Larsen R J, Seidman E
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Jan;50(1):205-11. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.50.1.205.
In this study we assessed whether the Bem Sex Role Inventory (BSRI) and the PRF ANDRO are appropriate for investigations of gender schema theory (Bem, 1981a). Because these instruments were developed for entirely different theoretical purposes, it is important to empirically examine the validity of these measures for investigating the construct of gender schema. On the basis of the propositions of gender schema theory, we made several predictions about the psychometric properties that should be exhibited by a valid measure of this construct. Responses to the PRF ANDRO and the BSRI were factor analyzed separately for sex-typed and non-sex-typed groups. Results show consistent and theoretically predictable differences in the factor solutions of these two groups. The sex-typed or gender-schematic group obtained bipolar factors, with masculine items loading with one sign, whereas feminine items loaded with the other sign on each factor. Also, sex of subject loaded highly on almost every factor for this group. The non-sex-typed group, however, obtained few such distinctly dichotomous factors, and sex of subject loaded only on the weaker factors. Results are interpreted as providing support for the construct validity of at least the BSRI and the PRF ANDRO for use in researching the implications of this approach.
在本研究中，我们评估了贝姆性别角色量表（BSRI）和PRF男性特质量表是否适用于性别图式理论的研究（贝姆，1981a）。由于这些工具是为完全不同的理论目的而开发的，因此通过实证检验这些测量工具在调查性别图式结构方面的有效性很重要。基于性别图式理论的命题，我们对有效测量该结构应展现的心理测量特性做出了若干预测。对性别类型化和非性别类型化群体分别进行了对PRF男性特质量表和BSRI的反应的因子分析。结果显示，这两组的因子分析结果存在一致且符合理论预测的差异。性别类型化或性别图式化群体得到了两极因子，男性化项目在每个因子上以一种符号载荷，而女性化项目则以另一种符号载荷。此外，该组中几乎每个因子上被试的性别载荷都很高。然而，非性别类型化群体得到的这种明显二分的因子很少，被试的性别仅在较弱的因子上载荷。结果被解释为至少为BSRI和PRF男性特质量表在研究该方法的影响方面的结构效度提供了支持。
