• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过急诊科持续生理监测预测患者失代偿情况。

Predicting patient decompensation from continuous physiologic monitoring in the emergency department.

作者信息

Sundrani Sameer, Chen Julie, Jin Boyang Tom, Abad Zahra Shakeri Hossein, Rajpurkar Pranav, Kim David

机构信息

School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.

出版信息

NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Apr 4;6(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00803-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41746-023-00803-0
PMID:37016152
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10073111/
Abstract

Anticipation of clinical decompensation is essential for effective emergency and critical care. In this study, we develop a multimodal machine learning approach to predict the onset of new vital sign abnormalities (tachycardia, hypotension, hypoxia) in ED patients with normal initial vital signs. Our method combines standard triage data (vital signs, demographics, chief complaint) with features derived from a brief period of continuous physiologic monitoring, extracted via both conventional signal processing and transformer-based deep learning on ECG and PPG waveforms. We study 19,847 adult ED visits, divided into training (75%), validation (12.5%), and a chronologically sequential held-out test set (12.5%). The best-performing models use a combination of engineered and transformer-derived features, predicting in a 90-minute window new tachycardia with AUROC of 0.836 (95% CI, 0.800-0.870), new hypotension with AUROC 0.802 (95% CI, 0.747-0.856), and new hypoxia with AUROC 0.713 (95% CI, 0.680-0.745), in all cases significantly outperforming models using only standard triage data. Salient features include vital sign trends, PPG perfusion index, and ECG waveforms. This approach could improve the triage of apparently stable patients and be applied continuously for the prediction of near-term clinical deterioration.

摘要

预测临床失代偿对于有效的急诊和重症监护至关重要。在本研究中,我们开发了一种多模态机器学习方法,用于预测初始生命体征正常的急诊患者新的生命体征异常(心动过速、低血压、缺氧)的发作。我们的方法将标准分诊数据(生命体征、人口统计学、主要症状)与从短时间连续生理监测中提取的特征相结合,这些特征通过常规信号处理以及基于变压器的深度学习从心电图和光电容积脉搏波描记图(PPG)波形中提取。我们研究了19847例成人急诊就诊病例,分为训练集(75%)、验证集(12.5%)和按时间顺序排列的留出测试集(12.5%)。表现最佳的模型使用了工程特征和基于变压器提取的特征的组合,在90分钟窗口内预测新的心动过速的曲线下面积(AUROC)为0.836(95%置信区间,0.800 - 0.870),新的低血压的AUROC为0.802(95%置信区间,0.747 - 0.856),新的缺氧的AUROC为0.713(95%置信区间,0.680 - 0.745),在所有情况下均显著优于仅使用标准分诊数据的模型。显著特征包括生命体征趋势、PPG灌注指数和心电图波形。这种方法可以改善对看似稳定患者的分诊,并持续应用于近期临床恶化的预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/10073111/e843a46f9a50/41746_2023_803_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/10073111/91c6f85b4316/41746_2023_803_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/10073111/08d001c0eace/41746_2023_803_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/10073111/1a7f3626630c/41746_2023_803_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/10073111/e843a46f9a50/41746_2023_803_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/10073111/91c6f85b4316/41746_2023_803_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/10073111/08d001c0eace/41746_2023_803_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/10073111/1a7f3626630c/41746_2023_803_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78f4/10073111/e843a46f9a50/41746_2023_803_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting patient decompensation from continuous physiologic monitoring in the emergency department.通过急诊科持续生理监测预测患者失代偿情况。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Apr 4;6(1):60. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00803-0.
2
Development and Comparative Performance of Physiologic Monitoring Strategies in the Emergency Department.生理监测策略在急诊科的发展与比较性能。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233712. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33712.
3
4
Emergency department triage prediction of clinical outcomes using machine learning models.运用机器学习模型对急诊科患者临床结局进行分诊预测。
Crit Care. 2019 Feb 22;23(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2351-7.
5
Advantage of Vital Sign Monitoring Using a Wireless Wearable Device for Predicting Septic Shock in Febrile Patients in the Emergency Department: A Machine Learning-Based Analysis.基于机器学习的分析:使用无线可穿戴设备对急诊科发热患者进行生命体征监测在预测感染性休克方面的优势。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Sep 17;22(18):7054. doi: 10.3390/s22187054.
6
Machine learning approaches for predicting disposition of asthma and COPD exacerbations in the ED.机器学习方法在急诊中预测哮喘和 COPD 加重的处置。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;36(9):1650-1654. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.06.062. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
A Gradient Boosting Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Mortality in the Emergency Department Triage: Devising a Nine-Point Triage Score.一种用于预测急诊科分诊早期死亡率的梯度提升机器学习模型:设计九点分诊评分。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Jan;35(1):220-227. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05512-7. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
8
Developing machine learning models to personalize care levels among emergency room patients for hospital admission.开发机器学习模型,为急诊科患者的住院治疗个性化护理水平。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Oct 12;28(11):2423-2432. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab118.
9
Clinical narrative-aware deep neural network for emergency department critical outcome prediction.用于急诊科危急结果预测的临床叙事感知深度神经网络。
J Biomed Inform. 2023 Feb;138:104284. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104284. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
10
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Clinical Outcomes for Children During Emergency Department Triage.基于机器学习的急诊科分诊中儿童临床结局预测。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jan 4;2(1):e186937. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.6937.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming sepsis management: AI-driven innovations in early detection and tailored therapies.变革脓毒症管理:人工智能驱动的早期检测与个性化治疗创新
Crit Care. 2025 Aug 19;29(1):366. doi: 10.1186/s13054-025-05588-0.
2
The Epidemiology of Emergency Calls in a Tertiary Emergency Department for Admitted Patients: A TECOR Study.三级急诊科收治患者的急救电话流行病学:一项TECOR研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 10;13(14):1670. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13141670.
3
Dynamic mortality prediction in critically Ill children during interhospital transports to PICUs using explainable AI.

