• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠后长期症状患者呼吸肌训练计划后吸气肌功能变量的最小临床重要差异

Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Inspiratory Muscle Function Variables after a Respiratory Muscle Training Programme in Individuals with Long-Term Post-COVID-19 Symptoms.

作者信息

Del Corral Tamara, Fabero-Garrido Raúl, Plaza-Manzano Gustavo, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas César, Navarro-Santana Marcos José, López-de-Uralde-Villanueva Ibai

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM), 28040 Madrid, Spain.

Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), 28040 Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 5;12(7):2720. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072720.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12072720
PMID:37048804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10095020/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for inspiratory muscle strength (MIP) and endurance (IME) in individuals with long-term post-COVID-19 symptoms, as well as to ascertain which of the variables has a greater discriminatory capacity and to compare changes between individuals classified by the MCID.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of randomised controlled trial of data from 42 individuals who performed an 8-week intervention of respiratory muscle training programme.

RESULTS

A change of at least 18 cmHO and 22.1% of that predicted for MIP and 328.5s for IME represented the MCID. All variables showed acceptable discrimination between individuals who classified as "improved" and those classified as "stable/not improved" (area under the curve ≥0.73). MIP was the variable with the best discriminative ability when expressed as a percentage of prediction (Youden index, 0.67; sensitivity, 76.9%; specificity, 89.7%). Participants classified as "improved" had significantly greater improvements in quality of life and lung function compared with the participants classified as "stable/not improved".

CONCLUSION

In individuals with long-term post-COVID-19 symptoms, the inspiratory muscle function variables had an acceptable discriminative ability to assess the efficacy of a respiratory muscle training programme. MIP was the variable with the best discriminative ability, showing better overall performance when expressed as a percentage of prediction.

摘要

目的

确定新冠后长期症状患者吸气肌力量(MIP)和耐力(IME)的最小临床重要差异(MCID),确定哪个变量具有更大的辨别能力,并比较根据MCID分类的个体之间的变化。

设计

对42名进行了为期8周呼吸肌训练计划干预的个体的数据进行随机对照试验的二次分析。

结果

MIP至少变化18 cmH₂O,即预测值的22.1%,IME变化328.5秒代表MCID。所有变量在分类为“改善”和“稳定/未改善”的个体之间均显示出可接受的辨别力(曲线下面积≥0.73)。以预测值的百分比表示时,MIP是辨别能力最佳的变量(约登指数为0.67;敏感性为76.9%;特异性为89.7%)。与分类为“稳定/未改善”的参与者相比,分类为“改善”的参与者在生活质量和肺功能方面有显著更大的改善。

结论

在新冠后长期症状患者中,吸气肌功能变量对评估呼吸肌训练计划的疗效具有可接受的辨别能力。MIP是辨别能力最佳的变量,以预测值的百分比表示时总体表现更佳。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb05/10095020/ba87809f9201/jcm-12-02720-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb05/10095020/ba87809f9201/jcm-12-02720-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb05/10095020/ba87809f9201/jcm-12-02720-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimal Clinically Important Differences in Inspiratory Muscle Function Variables after a Respiratory Muscle Training Programme in Individuals with Long-Term Post-COVID-19 Symptoms.新冠后长期症状患者呼吸肌训练计划后吸气肌功能变量的最小临床重要差异
J Clin Med. 2023 Apr 5;12(7):2720. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072720.
2
Minimal Clinically Important Differences in EQ-5D-5L Index and VAS after a Respiratory Muscle Training Program in Individuals Experiencing Long-Term Post-COVID-19 Symptoms.经历长期新冠后症状的个体在进行呼吸肌训练计划后,EQ-5D-5L指数和视觉模拟量表的最小临床重要差异
Biomedicines. 2023 Sep 13;11(9):2522. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines11092522.
3
Inspiratory muscle training, with or without concomitant pulmonary rehabilitation, for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).吸气肌训练,联合或不联合肺康复治疗,用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 6;1(1):CD013778. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013778.pub2.
4
Home-based respiratory muscle training on quality of life and exercise tolerance in long-term post-COVID-19: Randomized controlled trial.基于家庭的呼吸肌训练对长期 COVID-19 后生活质量和运动耐量的影响:随机对照试验。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb;66(1):101709. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101709. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
5
Safety and efficacy of short- and long-term inspiratory muscle training in late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD): a pilot study.短时间和长时间吸气肌训练在迟发性庞贝病(LOPD)中的安全性和有效性:一项初步研究。
J Neurol. 2019 Jan;266(1):133-147. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-9112-4. Epub 2018 Nov 14.
6
Respiratory muscle training for multiple sclerosis.用于多发性硬化症的呼吸肌训练
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 21;12(12):CD009424. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009424.pub2.
7
Moderate- and High-Intensity Inspiratory Muscle Training Equally Improves Inspiratory Muscle Strength and Endurance-A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.中等强度和高强度吸气肌训练同等程度地改善吸气肌力量和耐力——一项双盲随机对照试验
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021 Aug 1;16(8):1111–1119. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2020-0189. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
8
Effects of 4-Week Inspiratory Muscle Training on Sport Performance in College 800-Meter Track Runners.为期4周的吸气肌训练对大学800米田径运动员运动表现的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jan 15;57(1):72. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010072.
9
A comparison of the effects of inspiratory muscle strength and endurance training on exercise capacity, respiratory muscle strength and endurance, and quality of life in pacemaker patients with heart failure: A randomized study.一项比较吸气肌力量和耐力训练对心力衰竭起搏器患者运动能力、呼吸肌力量和耐力以及生活质量影响的随机研究。
Heart Lung. 2022 Sep-Oct;55:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.04.006. Epub 2022 Apr 23.
10
Effects of inspiratory muscle training on walking capacity of individuals after stroke: A double-blind randomized trial.吸气肌训练对脑卒中后患者步行能力的影响:一项双盲随机试验。
Clin Rehabil. 2021 Sep;35(9):1247-1256. doi: 10.1177/0269215521999591. Epub 2021 Mar 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Inspiratory muscle training and aerobic exercise for respiratory muscle strength in myasthenia gravis post-hospitalization- a randomized controlled trial.住院后重症肌无力患者吸气肌训练和有氧运动对呼吸肌力量的影响——一项随机对照试验
BMC Pulm Med. 2025 May 27;25(1):266. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03733-7.
2
Extrapulmonary effects of lung volume reduction in severe emphysema: a systematic review.重度肺气肿肺减容术的肺外效应:一项系统评价
Eur Respir Rev. 2025 Apr 2;34(176). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0258-2024. Print 2025 Apr.
3
Exploring Medium- and Long-Term Respiratory and Functional Sequelae in Young Adults Post-COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
Home-based respiratory muscle training on quality of life and exercise tolerance in long-term post-COVID-19: Randomized controlled trial.基于家庭的呼吸肌训练对长期 COVID-19 后生活质量和运动耐量的影响:随机对照试验。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Feb;66(1):101709. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2022.101709. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
2
Respiratory muscle dysfunction in long-COVID patients.长新冠患者的呼吸肌功能障碍。
Infection. 2022 Oct;50(5):1391-1397. doi: 10.1007/s15010-022-01840-9. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
Minimal clinically important difference: The basics.
探索新冠康复后年轻成年人的中长期呼吸及功能后遗症
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jan 7;61(1):86. doi: 10.3390/medicina61010086.
4
Effect and individual response to inspiratory muscle training program among instrumentalist musicians.乐器演奏者中吸气肌训练计划的效果及个体反应。
Front Physiol. 2024 Dec 18;15:1522438. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1522438. eCollection 2024.
5
Effects of respiratory muscular training in post-covid-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.新冠后患者呼吸肌训练的效果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2024 Aug 27;16(1):181. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-00954-x.
6
Visualization Analysis of Research Trends and Hotspots in Inspiratory Muscle Training.吸气肌训练研究趋势与热点的可视化分析。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Sep 4;29:e941486. doi: 10.12659/MSM.941486.
7
The Onset of Musculoskeletal Pain in the COVID-19 Era: A Survey of Physiotherapy Students in Sicily.新冠疫情时代肌肉骨骼疼痛的发作:西西里岛物理治疗专业学生的一项调查
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023 Jun 28;8(3):91. doi: 10.3390/jfmk8030091.
最小临床重要差异:基础篇。
Medwave. 2021 Apr 7;21(3):e8149. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2021.03.8149.
4
Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome.新冠病毒感染后长期综合征。
Eur Respir Rev. 2022 Mar 9;31(163). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0185-2021. Print 2022 Mar 31.
5
Inspiratory muscle training enhances recovery post-COVID-19: a randomised controlled trial.吸气肌训练促进 COVID-19 后康复:一项随机对照试验。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Oct 6;60(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.03101-2021. Print 2022 Oct.
6
Prevalence of post-acute COVID-19 syndrome symptoms at different follow-up periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同随访期的新冠后综合征症状的流行率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022 May;28(5):657-666. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.01.014. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Persistent Exertional Intolerance After COVID-19: Insights From Invasive Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing.新冠病毒感染后持续运动不耐受:侵入性心肺运动试验的见解。
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):54-63. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.08.010. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
8
Estimation of minimal clinically important difference for quadriceps and inspiratory muscle strength in older outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study.老年慢性阻塞性肺疾病门诊患者股四头肌和吸气肌力量最小临床重要差异的评估:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Phys Ther Res. 2020 Oct 12;24(1):35-42. doi: 10.1298/ptr.E10049. eCollection 2021.
9
Use of sit-to-stand test to assess the physical capacity and exertional desaturation in patients post COVID-19.使用坐站测试评估新冠康复患者的身体能力和运动性低氧饱和度。
Chron Respir Dis. 2021 Jan-Dec;18:1479973121999205. doi: 10.1177/1479973121999205.
10
Minimum Clinically Important Difference in 30-s Sit-to-Stand Test After Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Subjects With COPD.COPD 患者肺康复后 30 秒坐立测试的最小临床重要差异。
Respir Care. 2019 Oct;64(10):1261-1269. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06694. Epub 2019 Jul 3.