• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农业生态学可以在不影响小农户系统产量的情况下促进气候变化适应成果。

Agroecology Can Promote Climate Change Adaptation Outcomes Without Compromising Yield In Smallholder Systems.

机构信息

Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Calí, Colombia.

International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Texcoco, Mexico.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2023 Aug;72(2):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01816-x. Epub 2023 Apr 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-023-01816-x
PMID:37004534
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10287806/
Abstract

A critical question is whether agroecology can promote climate change mitigation and adaptation outcomes without compromising food security. We assessed the outcomes of smallholder agricultural systems and practices in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) against 35 mitigation, adaptation, and yield indicators by reviewing 50 articles with 77 cases of agroecological treatments relative to a baseline of conventional practices. Crop yields were higher for 63% of cases reporting yields. Crop diversity, income diversity, net income, reduced income variability, nutrient regulation, and reduced pest infestation, indicators of adaptative capacity, were associated with 70% or more of cases. Limited information on climate change mitigation, such as greenhouse gas emissions and carbon sequestration impacts, was available. Overall, the evidence indicates that use of organic nutrient sources, diversifying systems with legumes and integrated pest management lead to climate change adaptation in multiple contexts. Landscape mosaics, biological control (e.g., enhancement of beneficial organisms) and field sanitation measures do not yet have sufficient evidence based on this review. Widespread adoption of agroecological practices and system transformations shows promise to contribute to climate change services and food security in LMICs. Gaps in adaptation and mitigation strategies and areas for policy and research interventions are finally discussed.

摘要

一个关键问题是,农业生态学能否在不损害粮食安全的情况下促进气候变化缓解和适应成果。我们评估了低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)小农户农业系统和实践的成果,共审查了 50 篇文章,其中有 77 个案例涉及与常规做法基准相比的农业生态处理方法,涉及 35 个缓解、适应和产量指标。有 63%的报告产量的案例显示作物产量更高。作物多样性、收入多样性、净收入、收入变化减少、养分调节和减少虫害,这些适应能力的指标与 70%或更多的案例有关。关于气候变化缓解的信息有限,例如温室气体排放和碳封存影响。总的来说,证据表明,在多种情况下,使用有机养分来源、通过豆类和综合虫害管理来多样化系统,会导致气候变化适应。景观镶嵌、生物控制(例如,有益生物的增强)和田间卫生措施在基于本综述的基础上还没有足够的证据。农业生态学实践和系统转型的广泛采用有望为 LMICs 的气候变化服务和粮食安全做出贡献。最后讨论了适应和缓解战略的差距以及政策和研究干预的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbba/10287806/527c253c5fa1/267_2023_1816_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbba/10287806/28ceb4c2fba6/267_2023_1816_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbba/10287806/bdfc1bb5e6c9/267_2023_1816_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbba/10287806/f56fbb7f3464/267_2023_1816_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbba/10287806/527c253c5fa1/267_2023_1816_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbba/10287806/28ceb4c2fba6/267_2023_1816_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbba/10287806/bdfc1bb5e6c9/267_2023_1816_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbba/10287806/f56fbb7f3464/267_2023_1816_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fbba/10287806/527c253c5fa1/267_2023_1816_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Agroecology Can Promote Climate Change Adaptation Outcomes Without Compromising Yield In Smallholder Systems.农业生态学可以在不影响小农户系统产量的情况下促进气候变化适应成果。
Environ Manage. 2023 Aug;72(2):333-342. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01816-x. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
2
Delivering Climate Change Outcomes with Agroecology in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Evidence and Actions Needed在低收入和中等收入国家通过农业生态学实现气候变化目标:所需证据与行动
3
Impact, adaptation, and mitigation of climate change in Indian agriculture.气候变化对印度农业的影响、适应和缓解。
Environ Monit Assess. 2022 Nov 1;195(1):52. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10537-3.
4
Quantifying opportunities for greenhouse gas emissions mitigation using big data from smallholder crop and livestock farmers across Bangladesh.利用孟加拉国小农作物和牲畜农民的大数据量化温室气体减排机会。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Sep 10;786:147344. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147344. Epub 2021 Apr 29.
5
Agroecological practices in combination with healthy diets can help meet EU food system policy targets.农业生态实践与健康饮食相结合,有助于实现欧盟食品系统政策目标。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Nov 15;847:157612. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157612. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
6
Health Risks and Costs of Climate Variability and Change气候变率与变化带来的健康风险及成本
7
Climate impacts on European agriculture and water management in the context of adaptation and mitigation--the importance of an integrated approach.气候变化对欧洲农业和水管理的影响,涉及适应和缓解措施——综合方法的重要性。
Sci Total Environ. 2010 Nov 1;408(23):5667-87. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.05.002. Epub 2009 Jun 5.
8
A meta-analysis of economic and environmental benefits of conservation agriculture in South Asia.南亚保护性农业的经济和环境效益的荟萃分析。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Sep 1;269:110773. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110773. Epub 2020 May 21.
9
Greenhouse gas emissions reduction in different economic sectors: Mitigation measures, health co-benefits, knowledge gaps, and policy implications.不同经济部门的温室气体减排:缓解措施、健康协同效益、知识差距和政策影响。
Environ Pollut. 2018 Sep;240:683-698. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 May 26.
10
How much land-based greenhouse gas mitigation can be achieved without compromising food security and environmental goals?在不影响粮食安全和环境目标的情况下,能实现多少陆基温室气体减排?
Glob Chang Biol. 2013 Aug;19(8):2285-302. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12160. Epub 2013 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Climate Change Adaptation in Enhancing Household Food Security: A Case Study of the Hamassa Watershed Agroecologies, Southern Ethiopia.气候变化适应在加强家庭粮食安全中的作用:以埃塞俄比亚南部哈马萨流域农业生态为例
F1000Res. 2025 Feb 11;14:188. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.160204.1. eCollection 2025.
2
Community-serving research addressing climate change impacts on vector-borne diseases.服务社区的研究,旨在解决气候变化对虫媒传染病的影响。
Lancet Planet Health. 2024 May;8(5):e334-e341. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(24)00049-4.
3
Dare to be resilient: the key to future pesticide-free orchards?

本文引用的文献

1
Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.食物系统产生的温室气体排放量占全球人为温室气体排放总量的三分之一。
Nat Food. 2021 Mar;2(3):198-209. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
2
Agricultural diversification promotes multiple ecosystem services without compromising yield.农业多样化可促进多种生态系统服务,同时又不影响产量。
Sci Adv. 2020 Nov 4;6(45). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba1715. Print 2020 Nov.
3
A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture.有机农业和保护性农业生产力稳定性的全球荟萃分析。
敢于坚韧不拔:未来无农药果园的关键?
J Exp Bot. 2024 Jul 10;75(13):3835-3848. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae150.
4
Adapting crop production to climate change and air pollution at different scales.在不同尺度上使作物生产适应气候变化和空气污染。
Nat Food. 2023 Oct;4(10):854-865. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00858-y. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
Nat Commun. 2018 Sep 7;9(1):3632. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05956-1.
4
Field-scale experiments reveal persistent yield gaps in low-input and organic cropping systems.田间尺度实验揭示了低投入和有机种植系统中持续存在的产量差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 31;114(5):926-931. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612311114. Epub 2017 Jan 17.