• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用IBS®宫内Bigatti刨削器进行宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:转速和抽吸流速影响的回顾性比较分析

Hysteroscopic myomectomy with the IBS® Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of the impact of rotational speed and aspiration flow rate.

作者信息

Zhang S, Di W, Wang Y, Shi J, Yin X, Zhang Y, Zhao A, Campo R, Bigatti G

出版信息

Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Mar;15(1):53-59. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.1.063.

DOI:10.52054/FVVO.15.1.063
PMID:37010335
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10392109/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myoma removal remains a challenge hysteroscopically including for the "IBS®" Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver technique.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the Intrauterine IBS® instrument settings and the myoma size and type are prognostic factors for the complete removal of submucous myomas using this technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at the San Giuseppe University Teaching Hospital Milan, Italy; Ospedale Centrale di Bolzano - Azienda Ospedaliera del Sud Tirolo Bolzano, Italy (Group A) and the Sino European Life Expert Centre-Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China (Group B). In Group A: surgeries were performed between June 2009 and January 2018 on 107 women using an IBS device set to a rotational speed of 2,500 rpm and an aspiration flow rate of 250ml/min. In Group B: surgeries were performed between July 2019 and March 2021 on 84 women with the instrument setting to a rotational speed of 1,500 rpm and aspiration flow rate of 500 ml/min. Further subgroup analysis was performed based on fibroid size:<3 cm and 3-5 cm. Both Groups A and B were similar in terms of patient age, parity, symptoms, myoma type and size. Submucous myomas were classified according to the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy classification. All patients underwent a myomectomy with the IBS® under general anaesthesia. The conventional 22 Fr. Bipolar Resectoscope was used in cases requiring conversion to the resection technique. All surgeries were planned, performed and followed by the same surgeon in both institutions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Complete resection rates, total operation time, resection time and used fluid volume.

RESULTS

Complete resection with the IBS® Shaver was seen in 93/107 (86.91%) in Group A versus 83/84 (98.8 %) in Group B (P=0.0021). Five patients (5.8%) in Subgroup A1 (<3 cm) and nine patients (42.9%) in Subgroup A2 (3cm5cm) could not be finished with the IBS (P<0.001, RR=2.439), while in Group B only one case (8.3%) in Subgroup B2 (3cm5cm) underwent a conversion to bipolar resectoscope (Group A: 14/107=13.08% vs. Group B: 1/84=1.19%, P=0.0024). For <3cm myomas (subgroup A1 versus B1) there was a statistically significant difference in terms of resection time (7.75±6.363 vs. 17.28±12.19, P<0.001), operation time (17.81 ± 8.18 vs. 28.19 ±17.614, P<0.001) and total amount of fluid used (3365.63 ± 2212.319 ml vs. 5800.00 ± 8422.878 ml, P<0.05) in favour of Subgroup B1. For larger myomas, a statistical difference was only observed for the total operative time (51.00±14.298 min vs. 30.50±12.122 min, P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

For hysteroscopic myomectomy using the IBS®, 1,500rpm rotational speed and 500ml/min aspiration flow rate are recommended as these settings result in more complete resections compared to the conventional settings. In addition, these settings are associated with a reduction in total operating time.

WHAT IS NEW?: Reducing the rotational speed rate from 2500 rpm to 1500 rpm and increasing the aspiration flow rate from 250 ml/min to 500 ml/min improve complete resection rates and reduce operating times.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad53/10392109/c6084e5d7403/FVVinObGyn-15-53-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad53/10392109/c6084e5d7403/FVVinObGyn-15-53-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad53/10392109/c6084e5d7403/FVVinObGyn-15-53-g001.jpg
摘要

