Tenney Kristin, Stringer Brinley Poulsen, LaTona-Tequida Talia, White Isabel
University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
J Microbiol Biol Educ. 2023 Feb 28;24(1). doi: 10.1128/jmbe.00168-22. eCollection 2023 Apr.
The concept of literacy is relevant in many areas of life, both inside and out of the classroom. With science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) being fast-growing fields, STEM literacy in particular holds an important place in today's education system and beyond. While there is not a single definition for STEM literacy, it is impacted by possible assumptions educators make about students and the learning process. These assumptions are derived from many sources, including personal beliefs, past experiences, and learning theories that individuals utilize. This paper discusses the conceptualizations of STEM literacy and related limitations within three different learning theories: information processing, constructivism, and sociocultural theory. A theoretical framework is then discussed that addresses these limitations and incorporates a sociopolitical lens on scientific literacy, for the sake of helping educators identify and adjust their own perceptions for the sake of better supporting students.
读写能力的概念在生活的许多领域都具有相关性,无论是在课堂内还是课堂外。随着科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)成为快速发展的领域,尤其是STEM素养在当今教育系统及其他领域都占据着重要地位。虽然对于STEM素养没有单一的定义,但它受到教育工作者对学生和学习过程可能存在的假设的影响。这些假设源自许多方面,包括个人信念、过去的经历以及个人所运用的学习理论。本文讨论了在三种不同学习理论(信息加工理论、建构主义理论和社会文化理论)下STEM素养的概念化及其相关局限性。接着讨论了一个理论框架,该框架解决了这些局限性,并将社会政治视角纳入科学素养,以帮助教育工作者识别并调整自己的观念,从而更好地支持学生。