• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊柱减压和后路器械固定后的生物力学。

Biomechanics after spinal decompression and posterior instrumentation.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Spine Center Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.

Institute for Biomechanics, Balgrist Campus, ETH Zurich, Lengghalde 5, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):1876-1886. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07694-5. Epub 2023 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1007/s00586-023-07694-5
PMID:37093262
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to elucidate segmental range of motion (ROM) before and after common decompression and fusion procedures on the lumbar spine.

METHODS

ROM of fourteen fresh-frozen human cadaver lumbar segments (L1/2: 4, L3/4: 5, L5/S1: 5) was evaluated in six loading directions: flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), lateral shear (LS), anterior shear (AS), axial rotation (AR), and axial compression/distraction (AC). ROM was tested with and without posterior instrumentation under the following conditions: 1) native 2) after unilateral laminotomy, 3) after midline decompression, and 4) after nucleotomy.

RESULTS

Median native ROM was FE 6.8°, LB 5.6°, and AR 1.7°, AS 1.8 mm, LS 1.4 mm, AC 0.3 mm. Unilateral laminotomy significantly increased ROM by 6% (FE), 3% (LB), 12% (AR), 11% (AS), and 8% (LS). Midline decompression significantly increased these numbers to 15%, 5%, 21%, 20%, and 19%, respectively. Nucleotomy further increased ROM in all directions, most substantially in AC of 153%. Pedicle screw fixation led to ROM decreases of 82% in FE, 72% in LB, 42% in AR, 31% in AS, and 17% in LS. In instrumented segments, decompression only irrelevantly affected ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

The amount of posterior decompression significantly impacts ROM of the lumbar spine. The here performed biomechanical study allows creation of a simplified rule of thumb: Increases in segmental ROM of approximately 10%, 20%, and 50% can be expected after unilateral laminotomy, midline decompression, and nucleotomy, respectively. Instrumentation decreases ROM by approximately 80% in bending moments and accompanied decompression procedures only minorly destabilize the instrumentation construct.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在阐明腰椎常见减压融合术后节段活动范围(ROM)。

方法

对 14 个新鲜冷冻人体腰椎节段(L1/2:4,L3/4:5,L5/S1:5)的 ROM 进行了评估,评估方向有六个:屈伸(FE)、侧屈(LB)、侧方剪切(LS)、前剪切(AS)、轴向旋转(AR)和轴向压缩/拉伸(AC)。ROM 在以下条件下进行了测试,分别有无后路器械固定:1)正常状态;2)单侧椎板切开术后;3)正中减压后;4)髓核切除术后。

结果

中位正常 ROM 为 FE 6.8°,LB 5.6°,AR 1.7°,AS 1.8mm,LS 1.4mm,AC 0.3mm。单侧椎板切开术使 ROM 增加了 6%(FE)、3%(LB)、12%(AR)、11%(AS)和 8%(LS)。正中减压术使这些数值分别增加到 15%、5%、21%、20%和 19%。髓核切除术后进一步增加了所有方向的 ROM,其中 AC 增加了 153%。椎弓根螺钉固定使 FE 减少了 82%,LB 减少了 72%,AR 减少了 42%,AS 减少了 31%,LS 减少了 17%。在器械固定的节段中,减压仅对 ROM 产生轻微影响。

结论

后路减压的程度对腰椎 ROM 有显著影响。本生物力学研究可制定一条简化的经验法则:单侧椎板切开术、正中减压术和髓核切除术分别可使节段 ROM 增加约 10%、20%和 50%。器械固定使 ROM 减少约 80%,同时伴随减压的处理仅会轻微破坏器械的稳定性。

相似文献

1
Biomechanics after spinal decompression and posterior instrumentation.脊柱减压和后路器械固定后的生物力学。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):1876-1886. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07694-5. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
2
Posterior spinal instrumentation and decompression with or without cross-link?后路脊柱内固定及减压术(是否使用横向连接装置)?
N Am Spine Soc J. 2021 Nov 17;8:100093. doi: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2021.100093. eCollection 2021 Dec.
3
Residual motion of cortical versus pedicle screw constructs after decompression, interbody fusion and cross-link augmentation.减压、椎间融合及交联增强术后皮质骨螺钉与椎弓根螺钉结构的残余运动
Eur Spine J. 2023 Apr;32(4):1401-1410. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07596-6. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
4
The biomechanical effect of single-level laminectomy and posterior instrumentation on spinal stability in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: a human cadaveric study.单节段椎板切除术和后路内固定对退变性腰椎侧凸脊柱稳定性的生物力学影响:一项人体尸体研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E15. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS1911.
5
Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.棘突间固定装置(ISD)在腰椎融合构建物中的特性:一项生物力学研究。
Spine J. 2013 May;13(5):572-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.01.042. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
6
Residual motion of different posterior instrumentation and interbody fusion constructs.不同后路内固定和椎间融合结构的残余运动。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Apr;32(4):1411-1420. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07597-5. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
7
Non-fusion instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a hinged pedicle screw rod system: an in vitro experiment.腰椎带铰链椎弓根螺钉棒系统的非融合器械固定:一项体外实验
Eur Spine J. 2009 Oct;18(10):1478-85. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1052-3. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
8
The effect of various options for decompression of degenerated lumbar spine motion segments on the range of motion: a biomechanical in vitro study.退变腰椎运动节段不同减压方式对活动度的影响:一项体外生物力学研究
Eur Spine J. 2023 Apr;32(4):1358-1366. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07587-7. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
9
Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.经骶骨旁尾骨固定术的生物力学评估
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Feb;21(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180577242.
10
Biomechanics of the lower thoracic spine after decompression and fusion: a cadaveric analysis.减压融合术后下胸椎的生物力学:尸体分析
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):2216-23. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.026. Epub 2014 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Nationwide analysis of spinal surgery in Japan from 1994 to 2021.1994年至2021年日本脊柱手术的全国性分析。
Eur Spine J. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08999-3.
2
Effects of dynamic stabilization and fusion on postoperative paraspinal muscle degeneration and lumbar function recovery.动态稳定术与融合术对术后椎旁肌退变及腰椎功能恢复的影响
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 30;20(1):552. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05837-6.
3
Impact of iatrogenic alterations on adjacent segment degeneration after lumbar fusion surgery: a systematic review.

