Suppr超能文献

使用IBS®宫内Bigatti刨削器进行宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术:转速和抽吸流速影响的回顾性比较分析

Hysteroscopic myomectomy with the IBS® Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis of the impact of rotational speed and aspiration flow rate.

作者信息

Zhang S, Di W, Wang Y, Shi J, Yin X, Zhang Y, Zhao A, Campo R, Bigatti G

出版信息

Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Mar;15(1):53-59. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.1.063.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Myoma removal remains a challenge hysteroscopically including for the "IBS®" Intrauterine Bigatti Shaver technique.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the Intrauterine IBS® instrument settings and the myoma size and type are prognostic factors for the complete removal of submucous myomas using this technology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was conducted at the San Giuseppe University Teaching Hospital Milan, Italy; Ospedale Centrale di Bolzano - Azienda Ospedaliera del Sud Tirolo Bolzano, Italy (Group A) and the Sino European Life Expert Centre-Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Affiliated Renji Hospital, Shanghai, China (Group B). In Group A: surgeries were performed between June 2009 and January 2018 on 107 women using an IBS device set to a rotational speed of 2,500 rpm and an aspiration flow rate of 250ml/min. In Group B: surgeries were performed between July 2019 and March 2021 on 84 women with the instrument setting to a rotational speed of 1,500 rpm and aspiration flow rate of 500 ml/min. Further subgroup analysis was performed based on fibroid size:<3 cm and 3-5 cm. Both Groups A and B were similar in terms of patient age, parity, symptoms, myoma type and size. Submucous myomas were classified according to the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy classification. All patients underwent a myomectomy with the IBS® under general anaesthesia. The conventional 22 Fr. Bipolar Resectoscope was used in cases requiring conversion to the resection technique. All surgeries were planned, performed and followed by the same surgeon in both institutions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Complete resection rates, total operation time, resection time and used fluid volume.

RESULTS

Complete resection with the IBS® Shaver was seen in 93/107 (86.91%) in Group A versus 83/84 (98.8 %) in Group B (P=0.0021). Five patients (5.8%) in Subgroup A1 (<3 cm) and nine patients (42.9%) in Subgroup A2 (3cm5cm) could not be finished with the IBS (P<0.001, RR=2.439), while in Group B only one case (8.3%) in Subgroup B2 (3cm5cm) underwent a conversion to bipolar resectoscope (Group A: 14/107=13.08% vs. Group B: 1/84=1.19%, P=0.0024). For <3cm myomas (subgroup A1 versus B1) there was a statistically significant difference in terms of resection time (7.75±6.363 vs. 17.28±12.19, P<0.001), operation time (17.81 ± 8.18 vs. 28.19 ±17.614, P<0.001) and total amount of fluid used (3365.63 ± 2212.319 ml vs. 5800.00 ± 8422.878 ml, P<0.05) in favour of Subgroup B1. For larger myomas, a statistical difference was only observed for the total operative time (51.00±14.298 min vs. 30.50±12.122 min, P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

For hysteroscopic myomectomy using the IBS®, 1,500rpm rotational speed and 500ml/min aspiration flow rate are recommended as these settings result in more complete resections compared to the conventional settings. In addition, these settings are associated with a reduction in total operating time.

WHAT IS NEW?: Reducing the rotational speed rate from 2500 rpm to 1500 rpm and increasing the aspiration flow rate from 250 ml/min to 500 ml/min improve complete resection rates and reduce operating times.

摘要

背景

子宫肌瘤切除术在宫腔镜下仍然是一项挑战,包括使用“IBS®”宫腔内比加蒂刨削器技术。

目的

评估宫腔内IBS®器械设置以及肌瘤大小和类型是否是使用该技术完全切除黏膜下肌瘤的预后因素。

材料与方法

本研究在意大利米兰圣朱塞佩大学教学医院、意大利博尔扎诺中央医院 - 南蒂罗尔省医院集团(A组)以及中国上海中欧生命科学专家中心 - 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院(B组)进行。A组:2009年6月至2018年1月期间,对107名女性使用IBS设备进行手术,设置转速为2500转/分钟,抽吸流速为250毫升/分钟。B组:2019年7月至2021年3月期间,对84名女性进行手术,器械设置转速为1500转/分钟,抽吸流速为500毫升/分钟。根据肌瘤大小进一步进行亚组分析:<3厘米和3 - 5厘米。A组和B组在患者年龄、产次、症状、肌瘤类型和大小方面相似。黏膜下肌瘤根据欧洲妇科内镜学会分类进行分类。所有患者在全身麻醉下使用IBS®进行肌瘤切除术。在需要转换为切除技术的情况下使用传统的22 Fr.双极电切镜。两个机构的所有手术均由同一位外科医生计划、实施和随访。

主要观察指标

完全切除率、总手术时间、切除时间和使用的液体量。

结果

A组107例中有93例(86.91%)使用IBS®刨削器完全切除,而B组84例中有83例(98.8%)(P = 0.0021)。A1亚组(<3厘米)中的5例患者(5.8%)和A2亚组(3厘米至5厘米)中的9例患者(42.9%)无法用IBS完成手术(P < 0.001,RR = 2.439),而B组中只有B2亚组(3厘米至5厘米)的1例患者(8.3%)转换为双极电切镜(A组:14/107 = 13.08% vs. B组:1/84 = 1.19%,P = 0.0024)。对于<3厘米的肌瘤(A1亚组与B1亚组),在切除时间(7.75±6.363 vs. 17.28±12.19,P < 0.001)、手术时间(17.81 ± 8.18 vs. 28.19 ±17.614,P < 0.001)和使用的液体总量(3365.63 ± 2212.319毫升 vs. 5800.00 ± 8422.878毫升,P < 0.05)方面存在统计学差异,有利于B1亚组。对于较大的肌瘤,仅在总手术时间方面观察到统计学差异(51.00±14.298分钟 vs. 30.50±12.122分钟,P = 0.003)。

结论

对于使用IBS®进行宫腔镜子宫肌瘤切除术,建议转速为1500转/分钟,抽吸流速为500毫升/分钟,因为与传统设置相比,这些设置可实现更完全的切除。此外,这些设置与总手术时间的减少相关。

新发现是什么?:将转速从2500转/分钟降低到1500转/分钟,将抽吸流速从250毫升/分钟增加到500毫升/分钟可提高完全切除率并减少手术时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad53/10392109/c6084e5d7403/FVVinObGyn-15-53-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验