• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2020年7月和2021年2月英国新冠病毒病风险因素的优先级划分

Prioritization of COVID-19 risk factors in July 2020 and February 2021 in the UK.

作者信息

Tangirala Sivateja, Tierney Braden T, Patel Chirag J

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Department of Statistics and Data Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.

出版信息

Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Mar 30;3(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00271-3.

DOI:10.1038/s43856-023-00271-3
PMID:36997659
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10062272/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Risk for COVID-19 positivity and hospitalization due to diverse environmental and sociodemographic factors may change as the pandemic progresses.

METHODS

We investigated the association of 360 exposures sampled before COVID-19 outcomes for participants in the UK Biobank, including 9268 and 38,837 non-overlapping participants, sampled at July 17, 2020 and February 2, 2021, respectively. The 360 exposures included clinical biomarkers (e.g., BMI), health indicators (e.g., doctor-diagnosed diabetes), and environmental/behavioral variables (e.g., air pollution) measured 10-14 years before the COVID-19 time periods.

RESULTS

Here we show, for example, "participant having son and/or daughter in household" was associated with an increase in incidence from 20% to 32% (risk difference of 12%) between timepoints. Furthermore, we find age to be increasingly associated with COVID-19 positivity over time from Risk Ratio [RR] (per 10-year age increase) of 0.81 to 0.6 (hospitalization RR from 1.18 to 2.63, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data-driven approach demonstrates that time of pandemic plays a role in identifying risk factors associated with positivity and hospitalization.

摘要

背景

随着疫情的发展,由于各种环境和社会人口因素导致的新冠病毒检测呈阳性及住院风险可能会发生变化。

方法

我们调查了英国生物银行参与者在新冠病毒感染结果出现之前采集的360种暴露因素之间的关联,其中包括分别于2020年7月17日和2021年2月2日采集的9268名和38837名不重叠的参与者。这360种暴露因素包括在新冠病毒感染时间段之前10 - 14年测量的临床生物标志物(如体重指数)、健康指标(如医生诊断的糖尿病)以及环境/行为变量(如空气污染)。

结果

例如,我们在此表明,“家中有儿子和/或女儿的参与者”在各时间点之间的发病率从20%增加到32%(风险差异为12%)。此外,我们发现随着时间的推移,年龄与新冠病毒检测呈阳性的关联越来越大,风险比[RR](每增加10岁)从0.81增加到0.6(住院RR分别从1.18增加到2.63)。

结论

我们的数据驱动方法表明,疫情时间在识别与检测呈阳性和住院相关的风险因素方面发挥作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/10063645/5e9b7f67535a/43856_2023_271_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/10063645/c50d33f17764/43856_2023_271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/10063645/1975a0e57cb3/43856_2023_271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/10063645/ec993c3a527c/43856_2023_271_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/10063645/5e9b7f67535a/43856_2023_271_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/10063645/c50d33f17764/43856_2023_271_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/10063645/1975a0e57cb3/43856_2023_271_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/10063645/ec993c3a527c/43856_2023_271_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1014/10063645/5e9b7f67535a/43856_2023_271_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prioritization of COVID-19 risk factors in July 2020 and February 2021 in the UK.2020年7月和2021年2月英国新冠病毒病风险因素的优先级划分
Commun Med (Lond). 2023 Mar 30;3(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s43856-023-00271-3.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Authors' response: Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany: potential for bias.作者回复:在德国首次大流行期间,工人的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 感染风险:潜在的偏见。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022 Sep 1;48(7):588-590. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.4061. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
4
Association of Maternal Perinatal SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Neonatal Outcomes During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Massachusetts.马萨诸塞州 COVID-19 大流行期间产妇围生期 SARS-CoV-2 感染与新生儿结局的相关性。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e217523. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7523.
5
Risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multiethnic cohort of United Kingdom healthcare workers (UK-REACH): A cross-sectional analysis.与英国医疗保健工作者多民族队列中 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的风险因素(UK-REACH):一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004015. eCollection 2022 May.
6
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of four different strategies for SARS-CoV-2 surveillance in the general population (CoV-Surv Study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a cluster-randomised, two-factorial controlled trial.在普通人群中进行 SARS-CoV-2 监测的四种不同策略的有效性和成本效益(CoV-Surv 研究):一项关于集群随机、双因素对照试验的研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 8;22(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04982-z.
7
Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank.SARS-CoV-2 感染的种族和社会经济差异:使用英国生物库的前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Med. 2020 May 29;18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01640-8.
8
Chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine for prevention and treatment of COVID-19.氯喹或羟氯喹预防和治疗 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 12;2(2):CD013587. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013587.pub2.
9
SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and Construction Industry: insights from Italian data.SARS-CoV-2 大流行与建筑行业:来自意大利数据的洞察。
Acta Biomed. 2022 Jul 1;93(3):e2022233. doi: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.12265.
10
Workplace interventions to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection outside of healthcare settings.工作场所干预措施以降低医疗机构外 SARS-CoV-2 感染的风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 10;4(4):CD015112. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015112.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
The demographic and socioeconomic correlates of behavior and HIV infection status across sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区行为与艾滋病毒感染状况的人口统计学和社会经济关联因素。
Commun Med (Lond). 2022 Aug 18;2:104. doi: 10.1038/s43856-022-00170-z. eCollection 2022.
2
Development and validation of a population-based risk stratification model for severe COVID-19 in the general population.一般人群中重症 COVID-19 的基于人群的风险分层模型的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 28;12(1):3277. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07138-y.
3
Evolving mortality and clinical outcomes of hospitalized subjects during successive COVID-19 waves in Catalonia, Spain.
西班牙加泰罗尼亚地区在连续几波新冠疫情期间住院患者的死亡率变化及临床结局
Glob Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;4:100071. doi: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100071. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
4
Performance of Three Measures of Comorbidity in Predicting Critical COVID-19: A Retrospective Analysis of 4607 Hospitalized Patients.三种合并症测量方法在预测重症新型冠状病毒肺炎中的表现:对4607例住院患者的回顾性分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 Nov 23;14:4729-4737. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S326132. eCollection 2021.
5
Leveraging vibration of effects analysis for robust discovery in observational biomedical data science.利用效应分析的振动进行稳健的观测生物医学数据科学发现。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Sep 23;19(9):e3001398. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001398. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Mapping the human genetic architecture of COVID-19.绘制人类 COVID-19 遗传结构图谱。
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7889):472-477. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03767-x. Epub 2021 Jul 8.
7
Selection into shift work is influenced by educational attainment and body mass index: a Mendelian randomization study in the UK Biobank.选择轮班工作受教育程度和体重指数的影响:英国生物库中的一项孟德尔随机研究。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug 30;50(4):1229-1240. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyab031.
8
Prevalence and determinants of hypertension control among almost 100 000 treated adults in the UK.英国近 10 万治疗成年人中高血压控制的流行率及其决定因素。
Open Heart. 2021 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001461.
9
Reflection on modern methods: demystifying robust standard errors for epidemiologists.反思现代方法:为流行病学家揭开稳健标准误的神秘面纱。
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Mar 3;50(1):346-351. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa260.
10
Occupation and risk of severe COVID-19: prospective cohort study of 120 075 UK Biobank participants.职业与重症新型冠状病毒肺炎风险:对120075名英国生物银行参与者的前瞻性队列研究
Occup Environ Med. 2020 Dec 9;78(5):307-14. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2020-106731.