• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者对不同加工动物蛋白喂养的鸡肉的偏好:意大利的最佳最差分析。

Consumers' Preferences for Chicken Fed on Different Processed Animal Proteins: A Best-Worst Analysis in Italy.

机构信息

Department of Political Sciences, University of Napoli Federico II, Via Rodinò 22, 80138 Napoli, Italy.

Department of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences (DIVAS), University of Milan, Via dell'Università, 6, 26900 Lodi, Italy.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2023 Apr 6;15(7):1800. doi: 10.3390/nu15071800.

DOI:10.3390/nu15071800
PMID:37049640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10097117/
Abstract

The increase in meat consumption expected in the next decade will require more and more proteins for animal feeding. The recent amendments to the European "BSE Regulation" allow the use of insects and porcine-based meals in poultry farming, providing novel, sustainable substitutes for vegetable fodder. While the technological and nutritional properties of novel feeds containing processed animal proteins are widely recognized, far less is known about consumers' acceptance of meat produced by animals fed on animal-based meals. In the present research, a best-worst survey was applied to estimate consumers' preferences for chicken fed on plants, insects, or porcine-based meals using a sample of 205 Italian consumers. Furthermore, product price, type of farming, and "Free-from" labeling were considered in the analysis to evaluate the relative importance of feed ingredients compared to other important attributes of meats. The results show that the most relevant attributes are type of farming and "Free-from" claims, while type of feed represents the third attribute in order of importance. Notably, both insect and porcine flour are considered as negative characteristics of the product, suggesting that mandatory labeling signaling the use of these feeds would negatively impact on the value of chicken meat.

