• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食管黏膜导纳:一种诊断胃食管反流病的新技术——它可行吗?

Esophageal Mucosal Admittance: A New Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Is It Feasible?

作者信息

Dao Hang Viet, Hoang Long Bao, Nguyen Binh Phuc, Nguyen Hoa Lan, Goldberg Robert, Allison Jeroan, Dao Thi Minh An, Matsumura Tomoaki, Dao Long Van

机构信息

Internal Medicine Faculty, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Endoscopy Center, Hanoi Medical University Hospital, Hanoi, Vietnam.

出版信息

Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 7;16:45-54. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S399764. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.2147/CEG.S399764
PMID:37056486
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10089276/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Esophageal mucosal admittance (MA) is a promising diagnostic method for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We conducted a study to describe the esophageal MA in patients with reflux symptoms and determine its diagnostic accuracy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We recruited 92 patients with ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and MA measured by the tissue conductance meter. MA was measured during endoscopy at 5cm (distal esophagus) and 15cm above the Z line (middle esophagus), repeated at least five times at each position, and median MA was obtained. Afterwards, two biopsies were taken 5cm above the Z line for histopathological evaluation using the Esohisto criteria. Patients were classified as GERD or non-GERD according to the 2018 Lyon consensus.

RESULTS

The mean age was 43.2 years, and 42 patients were males. The most common symptoms were regurgitation (75.0%), belching (65.2%), and heartburn (46.7%). Twenty-three (32.3%) were diagnosed with GERD using the Lyon consensus, and 24 (26.1%) had esophagitis on histopathology. The median MA at the distal and middle esophagus was moderately correlated. The median MA at both positions was higher in the GERD group but only statistically significant in the middle esophagus. MA was not associated with pH-impedance parameters and esophagitis on histopathology. The diagnostic model developed using the logistic regression did not have good accuracy.

CONCLUSION

MA was not different between GERD and non-GERD patients.

摘要

目的

食管黏膜导纳(MA)是一种很有前景的胃食管反流病(GERD)诊断方法。我们开展了一项研究,以描述有反流症状患者的食管MA,并确定其诊断准确性。

患者与方法

我们招募了92例患者,对其进行动态pH阻抗监测、上消化道内镜检查,并使用组织电导仪测量MA。在内镜检查期间,于距Z线5cm(食管远端)和Z线上方15cm(食管中段)处测量MA,每个位置至少重复测量5次,得出MA中位数。之后,在Z线上方5cm处取两块活检组织,按照食管组织学标准进行组织病理学评估。根据2018年里昂共识,将患者分为GERD组或非GERD组。

结果

患者平均年龄为43.2岁,男性42例。最常见的症状为反流(75.0%)、嗳气(65.2%)和烧心(46.7%)。根据里昂共识,23例(32.3%)被诊断为GERD,24例(26.1%)组织病理学检查有食管炎。食管远端和中段的MA中位数呈中度相关。GERD组两个位置的MA中位数均较高,但仅在食管中段有统计学意义。MA与pH阻抗参数及组织病理学食管炎无关。使用逻辑回归建立的诊断模型准确性不佳。

结论

GERD患者与非GERD患者的MA无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/eb82a86fe408/CEG-16-45-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/04b57b0c2865/CEG-16-45-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/b23f69281f18/CEG-16-45-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/ce52c9675948/CEG-16-45-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/6b965248bde7/CEG-16-45-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/b9fd77f0a172/CEG-16-45-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/eb82a86fe408/CEG-16-45-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/04b57b0c2865/CEG-16-45-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/b23f69281f18/CEG-16-45-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/ce52c9675948/CEG-16-45-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/6b965248bde7/CEG-16-45-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/b9fd77f0a172/CEG-16-45-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd55/10089276/eb82a86fe408/CEG-16-45-g0006.jpg

