Szendrő Katalin, Nagy Mónika Zita, Tóth Katalin
Institute of Marketing and Management, Kaposvár University, H-7400 Kaposvár, Hungary.
Institute of Methodology, Kaposvár University, H-7400 Kaposvár, Hungary.
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jul 30;10(8):1312. doi: 10.3390/ani10081312.
Insect protein production requires much less land, feed, and water, and thus has a much smaller ecological footprint than animal protein production, which is important for reducing global warming. Poultry, pigs, and fish consume insects in nature, so insect meal could be a good substitute for soybean and fishmeal as a protein source in diets. The aim of this study was to examine consumer opinion on meat that originated from animals whose diet contained insect meal. The study was conducted in Hungary in 2020 ( = 414). On a scale of 1-7, respondents gave much lower scores (3.96) to this product than that which originated from a free-range system (5.11; < 0.001). Male, more highly educated, and 30-39 year-old respondents gave significantly higher scores than other groups. The most important factor in accepting insect meal in animal feed was "no risk", while the least important factor was "replacement of Genetically Modified (GM) soybeans". Since free-range animals also consume insects, the difference in the attitude of respondents was based on their aversion to insects, while accepting free-range as the best animal welfare system. Thus, more emphasis should be placed on the benefits of insect meal in animal feed in order to bring about awareness and acceptance.
昆虫蛋白生产所需的土地、饲料和水要少得多,因此其生态足迹比动物蛋白生产小得多,这对减缓全球变暖很重要。家禽、猪和鱼在自然界中会捕食昆虫,所以昆虫粉可以作为日粮中大豆和鱼粉的优质蛋白质来源替代品。本研究的目的是调查消费者对源自食用含昆虫粉日粮动物的肉类的看法。该研究于2020年在匈牙利开展(样本量n = 414)。在1至7的评分量表上,受访者对该产品给出的分数(3.96)远低于源自自由放养系统的产品(5.11;P < 0.001)。男性、受教育程度较高以及年龄在30至39岁的受访者给出的分数显著高于其他群体。在动物饲料中接受昆虫粉的最重要因素是“无风险”,而最不重要的因素是“替代转基因大豆”。由于自由放养的动物也会捕食昆虫,受访者态度的差异基于他们对昆虫的厌恶,同时将自由放养视为最佳动物福利系统。因此,应更多地强调昆虫粉在动物饲料中的益处,以提高认识并促进接受。