背景

子宫肌瘤切除术在宫腔镜下仍然是一项挑战,包括使用“IBS®”宫腔内比加蒂刨削器技术。

目的

评估宫腔内IBS®器械设置以及肌瘤大小和类型是否是使用该技术完全切除黏膜下肌瘤的预后因素。

材料与方法

本研究在意大利米兰圣朱塞佩大学教学医院、意大利博尔扎诺中央医院 - 南蒂罗尔省医院集团(A组)以及中国上海中欧生命科学专家中心 - 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院(B组)进行。A组:2009年6月至2018年1月期间,对107名女性使用IBS设备进行手术,设置转速为2500转/分钟,抽吸流速为250毫升/分钟。B组:2019年7月至2021年3月期间,对84名女性进行手术,器械设置转速为1500转/分钟,抽吸流速为500毫升/分钟。根据肌瘤大小进一步进行亚组分析:<3厘米和3 - 5厘米。A组和B组在患者年龄、产次、症状、肌瘤类型和大小方面相似。黏膜下肌瘤根据欧洲妇科内镜学会分类进行分类。所有患者在全身麻醉下使用IBS®进行肌瘤切除术。在需要转换为切除技术的情况下使用传统的22 Fr.双极电切镜。两个机构的所有手术均由同一位外科医生计划、实施和随访。

主要观察指标

完全切除率、总手术时间、切除时间和使用的液体量。

结果

A组107例中有93例(86.91%)使用IBS®刨削器完全切除,而B组84例中有83例(98.8%)(P = 0.0021)。A1亚组(<3厘米)中的5例患者(5.8%)和A2亚组(3厘米至5厘米)中的9例患者(42.9%)无法用IBS完成手术(P < 0.001,RR = 2.439),而B组中只有B2亚组(3厘米至5厘米)的1例患者(8.3%)转换为双极电切镜(A组:14/107 = 13.08% vs. B组:1/84 = 1.19%,P = 0.0024)。对于<3厘米的肌瘤(A1亚组与B1亚组),在切除时间(7.75±6.363 vs. 17.28±12.19,P < 0.001)、手术时间(17.81 ± 8.18 vs. 28.19 ±17.614,P < 0.001)和使用的液体总量(3365.63 ± 2212.319毫升 vs. 5800.00 ± 8422.878毫升,P < 0.05)方面存在统计学差异,有利于B1亚组。对于较大的肌瘤,仅在总手术时间方面观察到统计学差异(51.00±14.298分钟 vs. 30.50±12.122分钟,P = 0.003)。

结论

对于使用IBS®进行宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术,建议转速为1500转/分钟,抽吸流速为500毫升/分钟,因为与传统设置相比,这些设置可实现更完全的切除。此外,这些设置与总手术时间的减少相关。

