• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结直肠癌合并肝转移患者淋巴结检出数增加对预后的影响:美国数据库和中国注册登记研究的基于人群的回顾性研究。

Prognostic impact of increased lymph node yield in colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis: a population-based retrospective study of the US database and a Chinese registry.

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin.

Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):1932-1940. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000244.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000000244
PMID:37037584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10389346/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Quality Forum has endorsed at least 12 lymph node yield (LNY) as a surgical quality indicator in colorectal cancer (CRC), but the prognostic value of adequate lymphadenectomy has rarely been investigated for CRC patients with distant metastatic disease.

METHODS

A total of 4575 CRC patients with synchronous liver metastasis who underwent primary tumor resection were identified from a Chinese registry and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2010 and 2017. The Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox regression models were performed to assess the correlations between LNY and 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS). Propensity score matching were used to confirmed the survival comparison between patients with less than 12 and of at least 12 LNY.

RESULTS

The retrieval of at least 12 LNY was identified in most CRC patients (SEER database, 3380/3899, 86.7%; Chinese cohort, 565/676, 83.6%). In both the SEER database and the Chinese cohort, the patients with LNY ≥12 was significantly associated with better CSS compared with patients with LNY <12 before and after propensity score matching, with all P -value less than 0.05. After controlling for the confounders, multivariate analysis demonstrated that LNY was also an independent prognostic factor for patients with distant metastasis in both cohorts. In subgroup analysis, the CSS benefit for patients with LNY ≥12 was observed across most of the subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical feasibility of the 12-node threshold as a guideline quality metric of cancer care for CRC patients is necessary, and an oncologically adequate lymphadenectomy is still a critical component of high-quality surgical standard in CRC patients with distant metastases.

摘要

背景

国家质量论坛至少认可了 12 个淋巴结检出量(LNY)作为结直肠癌(CRC)的手术质量指标,但对于远处转移性 CRC 患者,充分淋巴结清扫的预后价值很少被研究。

方法

从中国登记处和监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中,确定了 2010 年至 2017 年期间 4575 例接受原发肿瘤切除术的同时性肝转移 CRC 患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 方法和 Cox 回归模型评估 LNY 与 3 年癌症特异性生存率(CSS)之间的相关性。采用倾向评分匹配法证实 LNY<12 与≥12 的患者之间的生存比较。

结果

在大多数 CRC 患者中,发现至少检出 12 个淋巴结(SEER 数据库 3380/3899,86.7%;中国队列 565/676,83.6%)。在 SEER 数据库和中国队列中,LNY≥12 的患者 CSS 均明显优于 LNY<12 的患者,在倾向评分匹配前后均具有统计学意义(所有 P 值均<0.05)。多变量分析显示,在两组中,LNY 也是远处转移患者的独立预后因素。亚组分析显示,在大多数亚组中,LNY≥12 的患者 CSS 获益。

