In Vivo Efficacy of an Injectable Human Acellular Dermal Matrix.

BACKGROUND

Human acellular dermal matrix (hADM) has found applications in a variety of settings, particularly in breast surgery. The most common hADM is a sheet. Recently, an injectable hADM has been introduced; we compared the biocompatibility and long-term structural integrity of, an injectable hADM and a sheet-type hADM in mice.

METHODS

An injectable hADM (experimental group) and a sheet-type hADM (control group) were implanted into sub-panniculus pockets on the backs of 50 mice. The animals were sacrificed 2, 4, 8, 12, or 24 weeks later and the hADMs and surrounding tissues were recovered and stained for histopathological analyses. The microscopic endpoints included the thickness of the hADM and capsule around the hADM, and the extents of fibroblast proliferation and neovascularization.

RESULTS

No animal developed a complication or infection. The capsule was significantly thinner in the experimental than the control group. There were no significant differences between groups in the hADM thickness. Microscopically, the fibroblast density inside the hADM was significantly higher in the experimental group. The fibroblasts inside of the hADM lay significantly deeper in the experimental group. Similarly, the experimental group exhibited significantly deeper microvessels inside the hADM.

CONCLUSIONS

The injectable hADM had a thinner capsule thickness (more biocompatible), than the sheet-type hADM. It maintained its thickness as well as the sheet-type hADM and had a more fibroblast proliferation and neovascularization. This means the tissue incorporation and long-term structural integrity of the injectable hADM may be as good as or better than that of the sheet-type hADM.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .