193-202. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2502.193.
4
Nonliteral understanding of number words.对数字词的非字面理解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 19;111(33):12002-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407479111. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
5
Should robots be polite? Expectations about politeness in human-robot interaction.机器人应该有礼貌吗?对人机交互中礼貌的期望。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Nov 30;10:1242127. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1242127. eCollection 2023.
6
Bossy and nice requests: varying language register in speakers with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).专横与友善的请求:自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)患者语言语域的变化
J Commun Disord. 2009 Jan-Feb;42(1):58-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2008.08.003. Epub 2008 Sep 4.
7
An Information-Theoretic Account of Availability Effects in Language Production.信息论视角下语言产生中的可及性效应
Top Cogn Sci. 2024 Jan;16(1):38-53. doi: 10.1111/tops.12716. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
8
The Intonation and Pragmatics of Greek wh-Questions.希腊语特殊疑问句的语调与语用学
Lang Speech. 2020 Mar;63(1):56-94. doi: 10.1177/0023830918823236. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
9
Please and no, thank you: politeness norms alter compliance more when refusing than when making or acquiescing to a request.请,不,谢谢:在拒绝时比在提出或默许请求时,礼貌规范对服从的影响更大。
J Soc Psychol. 2022 Jul 4;162(4):471-484. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2021.1921681. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
How about another piece of pie: the allusional pretense theory of discourse irony.再来看看另一种观点:话语反讽的虚幻伪装理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1995 Mar;124(1):3-21. doi: 10.1037//0096-3445.124.1.3.

引用本文的文献

1
The alignment model of indirect communication.间接沟通的对齐模型。
PLoS One. 2025 May 28;20(5):e0323839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323839. eCollection 2025.
2
On the Role of Loopholes in Polite Communication: Linking Subjectivity and Pragmatic Inference.论礼貌交流中漏洞的作用:连接主观性与语用推理
Open Mind (Camb). 2024 Apr 10;8:500-510. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00133. eCollection 2024.
3
Active Iterative Social Inference in Multi-Trial Signaling Games.多轮信号博弈中的主动迭代社会推理

本文引用的文献

1
Scalar Diversity, Negative Strengthening, and Adjectival Semantics.标量多样性、负强化与形容词语义
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 12;9:1659. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01659. eCollection 2018.
2
Ten-month-old infants infer the value of goals from the costs of actions.10 个月大的婴儿可以从行为成本中推断出目标的价值。
Science. 2017 Nov 24;358(6366):1038-1041. doi: 10.1126/science.aag2132.
3
Pragmatic Language Interpretation as Probabilistic Inference.语用语言阐释作为概率推理。
Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Apr 5;7:111-129. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00074. eCollection 2023.
4
Teachers recruit mentalizing regions to represent learners' beliefs.教师招募心理理论区域来代表学习者的信念。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 May 30;120(22):e2215015120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215015120. Epub 2023 May 22.
5
Modeling Individual Differences in Children's Information Integration During Pragmatic Word Learning.语用词汇学习过程中儿童信息整合的个体差异建模
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Dec 16;6:311-326. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00069. eCollection 2022.
6
A Pragmatic Account of the Weak Evidence Effect.对弱证据效应的一种实用解释。
Open Mind (Camb). 2022 Sep 28;6:169-182. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00061. eCollection 2022.
7
Great ape communication as contextual social inference: a computational modelling perspective.巨猿交流作为语境社会推理:计算建模视角。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Sep 12;377(1859):20210096. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0096. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
8
Learning from other minds: An optimistic critique of reinforcement learning models of social learning.向他人学习:对社会学习强化学习模型的乐观批判。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2021 Apr;38:110-115. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.01.006. Epub 2021 Mar 23.
9
Children's reputation management: Learning to identify what is socially valued and acting upon it.儿童声誉管理:学会识别社会所重视的事物并据此行动。
Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2021 Aug 1;30(4):315-320. doi: 10.1177/09637214211009516. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
10
How young children integrate information sources to infer the meaning of words.幼儿如何整合信息源来推断单词的意思。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Aug;5(8):1046-1054. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01145-1. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;20(11):818-829. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.08.005. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
4
The Naïve Utility Calculus: Computational Principles Underlying Commonsense Psychology.朴素效用演算:常识心理学的基础计算原则。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Aug;20(8):589-604. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.011. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
5
Nonliteral understanding of number words.对数字词的非字面理解。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 19;111(33):12002-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1407479111. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
6
Knowledge and implicature: modeling language understanding as social cognition.知识与含意:将语言理解建模为社会认知。
Top Cogn Sci. 2013 Jan;5(1):173-84. doi: 10.1111/tops.12007.
7
Predicting pragmatic reasoning in language games.预测语言游戏中的语用推理。
Science. 2012 May 25;336(6084):998. doi: 10.1126/science.1218633.
8
Action understanding as inverse planning.作为反向规划的动作理解
Cognition. 2009 Dec;113(3):329-349. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.07.005. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
9
When some is actually all: scalar inferences in face-threatening contexts.当部分即为全部时:面子威胁语境中的等级含义推断
Cognition. 2009 Aug;112(2):249-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.05.005. Epub 2009 Jun 10.
10
The logic of indirect speech.间接引语的逻辑。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jan 22;105(3):833-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707192105. Epub 2008 Jan 16.