摘要

未来十年,肉类消费预计将会增长,这将需要更多的动物饲料蛋白质。欧洲“疯牛病条例”的最新修正案允许在禽类养殖中使用昆虫和猪源性饲料,为蔬菜饲料提供了新颖、可持续的替代品。虽然含有加工动物蛋白的新型饲料的技术和营养特性已得到广泛认可,但对于消费者对以动物源性饲料喂养的动物生产的肉类的接受程度,人们知之甚少。在本研究中,我们采用最佳最差法调查,利用意大利 205 名消费者的样本,评估消费者对以植物、昆虫或猪源性饲料喂养的鸡肉的偏好。此外,在分析中还考虑了产品价格、养殖类型和“无添加”标签,以评估饲料成分相对于肉类其他重要属性的相对重要性。结果表明,最相关的属性是养殖类型和“无添加”声明,而饲料类型则是按重要性排列的第三属性。值得注意的是,昆虫和猪粉都被认为是产品的负面特征,这表明强制标签表明使用这些饲料将对鸡肉的价值产生负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/282a/10097117/881e3797a75c/nutrients-15-01800-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/282a/10097117/fd206fd24881/nutrients-15-01800-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/282a/10097117/572e6f43e67b/nutrients-15-01800-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/282a/10097117/881e3797a75c/nutrients-15-01800-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/282a/10097117/fd206fd24881/nutrients-15-01800-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/282a/10097117/572e6f43e67b/nutrients-15-01800-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/282a/10097117/881e3797a75c/nutrients-15-01800-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Consumers' Preferences for Chicken Fed on Different Processed Animal Proteins: A Best-Worst Analysis in Italy.消费者对不同加工动物蛋白喂养的鸡肉的偏好:意大利的最佳最差分析。
Nutrients. 2023 Apr 6;15(7):1800. doi: 10.3390/nu15071800.
2
Review: Recent advances in insect-based feeds: from animal farming to the acceptance of consumers and stakeholders.综述:昆虫基饲料的最新进展:从动物养殖到消费者和利益相关者的接受。
Animal. 2023 Jun;17 Suppl 2:100904. doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2023.100904. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
3
Insects as Feed for Farmed Poultry: Are Italian Consumers Ready to Embrace This Innovation?昆虫作为养殖家禽的饲料:意大利消费者准备好接受这项创新了吗?
Insects. 2021 May 12;12(5):435. doi: 10.3390/insects12050435.
4
Effect of organic poultry purchase frequency on consumer attitudes toward organic poultry meat.消费者购买有机家禽频率对其有机禽肉消费态度的影响。
J Food Sci. 2010 Sep;75(7):S384-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01775.x.
5
Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for value-added chicken product attributes.消费者对增值鸡肉产品属性的偏好和支付意愿。
J Food Sci. 2011 Oct;76(8):S469-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02354.x.
6
Impact of different chicken meat production systems on consumers' purchase perception.不同鸡肉生产体系对消费者购买感知的影响。
Br Poult Sci. 2021 Jun;62(3):387-395. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2020.1857335. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
7
Consumers' perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic attributes as indicators of safety and quality of chicken meat: Actionable information for public health authorities and the chicken industry.消费者对鸡肉内在和外在属性的认知与鸡肉的安全性和质量:公共卫生当局和鸡肉行业的可操作信息。
J Food Sci. 2020 Jun;85(6):1845-1855. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.15125. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
Decoy Effect on Consumers' Purchase Behaviors in Relation to Meat Products: Comparison of Pork and Chicken.诱饵效应对消费者肉类产品购买行为的影响:猪肉与鸡肉的比较
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 13;12:679256. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679256. eCollection 2021.
9
Sensory characterization of yellow pea and ground chicken hybrid meat burgers using static and dynamic methodologies.采用静态和动态方法对黄豌豆和鸡肉糜混合汉堡进行感官特性分析。
J Food Sci. 2022 Dec;87(12):5390-5401. doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16380. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
10
Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.意大利西北部消费者对牛肉的偏好:选择属性分析。
Meat Sci. 2018 Sep;143:119-128. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.04.023. Epub 2018 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent advances in essential oils and their nanoformulations for poultry feed.家禽饲料用精油及其纳米制剂的最新进展
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024 Aug 10;15(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s40104-024-01067-8.
2
Beyond Meat: Alternative Sources of Proteins to Feed the World.别样肉客:全球食物蛋白质的另类来源。
Nutrients. 2023 Jun 27;15(13):2899. doi: 10.3390/nu15132899.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing Australian consumer preferences for fresh pork meat attributes: A best-worst approach on 46 attributes.评估澳大利亚消费者对新鲜猪肉特性的偏好:对 46 个特性进行最佳-最差方法评估。
Meat Sci. 2022 Nov;193:108954. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108954. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
2
Insects as Feed for Farmed Poultry: Are Italian Consumers Ready to Embrace This Innovation?昆虫作为养殖家禽的饲料:意大利消费者准备好接受这项创新了吗?
Insects. 2021 May 12;12(5):435. doi: 10.3390/insects12050435.
3
Do consumers prefer pasture-raised dual-purpose cattle when considering meat products? A hypothetical discrete choice experiment for the case of minced beef.
消费者在考虑肉类产品时是否更喜欢草饲兼用肉牛?以碎牛肉为例的假设离散选择实验。
Meat Sci. 2021 Jul;177:108494. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2021.108494. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
4
Consumer acceptance among Dutch and German students of insects in feed and food.荷兰和德国学生对饲料和食品中昆虫的消费者接受度。
Food Sci Nutr. 2020 Dec 1;9(1):414-428. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2006. eCollection 2021 Jan.
5
Consumer Acceptance of Meat from Animals Reared on Insect Meal as Feed.消费者对以昆虫粉为饲料饲养的动物的肉类的接受度。
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jul 30;10(8):1312. doi: 10.3390/ani10081312.
6
The Role of Health Information in Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Canned Crushed Tomatoes Enriched with Lycopene.健康信息在消费者对富含番茄红素的罐装碎番茄支付意愿中的作用。
Nutrients. 2019 Sep 10;11(9):2173. doi: 10.3390/nu11092173.
7
The Potential Role of Insects as Feed: A Multi-Perspective Review.昆虫作为饲料的潜在作用:多视角综述
Animals (Basel). 2019 Mar 27;9(4):119. doi: 10.3390/ani9040119.
8
Consumer preferences for and beliefs about slow growth chicken.消费者对慢速生长鸡的偏好和看法。
Poult Sci. 2018 Dec 1;97(12):4159-4166. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey301.
9
Defining a land boundary for sustainable livestock consumption.定义可持续牲畜消费的土地边界。
Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Sep;24(9):4185-4194. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14321. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
10
Making sense of the "clean label" trends: A review of consumer food choice behavior and discussion of industry implications.解读“清洁标签”趋势:消费者食品选择行为综述及对行业的启示。
Food Res Int. 2017 Sep;99(Pt 1):58-71. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.022. Epub 2017 Jul 13.