Cecil G Sheps Center for Health Service Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Department of Interior Design & Fashion Studies, College of Health and Human Sciences, Kansas State University, KS, USA.
Geriatr Nurs. 2023 May-Jun;51:253-257. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2023.03.012. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
This cohort study compared rates of COVID-19 infections, admissions/readmissions, and mortality among a statewide person-centered model known as PEAK and non-PEAK NHs.
Rates per 1000 resident days were derived for COVID-19 cases and admissions/readmissions, and per 100 positive cases for mortality. A log-rank test compared rates between PEAK (n = 109) and non-PEAK NHs (n = 112).
Rates of COVID-19 cases, admission, and mortality were higher in non-PEAK compared to PEAK NHs. The median rates for all indicators had a zero value for all NHs, but in NHs above 90th percentiles, the non-PEAK case rate was 3.9 times more and the admission/readmission rate was 2.5 times more.
COVID-19 case, and mortality rates were lower in PEAK than non-PEAK NHs. Although PEAK and non-PEAK NHs may differ in other ways as well, person-centered care may be advantageous to promote infection control and improve outcomes.
本队列研究比较了全州以患者为中心的模式(PEAK)和非-PEAK NH 与 COVID-19 感染、住院/再入院和死亡率之间的比率。
COVID-19 病例和住院/再入院的发生率为每 1000 名居民天,死亡率为每 100 例阳性病例。对数秩检验比较了 PEAK(n=109)和非-PEAK NH(n=112)之间的比率。
非-PEAK 与 PEAK NH 相比,COVID-19 病例、入院和死亡率更高。所有 NH 的所有指标的中位数率均为零,但在第 90 百分位以上的 NH 中,非-PEAK 病例率高出 3.9 倍,住院/再入院率高出 2.5 倍。
PEAK 比非-PEAK NH 的 COVID-19 病例和死亡率更低。尽管 PEAK 和非-PEAK NH 可能在其他方面也有所不同,但以患者为中心的护理可能有利于促进感染控制和改善结果。