Parker G, Brown L, Blignault I
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1986 Jun;43(6):561-5. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800060055007.
We assessed a large sample of nonmelancholic, depressed subjects, using a self-report measure we developed, to determine behavioral coping dimensions and the predictive validity of the measure. A principal-components analysis of measure scores suggested dimensions of distraction, support seeking, self-consolation, recklessness, affect reduction, and help seeking, largely replicating findings in nonclinical groups. Factor scores on each dimension were calculated for the subsample of depressive subjects consulting a psychiatrist. Those baseline scores were examined against subsequent improvement in depression levels at six and 20 weeks. A significant and consistent predictor of a poor outcome was a higher initial score on the self-consolation dimension. A better outcome was weakly associated at six and 20 weeks with higher scores on affect reduction, whereas higher distraction scores were weakly associated with a poorer outcome at 20 weeks. The study thus confirmed the relevance of coping behaviors in a clinically depressed group and demonstrated the predictive strength of the measure.
我们使用自行开发的一份自我报告量表,对大量非抑郁性抑郁症患者样本进行评估,以确定行为应对维度以及该量表的预测效度。对量表得分进行的主成分分析表明,存在分心、寻求支持、自我安慰、鲁莽、情绪缓解和寻求帮助等维度,这在很大程度上重复了非临床群体的研究结果。为咨询精神科医生的抑郁症患者子样本计算了每个维度的因子得分。将这些基线得分与六周和二十周后抑郁水平的改善情况进行对比研究。自我安慰维度初始得分较高是预后不良的一个显著且一致的预测指标。在六周和二十周时,情绪缓解得分较高与较好的预后呈弱相关,而在二十周时,分心得分较高与较差的预后呈弱相关。该研究因此证实了应对行为在临床抑郁症群体中的相关性,并证明了该量表的预测力。