Suppr超能文献

通过评估农场工作人员的流动情况来优化猪场的内部生物安全措施。

Optimizing internal biosecurity on pig farms by assessing movements of farm staff.

作者信息

Bernaerdt Elise, Díaz Inmaculada, Piñeiro Carlos, Collell Miquel, Dewulf Jeroen, Maes Dominiek

机构信息

Unit of Porcine Health Management, Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction, and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium.

PigCHAMP Pro Europa, C. Dámaso Alonso 14, 40006, Segovia, Spain.

出版信息

Porcine Health Manag. 2023 Apr 15;9(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40813-023-00310-4.

Abstract

For internal biosecurity, it is important to separate different age groups in a pig farm and to stick to specific working lines when visiting the barns. Currently, there is no research on the movements of farm staff on pig farms. The objectives of this observational study were to assess movements of farm staff on pig farms, to assess risky movements and to investigate whether movements differ according to time (week of the batch farrowing system (BFS) and weekday vs. weekend) and unit (farrowing, gestation/insemination, nursery, and fattening unit). Five commercial sow farms participated and on each farm, an internal movement monitoring system was installed. Detection points were installed throughout the farm and workers had to wear a personal beacon. Movement data were collected from 1 December 2019 until 30 November 2020. The following sequence of movements was considered as safe: (1) dressing room, (2) farrowing, (3) gestation/insemination, (4) nursery, (5) fattening, (6) quarantine, and (7) cadaver storage. Movements in the opposite direction were considered as risk, unless a dressing room was visited in between. The total number of movements differed according to week of the BFS, and was highest in insemination and farrowing week. The percentage of risky movements was influenced by week of the BFS for two farms, and was highest around weaning. The percentage of risky movements varied between farms and ranged from 9 to 38%. There were more movements on a weekday compared to a weekend day. There were more movements towards the farrowing and gestation/insemination unit in insemination and farrowing week compared to other weeks of the BFS, but week of the BFS had no impact on movements towards nursery and fattening unit. This study showed that there were a lot of (risky) movements on pig farms and that these movements varied according to week of the BFS, day of the week, and unit. This study creates awareness, which could be a first step in optimizing working lines. Future research should focus on why certain risky movements occur and how these can be avoided to achieve better biosecurity and higher health status on farms.

摘要

对于猪场的内部生物安全而言,在猪场中区分不同年龄组并在进入猪舍时遵循特定的工作线路非常重要。目前,尚无关于猪场工作人员行动轨迹的研究。这项观察性研究的目的是评估猪场工作人员的行动轨迹,评估危险行动,并调查行动轨迹是否因时间(批次分娩系统(BFS)的周数以及工作日与周末)和单元(分娩、妊娠/配种、保育和育肥单元)而有所不同。五个商业母猪场参与了研究,每个猪场都安装了内部行动监测系统。监测点遍布整个猪场,工作人员必须佩戴个人信标。行动数据从2019年12月1日收集至2020年11月30日。以下行动顺序被视为安全:(1)更衣室,(2)分娩,(3)妊娠/配种,(4)保育,(5)育肥,(6)隔离,以及(7)尸体储存。除非中间经过更衣室,否则相反方向的行动被视为危险行动。行动总数因BFS的周数而异,在配种和分娩周最高。两个猪场的危险行动百分比受BFS周数的影响,在断奶前后最高。危险行动的百分比在不同猪场之间有所不同,范围从9%到38%。与周末相比,工作日的行动更多。与BFS的其他周相比,在配种和分娩周,前往分娩和妊娠/配种单元的行动更多,但BFS的周数对前往保育和育肥单元的行动没有影响。这项研究表明,猪场存在大量(危险)行动,并且这些行动因BFS的周数、星期几和单元而异。这项研究提高了人们的认识,这可能是优化工作线路的第一步。未来的研究应关注某些危险行动发生的原因以及如何避免这些行动,以实现更好的生物安全和农场更高的健康水平。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48c4/10105464/2c4ce3f784bf/40813_2023_310_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验