Health Outcomes and Economic Evaluation Research Group, Stockholm Centre for Healthcare Ethics, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18 A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Equity and Health Policy Research Group, Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Qual Life Res. 2023 Oct;32(10):2719-2729. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03411-3. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
The visual analogue scale (VAS) has been used in the context of health and healthcare for various purposes, for example, to measure pain and to provide a single-index measure of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This scoping review aims to describe how the VAS has been used for health state valuation in the published literature.
The search was carried out in Medline, Web of Science and PsycInfo. The findings of the included articles were tabulated and presented descriptively using frequencies and proportions.
The database search yielded 4856 unique articles, out of these, 308 were included. In 83% of the articles, the main purpose for using a VAS was to value health states. The two most common perspectives when valuing health states with a VAS were hypothetical (44%) and own health (34%). Some (n = 14) articles used the VAS in the context of economic evaluations, including calculating quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). A large variation in the design of the VAS was found, including the description of the lower and upper anchors. Advantages and disadvantages with using a VAS were mentioned in 14% of the included articles.
The VAS has been a common method for valuing health states, both as a stand-alone method and in combination with other valuation methods. Despite its widespread use, the design of the VAS has been inconsistent which makes comparison of results across studies challenging. Further research on the role of using the VAS in economic evaluations is warranted.
视觉模拟评分(VAS)已在健康和医疗保健领域中用于各种目的,例如测量疼痛以及提供健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)的单一指标测量。本范围综述旨在描述 VAS 在已发表文献中用于健康状况估值的情况。
在 Medline、Web of Science 和 PsycInfo 中进行了搜索。对纳入文章的结果进行了制表,并使用频率和比例进行描述性呈现。
数据库搜索产生了 4856 篇独特的文章,其中 308 篇被纳入。在 83%的文章中,使用 VAS 的主要目的是评估健康状况。使用 VAS 评估健康状况的两个最常见视角是假设(44%)和自身健康(34%)。一些(n=14)文章在经济评估中使用了 VAS,包括计算质量调整生命年(QALYs)。发现 VAS 的设计存在很大差异,包括对下限和上限锚的描述。在 14%的纳入文章中提到了使用 VAS 的优缺点。
VAS 一直是评估健康状况的常用方法,既可以作为独立方法使用,也可以与其他评估方法结合使用。尽管它被广泛使用,但 VAS 的设计不一致,这使得跨研究比较结果具有挑战性。需要进一步研究在经济评估中使用 VAS 的作用。