Li Juan, Chen Yi-Ping, Zhang Jie, Lv Meng-Meng, Välimäki Maritta, Li Yi-Fei, Yang Si-Lan, Tao Ying-Xiang, Ye Bi-Yun, Tan Chu-Xia, Zhang Jing-Ping
Xiangya Nursing School of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 20;11:560556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.560556. eCollection 2020.
This study aims to explore the association between life events and coping styles, and how resilience and self-esteem mediate the association. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 981 left-behind adolescents (LBAs) in five junior high schools in Hunan Province, China, from April 13 to April 20, 2020. We utilized self-designed sociodemographic questionnaire, Adolescent Self-Rating Life Events Checklist, Resilience Scale Chinese Adolescent, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, and Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire to assess the mental health of LBAs. Statistic description, Pearson correlation analysis, and structural equation model were adopted to analyze the data. Results revealed that life events could negatively predict resilience (β = -0.29, < 0.001) and self-esteem (β = -0.39, < 0.001) and positively predict LBAs' positive coping style (β = 0.28, < 0.001) and negative coping style (β = 0.21, < 0.001). Self-esteem could also positively predict the resilience of LBAs (β = 0.62, < 0.001); resilience could negatively predict the negative coping style (β = -0.21, < 0.001) and positively predict the positive coping style (β = 0.79, < 0.001). Life events not only have direct effects on negative coping style (β = 0.21) and positive coping style (β = 0.28) but also have indirect effects on coping styles by affecting resilience (β = -0.29) and self-esteem (β = -0.39). The total effect of life events on coping styles was 0.32, where 34.37% was mediated by resilience and self-esteem. We proved that resilience and self-esteem mediated most of the effects of life events on coping styles. The findings had important implications for interventions to promote mental health of LBAs, particularly the enhancement of resilience and self-esteem.
本研究旨在探讨生活事件与应对方式之间的关联,以及心理韧性和自尊如何在这种关联中起中介作用。2020年4月13日至4月20日,在中国湖南省五所初中对981名留守儿童进行了一项横断面研究。我们使用自行设计的社会人口学问卷、青少年自评生活事件量表、青少年心理韧性量表、罗森伯格自尊量表和简易应对方式问卷来评估留守儿童的心理健康状况。采用统计描述、Pearson相关分析和结构方程模型对数据进行分析。结果显示,生活事件能够负向预测心理韧性(β = -0.29,< 0.001)和自尊(β = -0.39,< 0.001),正向预测留守儿童的积极应对方式(β = 0.28,< 0.001)和消极应对方式(β = 0.21,< 0.001)。自尊也能够正向预测留守儿童的心理韧性(β = 0.62,< 0.001);心理韧性能够负向预测消极应对方式(β = -0.21,< 0.001),正向预测积极应对方式(β = 0.79,< 0.001)。生活事件不仅对消极应对方式(β = 0.21)和积极应对方式(β = 0.28)有直接影响,还通过影响心理韧性(β = -0.29)和自尊(β = -0.39)对应对方式产生间接影响。生活事件对应对方式的总效应为0.32,其中34.37%由心理韧性和自尊介导。我们证明了心理韧性和自尊介导了生活事件对应对方式的大部分影响。这些发现对于促进留守儿童心理健康的干预措施具有重要意义,特别是增强心理韧性和自尊。