结论

对于 CRC 患者,将 12 个淋巴结作为癌症治疗质量指标的临床可行性是必要的,对于远处转移的 CRC 患者,充分的淋巴结清扫仍然是高质量手术标准的关键组成部分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9819/10389346/4dc78b6e505c/js9-109-1932-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9819/10389346/94fa107a8023/js9-109-1932-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9819/10389346/ac0912b55465/js9-109-1932-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9819/10389346/6b7030a8d631/js9-109-1932-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9819/10389346/4dc78b6e505c/js9-109-1932-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9819/10389346/94fa107a8023/js9-109-1932-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9819/10389346/ac0912b55465/js9-109-1932-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9819/10389346/6b7030a8d631/js9-109-1932-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9819/10389346/4dc78b6e505c/js9-109-1932-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Prognostic impact of increased lymph node yield in colorectal cancer patients with synchronous liver metastasis: a population-based retrospective study of the US database and a Chinese registry.结直肠癌合并肝转移患者淋巴结检出数增加对预后的影响:美国数据库和中国注册登记研究的基于人群的回顾性研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Jul 1;109(7):1932-1940. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000244.
2
SEER-based evaluation of lymph node yield as a prognostic indicator of cancer-specific survival in nonmetastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.基于监测、流行病学与最终结果(SEER)数据库评估淋巴结获取数量作为非转移性胰腺导管腺癌癌症特异性生存预后指标的研究
Pancreatology. 2025 Jun;25(4):558-568. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2025.05.008. Epub 2025 May 16.
3
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
4
Lymph node ratio prognosticates overall survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.淋巴结比率可预测 IV 期结直肠癌患者的总生存。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Aug 23;28(1):115. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02984-6.
5
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
6
Finding the minimum number of retrieved lymph nodes in node-negative colorectal cancer using Real-world Data and the SEER database.利用真实世界数据和 SEER 数据库寻找结阴性结直肠癌中最少检出的淋巴结数量。
Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):4173-4184. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000746.
7
Lymph node ratio emerges as a pivotal prognostic determinant for cancer-specific survival amidst individuals diagnosed with stage N1 and N2 non-small cell lung carcinoma: A population-based retrospective cohort study.在被诊断为N1和N2期非小细胞肺癌的个体中,淋巴结比率成为癌症特异性生存的关键预后决定因素:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Apr 18;104(16):e42202. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042202.
8
Competing risk and random survival forest models for predicting survival in post-resection elderly stage I-III colorectal cancer patients.用于预测I-III期老年结直肠癌患者术后生存情况的竞争风险和随机生存森林模型
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 7;15(1):24269. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05824-1.
9
The prognostic impact of tumor deposits in colorectal cancer: More than just N1c.结直肠癌肿瘤沉积物的预后影响:不仅仅是 N1c。
Cancer. 2024 Dec 1;130(23):4052-4060. doi: 10.1002/cncr.35491. Epub 2024 Sep 22.
10
Long-term Outcome After Surgical Resection of Para-aortic Lymph Node Metastasis of Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.结直肠癌腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的外科切除长期预后:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Nov 1;67(11):1423-1436. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003347. Epub 2024 Jul 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Breaking Myths: Comparable Outcomes in Lymph Node Analysis Across Surgical Methods.打破神话:不同手术方法下淋巴结分析的可比结果
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 14;17(8):1312. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081312.
2
Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in unresected colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.预测接受化疗的未切除结直肠癌患者总生存期和癌症特异性生存期的列线图的开发与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 11;15(1):12477. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96526-1.
3
Lymph node yield does not affect the cancer-specific survival of patients with T1 colorectal cancer: a population-based retrospective study of the U.S. database and a Chinese registry.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical resection and survival outcomes in metastatic young adult colorectal cancer patients.转移性青年结直肠癌患者的手术切除和生存结局。
Cancer Med. 2021 Jul;10(13):4269-4281. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3940. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
2
Cancer Statistics, 2021.癌症统计数据,2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
3
Evaluating the impact of lymph node resampling on colorectal cancer nodal stage.评估淋巴结重新采样对结直肠癌淋巴结分期的影响。
淋巴结获取数量不影响T1期结直肠癌患者的癌症特异性生存率:一项基于美国数据库和中国登记处的人群回顾性研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2025 Feb 5;40(1):31. doi: 10.1007/s00384-025-04816-x.
4
Open Versus Laparoscopic Oncological Resections for Colon Cancer: An Experience at an Average-Volume Center.开放性与腹腔镜结肠癌肿瘤切除术:一家中等手术量中心的经验
Cureus. 2024 Sep 30;16(9):e70535. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70535. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
Number of lymph nodes retrieved in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after total neoadjuvant therapy: post-hoc analysis from the STELLAR trial.局部进展期直肠癌患者接受全新辅助治疗后淋巴结检出数目:来自 STELLAR 试验的事后分析。
BJS Open. 2024 Sep 3;8(5). doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae118.
6
Lymph node ratio prognosticates overall survival in patients with stage IV colorectal cancer.淋巴结比率可预测 IV 期结直肠癌患者的总生存。
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Aug 23;28(1):115. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02984-6.
Histopathology. 2020 Dec;77(6):974-983. doi: 10.1111/his.14209. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
Simultaneous Versus Delayed Resection for Initially Resectable Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Trial.同步与延迟切除对初始可切除结直肠癌肝转移的影响:一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机、对照临床试验。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):49-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003848.
5
Aggressive Multimodal Treatment and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Survival.积极的多模式治疗与转移性结直肠癌的生存。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Apr;230(4):689-698. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.12.024. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
How does lymph node yield affect survival outcomes of stage I and II colon cancer?淋巴结检出数目对Ⅰ期和Ⅱ期结肠癌患者的生存结局有何影响?
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan 29;18(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-1802-6.
7
Using Propensity Score Methods to Create Target Populations in Observational Clinical Research.在观察性临床研究中使用倾向评分方法创建目标人群。
JAMA. 2020 Feb 4;323(5):466-467. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.21558.
8
Increased lymph node yield indicates improved survival in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.新辅助放化疗治疗局部进展期直肠癌,增加淋巴结检出数可提高生存率。
Cancer Med. 2019 Aug;8(10):4615-4625. doi: 10.1002/cam4.2372. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
9
Comparison of the guidelines for colorectal cancer in Japan, the USA and Europe.日本、美国和欧洲结直肠癌诊疗指南的比较。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2017 Dec 19;2(1):6-12. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12047. eCollection 2018 Jan.
10
Practical Guide to Surgical Data Sets: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Database.手术数据集实用指南:监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库
JAMA Surg. 2018 Jun 1;153(6):588-589. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0501.