Guo Ganlin, Hu Xuhua, Gao Tianyi, Zhou Huixian, Li Baokun, Zhou Chaoxi, Yu Bin, Wang Guiying
The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Front Surg. 2023 Mar 27;10:1139503. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1139503. eCollection 2023.
Numerous studies have confirmed that inflammation promotes the occurrence, development and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC).
This study focuses on the potentially prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in CRC patients.
This study was registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42020219215). Relative studies were searched on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and clinical trial databases by two back-to-back reviewers. : Studies were screened according to the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, comparing prognosis differences between low PLR levels and high PLR levels for CRC patients. : Studies were integrated and compared to analyze the value of PLR in predicting overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), disease-free survival (DFS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of CRC. : Outcomes were compared using Review Manager (version 5.4) software from Cochrane Collaboration. A total of 27 literary works, including 13,330 patients, were incorporated into our study. The final results showed that higher PLR levels had worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.40, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.21-1.62, < 0.00001), DFS (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.09-1.90, = 0.01) and RFS (HR = 1.48, 95% CI = 1.13-1.94, = 0.005) than lower PLR levels, respectively. However, there was no evidence of significance for PFS (HR = 1.14, 95% CI = 0.84-1.54, = 0.40) and CSS (HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.88-1.53, = 0.28) in the final meta-analysis.
Our study has the following limitations. First of all, we only included literature published in English, which means that some publication bias may be inevitable. In addition, our study used aggregate data, not individual data; furthermore, we did not define the exact cut-off value representing the PLR level.
An elevated PLR seems to be an adverse prognostic factor affecting survival outcomes in patients with CRC. Meanwhile, more prospective studies are required to confirm our conclusion.: CRD42020219215.
大量研究证实,炎症促进结直肠癌(CRC)的发生、发展及预后。
本研究聚焦血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)在CRC患者中的潜在预后价值。
本研究在国际前瞻性注册系统(ID:CRD42020219215)登记。由两名背对背的评审员在PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、Embase、科学网及临床试验数据库中检索相关研究。根据预先设定的纳入和排除标准筛选研究,比较CRC患者低PLR水平和高PLR水平之间的预后差异。整合并比较各项研究,分析PLR在预测CRC患者总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、癌症特异性生存期(CSS)、无病生存期(DFS)和无复发生存期(RFS)方面的价值。使用Cochrane协作网的Review Manager(5.4版)软件比较结果。共有27篇文献纳入我们的研究,包括13330例患者。最终结果显示,较高的PLR水平与较低的PLR水平相比,OS(风险比[HR]=1.40,95%置信区间[CI]=1.21 - 1.62,P<0.00001)、DFS(HR = 1.44,95% CI = (此处原文有误,应为1.09 - 1.90),P = 0.01)和RFS(HR = 1.48,95% CI = 1.13 - 1.94,P = 0.005)更差。然而,在最终的荟萃分析中,PFS(HR = 1.14,95% CI = 0.84 - 1.54,P = 0.40)和CSS(HR = 1.16,95% CI = 0.88 - 1.53,P = 0.28)无显著意义。
本研究存在以下局限性。首先,我们仅纳入了英文发表的文献,这意味着一些发表偏倚可能不可避免。此外,本研究使用的是汇总数据,而非个体数据;而且,我们未定义代表PLR水平的确切临界值。
PLR升高似乎是影响CRC患者生存结局的不良预后因素。同时,需要更多前瞻性研究来证实我们的结论。:CRD42020219215 。 (注:原文中“95% CI = (此处原文有误,应为1.09 - 1.90)”为译者根据上下文补充说明,原文此处确实存在格式错误。)