• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

汽油蒸气暴露。第一部分。工作场所暴露的特征描述。

Gasoline vapor exposures. Part I. Characterization of workplace exposures.

作者信息

Halder C A, Van Gorp G S, Hatoum N S, Warne T M

出版信息

Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Mar;47(3):164-72.

PMID:3706142
Abstract

Monitoring surveys of gasoline vapor exposures were conducted on truck drivers and terminal operators from five terminal loading facilities, on dockmen and seamen at two tanker/barge loading facilities, and on attendants at a single expressway service plaza. Results revealed wide variations in total C6+ hydrocarbon exposures for each location, with overall 8-hr time-weighted averaged (TWA) geometric means of 5.7 mg/m3 (1.4 ppm) for the terminals, and 4.0 mg/m3 (1.0 ppm) for the service plaza, respectively. The exposures ranged from 0.8 to 120.8 mg/m3 (0.2-30.1 ppm) for the terminals, and from 1.1 to 130.3 mg/m3 (0.3-32.5 ppm) for the service plaza. For the terminals, exposures were not significantly different regardless of loading method or the presence or absence of vapor recovery systems. Comprehensive chemical analyses of terminal employee exposure samples revealed that the C4 and C5 hydrocarbon components constituted 74.8 +/- 9.2% of the total exposure sample on a microgram/sample basis. The C6, C7, and C8+ components constituted 13.0 +/- 1.9, 6.2 +/- 3.0, and 5.9 +/- 7.2% of the total samples, respectively. Comprehensive analyses of the marine employee exposure samples resulted in a similar distribution of components; that is, 66.6 +/- 7.9, 17.5 +/- 4.7, 9.2 +/- 3.1, and 6.4 +/- 1.9% for the C4/C5, C6, C7, and C8+ components, respectively. The composition of the exposures, however, was weighted more toward the C5, C6 and C7 components when compared to the bulk terminal employee exposures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对来自五个码头装卸设施的卡车司机和码头操作员、两个油轮/驳船装卸设施的码头工人和海员以及一个高速公路服务广场的工作人员进行了汽油蒸气暴露监测调查。结果显示,每个地点的总C6+碳氢化合物暴露情况差异很大,码头的8小时时间加权平均(TWA)几何平均值总体为5.7毫克/立方米(1.4 ppm),服务广场为4.0毫克/立方米(1.0 ppm)。码头的暴露范围为0.8至120.8毫克/立方米(0.2 - 30.1 ppm),服务广场为1.1至130.3毫克/立方米(0.3 - 32.5 ppm)。对于码头,无论装载方法如何或是否存在蒸气回收系统,暴露情况均无显著差异。对码头员工暴露样本的综合化学分析表明,以微克/样本计,C4和C5碳氢化合物成分占总暴露样本的74.8 +/- 9.2%。C6、C7和C8+成分分别占总样本的13.0 +/- 1.9%、6.2 +/- 3.0%和5.9 +/- 7.2%。对海员暴露样本的综合分析得出了类似的成分分布;即C4/C5、C6、C7和C8+成分分别为66.6 +/- 7.9%、17.5 +/- 4.7%、9.2 +/- 3.1%和6.4 +/- 1.9%。然而,与码头员工总体暴露相比,这些暴露的成分在C5、C6和C7成分上的权重更大。(摘要截短于250字)

相似文献

1
Gasoline vapor exposures. Part I. Characterization of workplace exposures.汽油蒸气暴露。第一部分。工作场所暴露的特征描述。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Mar;47(3):164-72.
2
A simultaneous job- and task-based exposure evaluation of petroleum tanker drivers to benzene and total hydrocarbons.对石油 tanker 司机接触苯和总烃进行基于工作和任务的同步暴露评估。 (注:“tanker”常见释义为“油轮、油罐车”等,这里结合语境翻译为“油罐车”更合适,但不确定原文是否有误,正常表述应为“petroleum tanker truck drivers”即“油罐车司机” )
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2004 Nov;1(11):725-37. doi: 10.1080/15459620490520756.
3
Gasoline vapor exposures at a high volume service station.大型服务站的汽油蒸汽暴露情况。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Sep;47(9):535-9. doi: 10.1080/15298668691390188.
4
Benzene exposures during gasoline loading at bulk marketing terminals.
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1979 Jun;40(6):468-73. doi: 10.1080/15298667991429840.
5
Hydrocarbon exposures at petroleum bulk terminals and agencies.石油储存码头和机构中的碳氢化合物暴露。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1992 Oct;53(10):645-56. doi: 10.1080/15298669291360292.
6
Service station attendants' exposure to benzene and gasoline vapors.加油站工作人员对苯和汽油蒸气的接触。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1979 Apr;40(4):315-21. doi: 10.1080/15298667991429642.
7
Gasoline vapor exposures. Part II. Evaluation of the nephrotoxicity of the major C4/C5 hydrocarbon components.汽油蒸气暴露。第二部分。主要C4/C5烃类成分的肾毒性评估。
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1986 Mar;47(3):173-5. doi: 10.1080/15298668691389531.
8
Evolution of occupational exposure to environmental levels of aromatic hydrocarbons in service stations.服务站中职业性接触环境水平芳烃的演变。
Ann Occup Hyg. 2005 Apr;49(3):233-40. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meh083. Epub 2005 Jan 13.
9
Assessment of occupational exposure to VOCs at the Gantry gasoline Terminal.龙门汽油码头挥发性有机化合物职业暴露评估
J Environ Sci Eng. 2006 Jul;48(3):175-82.
10
[Exposure to benzene of service station employees and composition of benzene].[加油站员工的苯暴露与苯的成分]
Med Lav. 1994 Sep-Oct;85(5):412-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic carcinogenicity study of gasoline vapor condensate (GVC) and GVC containing methyl tertiary-butyl ether in F344 rats.慢性致癌性研究汽油蒸气冷凝物(GVC)和含有甲基叔丁基醚的 GVC 在 F344 大鼠。
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2011;74(10):638-57. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2011.538837.
2
Environmental and biological monitoring of benzene during self-service automobile refueling.自助式汽车加油过程中苯的环境与生物监测
Environ Health Perspect. 2000 Dec;108(12):1195-202. doi: 10.1289/ehp.001081195.
3
Kidney cancer and hydrocarbon exposures among petroleum refinery workers.
炼油厂工人中的肾癌与碳氢化合物暴露
Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Dec;101 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):53-62. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s653.
4
Exposure to vapors of benzene and other aromatic solvents in tank truck loading and delivery.在油罐车装卸和运输过程中接触苯及其他芳香族溶剂的蒸汽。
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1991 Jan;46(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01688247.