本文引用的文献

1
ECGAssess: A Python-Based Toolbox to Assess ECG Lead Signal Quality.ECGAssess:一个用于评估心电图导联信号质量的基于Python的工具箱。
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 6;4:847555. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.847555. eCollection 2022.
2
Forecasting adverse surgical events using self-supervised transfer learning for physiological signals.使用自监督迁移学习对生理信号进行不良手术事件预测。
NPJ Digit Med. 2021 Dec 8;4(1):167. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00536-y.
3
A novel artificial intelligence based intensive care unit monitoring system: using physiological waveforms to identify sepsis.
使用可解释人工智能对危重症儿童在转诊至儿科重症监护病房期间的动态死亡率进行预测。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 17;8(1):108. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01465-w.
4
In limbo: Physiological monitoring of emergency department boarders.处于边缘状态:急诊科住院患者的生理监测
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Jun;92:219-221. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.01.077. Epub 2025 Jan 28.
5
Overview of Wearable Healthcare Devices for Clinical Decision Support in the Prehospital Setting.院前环境中用于临床决策支持的可穿戴医疗设备概述。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Dec 22;24(24):8204. doi: 10.3390/s24248204.
6
Machine learning for early dynamic prediction of functional outcome after stroke.用于中风后功能结局早期动态预测的机器学习
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Nov 13;4(1):232. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00666-w.
7
Early detection of deteriorating patients in general wards through continuous contactless vital signs monitoring.通过持续的非接触式生命体征监测早期发现普通病房中病情恶化的患者。
Front Med Technol. 2024 Aug 29;6:1436034. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2024.1436034. eCollection 2024.
8
Population Health and Artificial Intelligence.人口健康与人工智能
JACC Adv. 2024 Jul 4;3(8):101092. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101092. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Triage Performance Across Large Language Models, ChatGPT, and Untrained Doctors in Emergency Medicine: Comparative Study.分诊表现比较:大型语言模型、ChatGPT 和未经训练的急诊医生:一项对比研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 14;26:e53297. doi: 10.2196/53297.
10
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Triage in Hospital Emergency Departments: A Scoping Review.人工智能在医院急诊科分诊中的应用:一项范围综述
Cureus. 2024 May 8;16(5):e59906. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59906. eCollection 2024 May.
一种新型人工智能重症监护监测系统:利用生理波形识别脓毒症。
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Dec 13;379(2212):20200252. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0252. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
4
Systems for recognition and response to deteriorating emergency department patients: a scoping review.识别和应对急诊科病情恶化患者的系统:范围综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 May 22;29(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13049-021-00882-6.
5
Predicting Volume Responsiveness Among Sepsis Patients Using Clinical Data and Continuous Physiological Waveforms.使用临床数据和连续生理波形预测脓毒症患者的容量反应性。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:619-628. eCollection 2020.
6
TOP-Net Prediction Model Using Bidirectional Long Short-term Memory and Medical-Grade Wearable Multisensor System for Tachycardia Onset: Algorithm Development Study.使用双向长短期记忆和医用级可穿戴多传感器系统预测心动过速发作的TOP-Net预测模型:算法开发研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2021 Apr 15;9(4):e18803. doi: 10.2196/18803.
7
An Estimation Method of Continuous Non-Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Waveform Using Photoplethysmography: A U-Net Architecture-Based Approach.基于 U-Net 架构的光电容积脉搏波连续无创动脉血压波形估算方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 7;21(5):1867. doi: 10.3390/s21051867.
8
Deep learning models for the prediction of intraoperative hypotension.深度学习模型在术中低血压预测中的应用。
Br J Anaesth. 2021 Apr;126(4):808-817. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.12.035. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
9
Predicting Progression to Septic Shock in the Emergency Department Using an Externally Generalizable Machine-Learning Algorithm.使用可外部推广的机器学习算法预测急诊科患者进展为感染性休克的情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Apr;77(4):395-406. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.11.007. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
10
Predicting hypotension in the ICU using noninvasive physiological signals.使用非侵入性生理信号预测 ICU 中的低血压。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Feb;129:104120. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104120. Epub 2020 Nov 20.