Mclaughlin Matthew, Campbell Elizabeth, Sutherland Rachel, McKenzie Tom, Davies Lynda, Wiggers John, Wolfenden Luke
School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Hunter New England Population Health, Wallsend, NSW, Australia.
Front Health Serv. 2021 Nov 17;1:719194. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2021.719194. eCollection 2021.
Few studies have described the extent, type and reasons for making changes to a program prior to and during its delivery using a consistent taxonomy. Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) is a secondary school physical activity program that was scaled-up for delivery to a greater number of schools. We aimed to describe the extent, type and reasons for changes to the PA4E1 program (the evidence-based physical activity practices, implementation support strategies and evaluation methods) made before its delivery at scale (adaptations) and during its delivery in a scale-up trial (modifications). The Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced (FRAME) was used to describe (planned and made prior to the scale-up trial) and (made during the conduct of the trial). A list of adaptations was generated from a comparison of the efficacy and scale-up trials via published PA4E1 protocols, trial registrations and information provided by trial investigators. Monthly trial team meetings tracked and coded modifications in "real-time" during the conduct of the scale-up trial. The extent, type and reasons for both adaptations and modifications were summarized descriptively. In total, 20 and 20 were identified, these were to physical activity practices ( = 8; = 3), implementation support strategies ( = 6; = 16) and evaluation methods ( = 6, = 1), respectively. Few adaptations were "fidelity inconsistent" ( = 2), made "unsystematically" ( = 1) and proposed to have a "negative" impact on the effectiveness of the program ( = 1). Reasons for the adaptations varied. Of the 20 modifications, all were "fidelity consistent" and the majority were made "proactively" ( = 12), though most were "unsystematic" ( = 18). Fifteen of the modifications were thought to have a "positive" impact on program effectiveness. The main reason for modification was the "available resources" ( = 14) of the PA4E1 Implementation Team. Adaptations and modifications to public health programs are common. Modifications have the potential to impact the implementation and effectiveness of programs. Our findings underscore the importance of comprehensive reporting of the extent, type and reasons for modifications as part of process evaluations, as this data may be important to the interpretation of trial findings. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372870, Identifier ACTRN12617000681358.
很少有研究使用一致的分类法描述在项目交付之前和期间对其进行更改的程度、类型和原因。“全民体育活动”(PA4E1)是一项中学体育活动项目,已扩大规模以推广至更多学校。我们旨在描述在PA4E1项目大规模交付之前(适应性调整)和在扩大规模试验期间(修改)对该项目(基于证据的体育活动实践、实施支持策略和评估方法)进行更改的程度、类型和原因。使用增强版的报告适应性调整和修改框架(FRAME)来描述(在扩大规模试验之前计划并进行的)适应性调整和(在试验进行期间进行的)修改。通过已发表的PA4E1方案、试验注册信息以及试验研究者提供的信息,对比疗效试验和扩大规模试验,生成了一份适应性调整清单。在扩大规模试验进行期间,试验团队每月的会议对修改进行“实时”跟踪和编码。对适应性调整和修改的程度、类型和原因进行了描述性总结。总共确定了2个适应性调整和20个修改,分别涉及体育活动实践(适应性调整 = 8;修改 = 3)、实施支持策略(适应性调整 = 6;修改 = 16)和评估方法(适应性调整 = 6,修改 = 1)。很少有适应性调整是“保真度不一致的”( = 2),是“非系统性地”做出的( = 1),并且被认为会对项目有效性产生“负面”影响( = 1)。适应性调整的原因各不相同。在20个修改中,所有修改都是“保真度一致的”,并且大多数是“主动做出的”( = 12),尽管大多数是“非系统性的”( = 18)。其中15个修改被认为会对项目有效性产生“积极”影响。修改的主要原因是PA4E1实施团队的“可用资源”( = 14)。对公共卫生项目的适应性调整和修改很常见。修改有可能影响项目的实施和有效性。我们的研究结果强调了在过程评估中全面报告修改的程度、类型和原因的重要性,因为这些数据对于解释试验结果可能很重要。https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372870,标识符ACTRN12617000681358。