本文引用的文献

1
Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯减压与减压融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):1054-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07507-1. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
2
Factors associated with an increased risk of developing postoperative symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis after decompression surgery: an explorative two-centre international cohort study.与减压手术后发生术后症状性腰椎滑脱症风险增加相关的因素:一项探索性的、两中心国际队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Feb;32(2):462-474. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07403-8. Epub 2022 Oct 29.
3
腰椎融合术后医源性改变对相邻节段退变的影响:一项系统综述
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Apr 29;20(1):425. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05561-1.
4
The importance of the posterior osteoligamentous complex of the lumbar spine: dogma changing biomechanical insights.腰椎后柱骨韧带复合体的重要性:改变传统观念的生物力学见解
Eur Spine J. 2025 Feb 6. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08690-7.
5
Quantitative relationships between elastic modulus of rod and biomechanical properties of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element analysis.椎间融合器弹性模量与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合生物力学特性的定量关系:有限元分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025 Jan 7;12:1510597. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1510597. eCollection 2024.
6
Experimental ex vivo characterization of the biomechanical effects of laminectomy and posterior fixation of the lumbo-sacral spine.腰椎-骶椎椎板切除术及后路固定生物力学效应的体外实验表征
Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 3;14(1):30001. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80741-3.
7
Minimally invasive robotic-assisted lumbar laminectomy.微创机器人辅助腰椎椎板切除术
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Sep 27;5(9):809-817. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0066.R1.
8
One-hole split endoscope versus unilateral biportal endoscopy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective propensity score study.单孔分体式内镜与单侧双孔道内镜治疗腰椎管狭窄症的回顾性倾向评分研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 22;19(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04743-7.
9
Basivertebral nerve ablation with concurrent lumbar laminotomy.经腰椎板切开术同期行椎基底神经消融术。
BMJ Case Rep. 2024 Apr 4;17(4):e259695. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2024-259695.
10
Biomechanical response of decompression alone in lower grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis--A finite element analysis.单纯减压对低等级腰椎退行性滑脱症的生物力学反应——有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 1;19(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04681-4.
Biomechanics of Transforaminal Endoscopic Approaches.
经椎间孔内镜入路的生物力学
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2022 Dec 15;47(24):1753-1760. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004471. Epub 2022 Sep 7.
4
Incidence of Revision Surgery After Decompression With vs Without Fusion Among Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.退变性腰椎管狭窄症减压术后与未融合患者行翻修手术的发生率。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2223803. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.23803.
5
Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.退变性腰椎滑脱症的减压融合与非融合。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):526-538. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990.
6
3D printed clamps for fixation of spinal segments in biomechanical testing.3D 打印夹具用于生物力学测试中脊柱节段的固定。
J Biomech. 2021 Aug 26;125:110577. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110577. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
7
Trends in lumbar spinal fusion-a literature review.腰椎融合术的发展趋势——文献综述
J Spine Surg. 2020 Dec;6(4):752-761. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-492.
8
Influence of double rods and interbody cages on quasistatic range of motion of the spine after lumbopelvic instrumentation.后路腰骶椎固定术后双棒和椎间融合器对脊柱准静态活动范围的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2020 Dec;29(12):2980-2989. doi: 10.1007/s00586-020-06594-2. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
9
Biomechanical contribution of spinal structures to stability of the lumbar spine-novel biomechanical insights.脊柱结构对腰椎稳定性的生物力学贡献——新的生物力学见解。
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1705-1716. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.05.541. Epub 2020 May 28.
10
Comparing rates of early pedicle screw loosening in posterolateral lumbar fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.比较经椎间孔腰椎体间融合与单纯后路腰椎融合术治疗后早期椎弓根螺钉松动的发生率。
Spine J. 2020 Sep;20(9):1438-1445. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 May 6.