Comparing expandable and static interbody cages in lumbar interbody fusion.
作者信息
Elgafy Hossein, Behrens Kyle
机构信息
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toledo Medical Center, Toledo, OH, USA.
出版信息
J Spine Surg. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):1-5. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-5. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Comparing expandable and static interbody cages in lumbar interbody fusion.比较可扩张式与静态椎间融合器在腰椎椎间融合中的应用。
J Spine Surg. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):1-5. doi: 10.21037/jss-23-5. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
2
Expandable Versus Static Cages in Minimally Invasive Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.可扩张与静态 cage 在微创腰椎椎体间融合术中的应用：系统评价与荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jul;151:e607-e614. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.04.090. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
3
Biomechanical analysis of an expandable lateral cage and a static transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion cage with posterior instrumentation in an in vitro spondylolisthesis model.在体外腰椎滑脱模型中，对可扩张外侧椎间融合器和带后路内固定的静态经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合器进行生物力学分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2016 Jan;24(1):32-8. doi: 10.3171/2015.4.SPINE14636. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
4
Static versus Expandable Interbody Fusion Devices: A Comparison of 1-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.静态与可扩张椎间融合器：微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术1年临床和影像学结果比较
Asian Spine J. 2023 Feb;17(1):61-74. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0486. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
5
Expandable Cage Technology-Transforaminal, Anterior, and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.可扩张椎间融合器技术——经椎间孔、前路及外侧腰椎椎间融合术
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Jun 15;21(Suppl 1):S69-S80. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa342.
6
Expandable vs Static Cages in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Radiographic Comparison of Segmental and Lumbar Sagittal Angles.可扩张式与静态椎间融合器用于经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的比较：节段性及腰椎矢状面角度的影像学对比
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jul 1;81(1):69-74. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyw177.
7
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用可扩张 cage：术后晚期沉降风险增加，但围手术期结局无明显改善：一项临床单中心研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e57-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.127. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
8
Static Versus Expandable Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Interbody Cages: A Comparison of One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for One-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.静态与可扩张聚醚醚酮（PEEK）椎间融合器：单节段经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后一年临床和影像学结果比较。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e492-e501. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.128. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
9
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.使用可扩张与静态椎间融合器的微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术：矢状节段和骨盆参数的影像学评估
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E10. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17197.
10
Outcomes of Expandable Interbody Devices in Lumbar Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.可扩张椎间融合器在腰椎融合中的疗效：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Jul;33(6):230-243. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000959.
引用本文的文献
1
Expandable Cages for Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Narrative Review.用于腰椎椎间融合的可扩张椎间融合器：叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2024 May 14;13(10):2889. doi: 10.3390/jcm13102889.
2
Comparison of Outcomes between Single-Level and Double-Level Corpectomy in Thoracolumbar Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 16 Patients Using Expandable Cages.单节段与双节段椎体切除在胸腰椎重建中的疗效比较：16 例使用可扩张 cage 的回顾性研究
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Apr 20;30:e943797. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943797.
本文引用的文献
1
The effect of expandable versus static lordotic interbody implants in minimally invasive spine surgery: patient reported outcomes, sagittal alignment, and restoration of disc height and foraminal height.可扩张型与静态前凸椎间融合器在微创脊柱手术中的效果：患者报告结局、矢状面排列以及椎间盘高度和椎间孔高度的恢复情况
J Spine Surg. 2023 Mar 30;9(1):39-53. doi: 10.21037/jss-22-55. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
2
Does the application of expandable cages in TLIF provide improved clinical and radiological results compared to static cages? A meta-analysis.与静态椎间融合器相比，可扩张椎间融合器应用于经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术（TLIF）是否能改善临床和影像学结果？一项荟萃分析。
Front Surg. 2022 Aug 10;9:949938. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.949938. eCollection 2022.
3
Expandable versus Static Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cages: 1-year Radiographic Parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes.可扩张与静态经椎间孔腰椎体间融合器：1 年的影像学参数和患者报告的结果。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Mar;159:e1-e7. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.056. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
4
Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Expandable Cages: Increased Risk of Late Postoperative Subsidence Without a Real Improvement of Perioperative Outcomes: A Clinical Monocentric Study.经皮椎间孔腰椎体间融合术采用可扩张 cage：术后晚期沉降风险增加，但围手术期结局无明显改善：一项临床单中心研究。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Dec;156:e57-e63. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.127. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
Expandable Cage Technology-Transforaminal, Anterior, and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.可扩张椎间融合器技术——经椎间孔、前路及外侧腰椎椎间融合术
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021 Jun 15;21(Suppl 1):S69-S80. doi: 10.1093/ons/opaa342.
6
Static Versus Expandable Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) Interbody Cages: A Comparison of One-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for One-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.静态与可扩张聚醚醚酮（PEEK）椎间融合器：单节段经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术后一年临床和影像学结果比较。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Aug;152:e492-e501. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.128. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
7
Long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.可扩张式与固定式椎间融合器在经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术中的长期影像学结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Nov 13;34(3):471-480. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.SPINE191378. Print 2021 Mar 1.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study.经微创侧方腰椎椎间融合术比较可扩张与静态椎间融合器的有效性：一项为期2年的影像学和临床结果研究。
Global Spine J. 2020 Dec;10(8):998-1005. doi: 10.1177/2192568219886278. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
9
Tailoring selection of transforaminal interbody spacers based on biomechanical characteristics and surgical goals: evaluation of an expandable spacer.基于生物力学特性和手术目标定制经椎间孔椎间融合器的选择：一种可扩张融合器的评估
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Apr 12;32(3):383-389. doi: 10.3171/2019.1.SPINE181008. Print 2020 Mar 1.
10
Assessing the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Nonexpandable Cage Among Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.评估微创经椎间孔腰椎间融合术患者中可扩张 cage 与不可扩张 cage 在临床和影像学结果方面的差异：系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:596-606.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.03.284. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
Zotero 插件