Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program, Implementation Science, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
Behavioral and Policy Sciences Department, RAND, 20 Park Plaza, Suite 910, Boston, MA 02116, USA.
Transl Behav Med. 2024 Nov 16;14(11):643-652. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibae048.
Longstanding inequities in cancer prevention and control require novel approaches to improve evidence-based intervention implementation. Exploring and elevating the perspectives of cancer prevention and control practitioners working to advance health equity and equitably implement evidence-based interventions is an important yet underutilized step among researchers working in this space. The purpose of this study was to explore practitioners' perspectives of how health equity is defined and integrated into their work, challenges of advancing health equity for implementation in local settings, and associated strategies. We conducted virtual key informant interviews and focus groups with 16 US practitioners (e.g. clinicians, health administrators, public health professionals) in 2021-2022. Interviews and focus groups were audio recorded and transcribed. Data were coded using inductive content analysis and summarized into themes. Four major themes emerged: (i) how health equity is conceptualized as a process and outcome; (ii) need to shift equity mindsets; (iii) importance of community partnerships; (iv) organizational policies and strategies for fostering equity in implementation. Respondents noted the need for research and medical communities to learn about the importance and benefits of allowing communities to shape implementation to advance equity in the delivery of evidence-based interventions and outcomes. Additionally, respondents emphasized that institutional leaders should initiate changes regarding equitable implementation at the organizational- and system-levels. Respondents endorsed the need to address equity issues related to the implementation of cancer prevention and control programs, practices, and policies. Many findings can be applied beyond cancer prevention and control to support equitable implementation and outcomes more generally.
长期存在的癌症预防和控制方面的不平等现象要求我们采用新方法来改进基于证据的干预措施的实施。探索和提升致力于推进健康公平和公平实施基于证据的干预措施的癌症预防和控制从业者的观点,是在该领域工作的研究人员尚未充分利用的重要步骤。本研究旨在探讨从业者对健康公平的定义以及将其纳入工作中的看法、在当地环境中推进健康公平以实施干预措施所面临的挑战,以及相关策略。我们在 2021 年至 2022 年间,对 16 名美国从业者(如临床医生、卫生管理人员、公共卫生专业人员)进行了虚拟的关键知情人访谈和焦点小组讨论。访谈和焦点小组进行了录音并转录。数据使用归纳内容分析进行编码,并总结为主题。出现了四个主要主题:(i)健康公平如何被概念化为一个过程和结果;(ii)需要转变公平思维模式;(iii)社区伙伴关系的重要性;(iv)促进实施公平的组织政策和策略。受访者指出,研究和医疗界需要了解让社区参与塑造实施以推进基于证据的干预措施和结果的公平性的重要性和好处。此外,受访者强调,机构领导者应该在组织和系统层面上发起关于公平实施的变革。受访者认可解决与癌症预防和控制计划、实践和政策实施相关的公平问题的必要性。许多发现不仅可以应用于癌症预防和控制领域,还可以支持更广泛的公平实施和结果。