• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较性临床试验中多重竞争风险的同步假设检验。

Simultaneous hypothesis testing for multiple competing risks in comparative clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Division of Quantitative Sciences, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2023 Jun 30;42(14):2394-2408. doi: 10.1002/sim.9728. Epub 2023 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1002/sim.9728
PMID:37035880
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10315219/
Abstract

Competing risks data are commonly encountered in randomized clinical trials or observational studies. Ignoring competing risks in survival analysis leads to biased risk estimates and improper conclusions. Often, one of the competing events is of primary interest and the rest competing events are handled as nuisances. These approaches can be inadequate when multiple competing events have important clinical interpretations and thus of equal interest. For example, in COVID-19 in-patient treatment trials, the outcomes of COVID-19 related hospitalization are either death or discharge from hospital, which have completely different clinical implications and are of equal interest, especially during the pandemic. In this paper we develop nonparametric estimation and simultaneous inferential methods for multiple cumulative incidence functions (CIFs) and corresponding restricted mean times. Based on Monte Carlo simulations and a data analysis of COVID-19 in-patient treatment clinical trial, we demonstrate that the proposed method provides global insights of the treatment effects across multiple endpoints.

摘要

在随机临床试验或观察性研究中,经常会遇到竞争风险数据。在生存分析中忽略竞争风险会导致有偏差的风险估计和不恰当的结论。通常,其中一个竞争事件是主要关注的,其余的竞争事件则被视为干扰因素。当多个竞争事件具有重要的临床解释且同等重要时,这些方法可能不够充分。例如,在 COVID-19 住院治疗试验中,COVID-19 相关住院的结局要么是死亡,要么是出院,这具有完全不同的临床意义,并且在大流行期间同样重要。在本文中,我们为多个累积发生率函数(CIF)和相应的限制平均时间开发了非参数估计和同时推断方法。基于蒙特卡罗模拟和 COVID-19 住院治疗临床试验的数据分析,我们证明了所提出的方法提供了跨多个终点的治疗效果的全局见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/9eee29279a9a/nihms-1911479-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/01deb2fdbbcd/nihms-1911479-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/e170a7d33d09/nihms-1911479-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/e4ca5405f173/nihms-1911479-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/383083608970/nihms-1911479-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/9eee29279a9a/nihms-1911479-f0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/01deb2fdbbcd/nihms-1911479-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/e170a7d33d09/nihms-1911479-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/e4ca5405f173/nihms-1911479-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/383083608970/nihms-1911479-f0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/adab/10315219/9eee29279a9a/nihms-1911479-f0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Simultaneous hypothesis testing for multiple competing risks in comparative clinical trials.比较性临床试验中多重竞争风险的同步假设检验。
Stat Med. 2023 Jun 30;42(14):2394-2408. doi: 10.1002/sim.9728. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
2
Joint inference for competing risks data using multiple endpoints.使用多个终点对竞争风险数据进行联合推断。
Biometrics. 2023 Sep;79(3):1635-1645. doi: 10.1111/biom.13752. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
3
causalCmprsk: An R package for nonparametric and Cox-based estimation of average treatment effects in competing risks data.因果风险模型:一个用于在竞争风险数据中进行非参数和 Cox 基于估计的平均治疗效果的 R 包。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2023 Dec;242:107819. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107819. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
4
Propensity-score matching with competing risks in survival analysis.生存分析中存在竞争风险的倾向评分匹配。
Stat Med. 2019 Feb 28;38(5):751-777. doi: 10.1002/sim.8008. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
5
Competing time-to-event endpoints in cardiology trials: a simulation study to illustrate the importance of an adequate statistical analysis.心脏病学试验中相互竞争的事件发生时间终点:一项模拟研究以说明充分统计分析的重要性。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Jan;21(1):74-80. doi: 10.1177/2047487312460518. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
6
Analysis and design of randomised clinical trials involving competing risks endpoints.涉及竞争风险终点的随机临床试验的分析与设计。
Trials. 2011 May 19;12:127. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-127.
7
Meta-analysis for aggregated survival data with competing risks: a parametric approach using cumulative incidence functions.具有竞争风险的汇总生存数据的Meta分析:一种使用累积发病率函数的参数方法。
Res Synth Methods. 2016 Sep;7(3):282-93. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1165. Epub 2015 Sep 20.
8
Semiparametric accelerated failure time cure rate mixture models with competing risks.具有竞争风险的半参数加速失效时间治愈率混合模型
Stat Med. 2018 Jan 15;37(1):48-59. doi: 10.1002/sim.7508. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
9
Performing Survival Analyses in the Presence of Competing Risks: A Clinical Example in Older Breast Cancer Patients.存在竞争风险时进行生存分析:老年乳腺癌患者的临床实例。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov 26;108(5). doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv366. Print 2016 May.
10
Estimating restricted mean survival time and expected life-years lost in the presence of competing risks within flexible parametric survival models.在存在竞争风险的情况下,使用灵活参数生存模型估计受限平均生存时间和预期寿命损失。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Mar 11;21(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01213-0.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Quantify and Interpret Treatment Effects in Comparative Clinical Studies of COVID-19.如何在 COVID-19 的比较临床研究中量化和解释治疗效果。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Oct 20;173(8):632-637. doi: 10.7326/M20-4044. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
Remdesivir for the Treatment of Covid-19 - Final Report.瑞德西韦治疗 COVID-19 的疗效 - 最终报告。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 5;383(19):1813-1826. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007764. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
3
On the empirical choice of the time window for restricted mean survival time.限制平均生存时间的时间窗口的经验选择。
Biometrics. 2020 Dec;76(4):1157-1166. doi: 10.1111/biom.13237. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
4
Joint Inference for Competing Risks Survival Data.竞争风险生存数据的联合推断
J Am Stat Assoc. 2016;111(515):1289-1300. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2015.1093942. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
5
Use of letrozole after aromatase inhibitor-based therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer (NRG Oncology/NSABP B-42): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.来曲唑在基于芳香化酶抑制剂的治疗后在绝经后乳腺癌中的应用(NRG 肿瘤学/NSABP B-42):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、3 期试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):88-99. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30621-1. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
6
Moving beyond the hazard ratio in quantifying the between-group difference in survival analysis.超越风险比:在生存分析中量化组间差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Aug 1;32(22):2380-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.2208. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
7
Restricted mean survival time: an alternative to the hazard ratio for the design and analysis of randomized trials with a time-to-event outcome.限制平均生存时间:替代风险比的方法,用于设计和分析具有时间事件结局的随机试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Dec 7;13:152. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-152.
8
Decomposition of number of life years lost according to causes of death.根据死亡原因对寿命损失年数进行分解。
Stat Med. 2013 Dec 30;32(30):5278-85. doi: 10.1002/sim.5903. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
9
Improper analysis of trials randomised using stratified blocks or minimisation.分层块或最小化随机试验的不当分析。
Stat Med. 2012 Feb 20;31(4):328-40. doi: 10.1002/sim.4431. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
10
The use of restricted mean survival time to estimate the treatment effect in randomized clinical trials when the proportional hazards assumption is in doubt.当存在比例风险假设的疑虑时,使用限制平均生存时间来估计随机临床试验中的治疗效果。
Stat Med. 2011 Aug 30;30(19):2409-21. doi: 10.1002/sim.4274. Epub 2011 May 25.