相似文献

1
Esophageal Mucosal Admittance: A New Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease - Is It Feasible?食管黏膜导纳:一种诊断胃食管反流病的新技术——它可行吗?
Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 7;16:45-54. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S399764. eCollection 2023.
2
Endoscopic-Guided Measurement of Mucosal Admittance can Discriminate Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease from Functional Heartburn.内镜引导下黏膜导纳测量可区分胃食管反流病与功能性烧心。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun 1;8(6):e94. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.22.
3
Evaluation of Esophageal Mucosal Integrity in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病患者食管黏膜完整性的评估。
Digestion. 2018;97(1):31-37. doi: 10.1159/000484106. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
4
Development and Validation of a Mucosal Impedance Contour Analysis System to Distinguish Esophageal Disorders.开发并验证一种黏膜阻抗轮廓分析系统以区分食管疾病。
Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1617-1626.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.253. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
5
Gastroesophageal reflux disease in pediatric esophageal atresia: Assessment of clinical symptoms and pH-impedance data.小儿食管闭锁中的胃食管反流病:临床症状及pH阻抗数据评估
World J Clin Pediatr. 2020 Sep 19;9(2):29-43. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v9.i2.29.
6
Multimodality evaluation of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms who have failed empiric proton pump inhibitor therapy.胃食管反流病症状患者经经验性质子泵抑制剂治疗失败后的多模态评估。
Dis Esophagus. 2013 Jul;26(5):443-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01381.x. Epub 2012 Aug 2.
7
How many cases of laryngopharyngeal reflux suspected by laryngoscopy are gastroesophageal reflux disease-related?经喉镜检查怀疑的咽反流病例中有多少与胃食管反流病有关?
World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Aug 28;18(32):4363-70. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i32.4363.
8
Diagnostic value of dilated intercellular space and histopathologic scores in gastroesophageal reflux disease.细胞间隙增宽及组织病理学评分在胃食管反流病中的诊断价值
Dis Esophagus. 2015 Aug-Sep;28(6):530-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12256. Epub 2014 Aug 18.
9
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Diagnosis by New Consensus in Clinical Practice: The Additional Value of Mean Basal Impedance.胃食管反流病临床实践新共识诊断:平均基础阻抗的附加价值。
Dig Dis. 2022;40(3):261-265. doi: 10.1159/000517987. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
10
Belching: dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux disease?嗳气:消化不良还是胃食管反流病?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct;98(10):2139-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07627.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel Technique to Diagnose Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.诊断胃食管反流病的新技术
Korean J Helicobacter Up Gastrointest Res. 2024 Sep;24(3):208-217. doi: 10.7704/kjhugr.2024.0020. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
Established and Novel Methods to Assess GERD: An Update.评估胃食管反流病的既定方法与新方法:最新进展
Visc Med. 2024 Dec;40(6):331-338. doi: 10.1159/000540186. Epub 2024 Oct 15.

本文引用的文献

1
ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.美国胃肠病学会胃食管反流病诊断和管理临床指南
Am J Gastroenterol. 2022 Jan 1;117(1):27-56. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538.
2
Mucosal pathogenesis in gastro-esophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病的黏膜发病机制。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Dec;32(12):e14022. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14022. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
3
Measurement of Esophageal Nocturnal Baseline Impedance: A Simplified Method.食管夜间基线阻抗的测量:一种简化方法。
J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020 Apr 30;26(2):241-247. doi: 10.5056/jnm19183.
4
: An open source Python package for producing summary statistics for research papers.一个用于生成研究论文摘要统计信息的开源Python包。
JAMIA Open. 2018 May 23;1(1):26-31. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy012. eCollection 2018 Jul.
5
ASGE guideline on screening and surveillance of Barrett's esophagus.美国胃肠内镜学会巴雷特食管筛查与监测指南。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Sep;90(3):335-359.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.05.012.
6
Modern diagnosis of GERD: the Lyon Consensus.现代 GERD 诊断:里昂共识。
Gut. 2018 Jul;67(7):1351-1362. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314722. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
7
Evaluation of Esophageal Mucosal Integrity in Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.胃食管反流病患者食管黏膜完整性的评估。
Digestion. 2018;97(1):31-37. doi: 10.1159/000484106. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
8
Endoscopic-Guided Measurement of Mucosal Admittance can Discriminate Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease from Functional Heartburn.内镜引导下黏膜导纳测量可区分胃食管反流病与功能性烧心。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun 1;8(6):e94. doi: 10.1038/ctg.2017.22.
9
Ambulatory reflux monitoring for diagnosis of gastro-esophageal reflux disease: Update of the Porto consensus and recommendations from an international consensus group.门诊反流监测在胃食管反流病诊断中的应用:波尔图共识更新及国际共识专家组建议。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017 Oct;29(10):1-15. doi: 10.1111/nmo.13067. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
10
Global prevalence of, and risk factors for, gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms: a meta-analysis.全球胃食管反流症状的患病率及危险因素:一项荟萃分析。
Gut. 2018 Mar;67(3):430-440. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313589. Epub 2017 Feb 23.