Oral Technology, Dental School, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Bonn, Welschnonnenstr. 17, 53111, North Rhine-Westphalia, Bonn, Germany.
Department of Orthodontic, Dental School, Medical Faculty, University Hospital of Bonn, 53111, North Rhine-Westphalia, Bonn, Germany.
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3673-3682. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04982-8. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
Although a new super-quick setting polyether impression material has been commercially recently introduced, its properties have not been yet reported. Thus, it was the aim of this study to assess the dimensional stability, tear strength, and elastic recovery of the new material and to compare it with another commonly used polyether and polyvinyl siloxane.
A new super-quick set polyether, a regular set polyether and a polyvinylsiloxane (PVS) impression material have been used in the study. Dimensional changes were measured using a modified mold as per ISO 4823:2000 after 1 h and 7 days. Tear strength was evaluated by subjecting specimens to tension until failure with a crosshead speed of 250 mm/min. Elastic recovery was measured by deforming specimens using a materials testing machine to a height of 16 mm (20% strain). The change in length (ΔL) was measured afterwards and elastic recovery was calculated in percentages.
Dimensional changes of the super quick and regular set polyether were comparable in both the vertical and horizontal dimensions after 24 h and 7 days. All the tested materials showed dimensional change values far below the maximum accepted ISO requirement (1.5%). The super quick setting polyether showed significantly improved tear strength (4.9 N/mm) in comparison to the regular set polyether (3.5 N/mm) and similar to PVS (5.2 N/mm). The elastic recovery of PVS (99.6%) was the highest among all the groups.
The newly available super-fast set polyether offers a great potential for a reduced chair side time and comfort for both, the patient and the dentist. Super quick polyether showed as well improved tear strength, which is considered one of the shortcomings of the regular set polyether. In addition, the new polyether was as accurate as the regular set polyether and with good elastic recovery.
尽管最近已经推出了一种新型超快速凝固聚醚印模材料,但尚未报道其性能。因此,本研究旨在评估新材料的尺寸稳定性、撕裂强度和弹性回复,并与另一种常用的聚醚和聚硅氧烷进行比较。
本研究使用了一种新型超快速凝固聚醚、常规凝固聚醚和一种聚硅氧烷(PVS)印模材料。根据 ISO 4823:2000,使用改良模具在 1 小时和 7 天后测量尺寸变化。通过以 250mm/min 的十字头速度使试样断裂来评估撕裂强度。通过将材料试验机将试样变形至 16mm(20%应变)的高度来测量弹性回复。随后测量长度变化(ΔL),并以百分比计算弹性回复。
在 24 小时和 7 天后,超快速凝固聚醚和常规凝固聚醚在垂直和水平方向上的尺寸变化均相当。所有测试材料的尺寸变化值均远低于 ISO 要求的最大允许值(1.5%)。新型超快速凝固聚醚的撕裂强度(4.9N/mm)明显优于常规凝固聚醚(3.5N/mm),与 PVS(5.2N/mm)相似。PVS 的弹性回复(99.6%)是所有组中最高的。
新型超快速凝固聚醚具有缩短椅旁时间和提高患者及牙医舒适度的巨大潜力。超快速凝固聚醚的撕裂强度也有所提高,这被认为是常规凝固聚醚的一个缺点。此外,新型聚醚与常规凝固聚醚一样准确,弹性回复良好。