Suppr超能文献

使用SIM-EDI工具探索模拟项目中的公平、多样性和包容性:一种反思性工具对模拟教育工作者的影响

Exploring equity, diversity, and inclusion in a simulation program using the SIM-EDI tool: the impact of a reflexive tool for simulation educators.

作者信息

Purdy Eve, Symon Ben, Marks Ruth-Ellen, Speirs Chris, Brazil Victoria

机构信息

Gold Coast Hospital and Health Service, Southport, QLD, Australia.

Bond University, Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Adv Simul (Lond). 2023 Mar 31;8(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s41077-023-00250-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There have been increasing calls for awareness and action related to equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in simulation but a lack of practical guidance for how simulation delivery teams (SDTs) might move towards meaningful transformation. The gap between academic conversations about EDI and how to practically impact SDT attitudes, behaviors, and performance remains considerable. We designed a conversational tool, the SIM-EDI, to bridge the gap between theory and practice for SDTs by enhancing reflexivity and studied its impact locally.

METHODS

We engaged in a collaborative autoethnography to explore EDI within our emergency department SDT shortly after implementing the SIM-EDI. The 12-month ethnography is informed by our team's collection and analysis of data about ourselves and our own experiences using the tool. Data included serial interviews, field notes from simulations and SDT meetings, SDT documents, and self-reflections.

RESULTS

We found the SIM-EDI tool could be implemented with a team with a high level of readiness. Use of the tool had several meaningful impacts including enhanced team reflexivity, normalization of conversations related to EDI and increased confidence to engage in EDI conversations with participants. Key themes throughout the process included (1) individual and team growth, (2) fear of "getting it wrong", and (3) tension between bias towards action and need for slow reflection.

CONCLUSION

The SIM-EDI tool can effectively promote reflexivity among faculty in an emergency department simulation program. The tool is easy to use and implement, impacts attitudes and behaviors, and facilitates individual and team growth.

摘要

背景

在模拟领域,人们对公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)的认识及行动的呼声日益高涨,但对于模拟实施团队(SDT)如何实现有意义的转变,却缺乏实际指导。关于EDI的学术讨论与如何切实影响SDT的态度、行为和表现之间的差距仍然很大。我们设计了一种对话工具SIM-EDI,通过增强反思性来弥合SDT理论与实践之间的差距,并在本地研究了其影响。

方法

在实施SIM-EDI后不久,我们开展了一项合作性的自我民族志研究,以探索急诊科SDT内部的EDI情况。这项为期12个月的民族志研究基于我们团队收集和分析的关于自身以及使用该工具的经历的数据。数据包括系列访谈、模拟和SDT会议的现场记录、SDT文件以及自我反思。

结果

我们发现SIM-EDI工具可以在准备充分的团队中实施。该工具的使用产生了一些有意义的影响,包括增强了团队反思性、使与EDI相关的对话常态化,以及增加了与参与者进行EDI对话的信心。整个过程中的关键主题包括:(1)个人和团队成长;(2)对“犯错”的恐惧;(3)行动偏向与缓慢反思需求之间的紧张关系。

结论

SIM-EDI工具可以有效地促进急诊科模拟项目中教员的反思性。该工具易于使用和实施,能影响态度和行为,并促进个人和团队成长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c8b/10067255/e33cd532f9cb/41077_2023_250_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验