Suppr超能文献

矫治器边缘与牙周健康:年轻患者的临床视角研究。

Edge level of aligners and periodontal health: a clinical perspective study in young patients.

机构信息

Università degli Studi di Padova, Dipartimento di Neuroscienze (Padova/Veneto, Italy).

出版信息

Dental Press J Orthod. 2023 Apr 14;28(1):e2321124. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.1.e2321124.oar. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although the superiority of clear aligners over multi-bracket appliances in keeping gingiva healthy has been suggested, the possible benefits of one aligner design over another have not yet been investigated, especially with regard to the vestibular edge.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to measure several periodontal indexes in adolescents undergoing orthodontic treatment with aligners, comparing two different types of rim.

METHODS

The study involved 43 patients aged between 14 and 18 years. The periodontal health was assessed using plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI), and gingival bleeding index (GBI), at the start of the treatment with aligners (T0), with a vestibular rim (VR) reaching up to 3 mm beyond the gingival margin. Three months later (T1), aligners were set to obtain a juxtagingival rim (JR) on the second quadrant and VR on the first quadrant. The periodontal indexes were measured again, both at T1 and then three months later (T2).

RESULTS

Intra-quadrant comparisons revealed a statistically significant worsening of the periodontal indexes only for the second quadrant (p<0.05), at T1 (GI), and especially at T2 (PI, GI, GBI), while no statistically significant changes were found for the first quadrant.

CONCLUSIONS

More severe mechanical irritation, especially during insertion and removal of the aligner, can explain the worsening inflammatory indexes with the JR. In addition, the pressure exerted by the JR on the gingival sulcus seemed to facilitate plaque deposition, whereas the VR had a protective effect, reducing the risk of mechanical trauma.

摘要

引言

虽然已经有人提出,隐形矫治器在保持牙龈健康方面优于多托槽矫治器,但尚未研究一种矫治器设计相对于另一种设计的可能优势,尤其是关于前庭边缘。

目的

本研究旨在通过比较两种不同边缘设计的隐形矫治器,测量接受正畸治疗的青少年的几项牙周指数。

方法

该研究共纳入 43 名 14 至 18 岁的患者。使用菌斑指数(PI)、牙龈指数(GI)和牙龈出血指数(GBI)在开始佩戴隐形矫治器(T0)时评估牙周健康状况,隐形矫治器的边缘超出牙龈边缘 3 毫米。3 个月后(T1),在第二象限设置隐形矫治器以获得邻龈边缘(JR),在第一象限设置前庭边缘(VR)。再次测量 T1 和 3 个月后的 T2 时的牙周指数。

结果

象限内比较显示,仅第二象限的牙周指数在 T1 时(GI),尤其是在 T2 时(PI、GI、GBI)有统计学意义的恶化,而第一象限无统计学意义的变化。

结论

JR 更严重的机械刺激,尤其是在佩戴和取下隐形矫治器时,可能解释了 JR 时炎症指数的恶化。此外,JR 对牙龈沟施加的压力似乎有利于菌斑沉积,而 VR 具有保护作用,降低了机械创伤的风险。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/afc7/10108582/83e3f15b1c38/2177-6709-dpjo-28-01-e2321124-gf1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验