新发现是什么?:将转速从2500转/分钟降低到1500转/分钟,将抽吸流速从250毫升/分钟增加到500毫升/分钟可提高完全切除率并减少手术时间。

相似文献

1
Hysteroscopic myomectomy with the IBS® Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of the impact of rotational speed and aspiration flow rate.使用IBS®宫内Bigatti刨削器进行宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:转速和抽吸流速影响的回顾性比较分析
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Mar;15(1):53-59. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.1.063.
2
Hysteroscopic morcellation versus bipolar resection for removal of type 0 and 1 submucous myomas: A randomized trial.宫腔镜下肌瘤旋切术与双极电切术治疗 0 型和 1 型黏膜下肌瘤:一项随机试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Apr;259:32-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.050. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
3
Hysteroscopic Myomectomy of Large Submucous Myomas in a 1-Step Procedure Using Multiple Slicing Sessions Technique.采用多次切片技术一步法行宫腔镜下大的黏膜下肌瘤切除术
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Nov-Dec;22(7):1196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.06.008. Epub 2015 Jun 18.
4
One-Step Resection via Hysteroscopic Myomectomy and Prostaglandin F2α for Large Submucosal Myoma.经宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术和前列腺素 F2α 治疗大型黏膜下子宫肌瘤的一步切除法。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 May-Jun;27(4):826-831. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.05.026. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
5
Operative hysteroscopy with the Bigatti shaver (IBS ®) for the removal of placental remnants.使用比加蒂刨削器(IBS®)进行手术宫腔镜检查以清除胎盘残留。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):153-159.
6
Transrectal ultrasound-guided hysteroscopic myomectomy of submucosal myomas with a varying degree of myometrial penetration.经直肠超声引导下宫腔镜治疗不同程度肌层浸润的黏膜下子宫肌瘤
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2013 Sep-Oct;20(5):672-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.05.001. Epub 2013 Jul 11.
7
Submucous myomas: a new presurgical classification to evaluate the viability of hysteroscopic surgical treatment--preliminary report.黏膜下肌瘤:一种评估宫腔镜手术治疗可行性的新术前分类——初步报告
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):308-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.05.014.
8
The 19 Fr. Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver (IBS®): a clinical and technical update.19 Fr. 宫内比加蒂剃须刀(IBS®):临床与技术更新
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Sep;10(3):161-164.
9
A new system to classify submucous myomas: a Brazilian multicenter study.一种新的黏膜下肌瘤分类系统:一项巴西多中心研究。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2012 Sep-Oct;19(5):575-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2012.03.026. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
10
Intrauterine adhesion after hysteroscopic myomectomy of submucous myomas.宫腔镜下黏膜下子宫肌瘤剔除术后宫腔粘连。
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2023 Feb;49(2):675-681. doi: 10.1111/jog.15499. Epub 2022 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
A new uterine endometrium preservation hysteroscopic myomectomy: Introduction of improved procedures and a retrospective analysis of 94 cases.一种新的保留子宫内膜的宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:改良手术方法介绍及94例回顾性分析
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2024 Nov 14;24:100354. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2024.100354. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Hysteroscopic tissue removal systems for the treatment of intrauterine pathology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.用于治疗子宫内病变的宫腔镜组织切除系统:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2018 Dec;10(4):207-213.
2
Laparoscopic Myomectomy: An Alternative Approach to Tackling Submucous Myomas?腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术:治疗黏膜下子宫肌瘤的另一种方法?
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020 Jan;27(1):155-159. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.03.015. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
3
Hysteroscopic tissue removal system (MyoSure) for the resection of polyps, sub-mucosal leiomyomas and retained products of conception in an out-patient setting: A single UK institution experience.
门诊环境下用于切除息肉、黏膜下平滑肌瘤和残留妊娠物的宫腔镜组织切除系统(MyoSure):英国一家机构的单中心经验
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Dec;231:147-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.10.030. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
4
Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal Systems: A Randomized In Vitro Comparison.宫腔镜组织切除系统:一项随机体外比较研究
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Jan 1;24(1):159-164. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.08.829. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
5
Hysteroscopy and the treatment of uterine fibroids.宫腔镜检查及子宫肌瘤的治疗。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Oct;29(7):920-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Apr 1.
6
A 4-cm G2 cervical submucosal myoma removed with the IBS® Integrated Bigatti Shaver.使用IBS®集成比加蒂剃须刀切除的一个4厘米的G2宫颈黏膜下肌瘤。
Gynecol Surg. 2012 Nov;9(4):453-456. doi: 10.1007/s10397-012-0737-5. Epub 2012 Mar 3.
7
Hysteroscopic myomectomy: a comprehensive review of surgical techniques.宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:手术技术的全面综述
Hum Reprod Update. 2008 Mar-Apr;14(2):101-19. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmm041. Epub 2007 Dec 6.
8
The Intra Uterine Morcellator: a new hysteroscopic operating technique to remove intrauterine polyps and myomas.宫内肌瘤粉碎器:一种切除子宫内膜息肉和肌瘤的新型宫腔镜手术技术。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):62-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.011.
9
[Intraoperative complications of 697 consecutive operative hysteroscopies].[697例连续宫腔镜手术的术中并发症]
Minerva Ginecol. 2001 Feb;53(1):13-20.
10
Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study.宫腔镜检查的并发症:一项前瞻性多中心研究。
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):266-70. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00865-6.