Dai Xinyi, Yu Dejun
Nantong University School of Medicine, Nantong, China.
Transl Pediatr. 2023 Mar 31;12(3):462-469. doi: 10.21037/tp-23-120. Epub 2023 Mar 27.
Many human mobility restrictions have been adopted during the novel 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Here we explored the effects of psychological interventions on the mental health status of medical students under the regular prevention and control of the pandemic.
By voluntarily participating in interest groups, 121 third-year medical undergraduate students in a university in Jiangsu Province underwent psychological interventions for 1 year. Their mental status was assessed by using Zung's Self-rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS), and Somatic Self-rating Scale (SSS) before and after the interventions. Psychological coping styles were compared by using the trait coping style questionnaire (TCSQ). Each assessment scale is evaluated every 3 months, with the first survey results as the baseline data and compared with the last results. The resulting data was passed by SPSS 23 0 for normal testing and Analysis of Variance (ANOVA).
During the regular response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and somatization symptoms was 25.62% 7.44%, 28.93% 18.18%, and 21.49% 9.92%, respectively, before and after psychological interventions (all P<0.05). The positive (31.73±4.26 38.26±3.72) and negative (27.69±3.19 20.73±2.8) coping styles significantly differed before and after intervention (both P<0.05).
Varying degrees of anxiety, depression, and somatization symptoms can occur in medical students during the regular response to COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting the impact of public health emergencies on college students. Interest group-based psychological intervention, along with individual mental health counseling, can positively promote the mental health of college students and effectively improve their anxiety.
在2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,许多地区都采取了人员流动限制措施。在此,我们探讨了心理干预对疫情常态化防控下医学生心理健康状况的影响。
江苏省某高校的121名医学本科三年级学生通过自愿参加兴趣小组的方式接受了为期1年的心理干预。在干预前后,使用zung氏自评焦虑量表(SAS)、自评抑郁量表(SDS)和躯体自评量表(SSS)对他们的心理状态进行评估。通过特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)比较心理应对方式。每3个月对各评估量表进行一次评估,将第一次调查结果作为基线数据,并与最后一次结果进行比较。所得数据通过SPSS 23.0进行正态性检验和方差分析(ANOVA)。
在对COVID-19大流行的常态化应对期间,心理干预前后焦虑、抑郁和躯体化症状的发生率分别为25.62%±7.44%、7.44%±18.18%和21.49%±9.92%(均P<0.05)。干预前后积极应对方式(31.73±4.26 vs 38.26±3.72)和消极应对方式(27.69±3.19 vs 20.73±2.8)有显著差异(均P<0.05)。
医学生在对COVID-19大流行的常态化应对期间可能出现不同程度的焦虑、抑郁和躯体化症状,凸显了突发公共卫生事件对大学生的影响。基于兴趣小组的心理干预结合个体心理健康咨询,可以积极促进大学生的心理健康,有效改善其焦虑状况。