• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于人工智能的社交媒体中他汀类药物相关话题和情绪的分析。

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of Statin-Related Topics and Sentiments on Social Media.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Department of Information Technology & Digital Innovation, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e239747. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9747.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9747
PMID:37093597
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10126874/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Despite compelling evidence that statins are safe, are generally well tolerated, and reduce cardiovascular events, statins are underused even in patients with the highest risk. Social media may provide contemporary insights into public perceptions about statins.

OBJECTIVE

To characterize and classify public perceptions about statins that were gleaned from more than a decade of statin-related discussions on Reddit, a widely used social media platform.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study analyzed all statin-related discussions on the social media platform that were dated between January 1, 2009, and July 12, 2022. Statin- and cholesterol-focused communities, were identified to create a list of statin-related discussions. An artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline was developed to cluster these discussions into specific topics and overarching thematic groups. The pipeline consisted of a semisupervised natural language processing model (BERT [Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers]), a dimensionality reduction technique, and a clustering algorithm. The sentiment for each discussion was labeled as positive, neutral, or negative using a pretrained BERT model.

EXPOSURES

Statin-related posts and comments containing the terms statin and cholesterol.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Statin-related topics and thematic groups.

RESULTS

A total of 10 233 unique statin-related discussions (961 posts and 9272 comments) from 5188 unique authors were identified. The number of statin-related discussions increased by a mean (SD) of 32.9% (41.1%) per year. A total of 100 discussion topics were identified and were classified into 6 overarching thematic groups: (1) ketogenic diets, diabetes, supplements, and statins; (2) statin adverse effects; (3) statin hesitancy; (4) clinical trial appraisals; (5) pharmaceutical industry bias and statins; and (6) red yeast rice and statins. The sentiment analysis revealed that most discussions had a neutral (66.6%) or negative (30.8%) sentiment.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this study demonstrated the potential of an AI approach to analyze large, contemporary, publicly available social media data and generate insights into public perceptions about statins. This information may help guide strategies for addressing barriers to statin use and adherence.

摘要

重要性

尽管有令人信服的证据表明他汀类药物是安全的,通常耐受性良好,并能降低心血管事件,但即使是在风险最高的患者中,他汀类药物的使用也不足。社交媒体可能提供了当代公众对他汀类药物看法的深入了解。

目的

从 Reddit 上十多年来与他汀类药物相关的讨论中,对他汀类药物的公众看法进行描述和分类,Reddit 是一个广泛使用的社交媒体平台。

设计、设置和参与者:本定性研究分析了 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 7 月 12 日期间在社交媒体平台上所有与他汀类药物相关的讨论。确定了他汀类药物和胆固醇相关的社区,以创建与他汀类药物相关的讨论列表。开发了一个人工智能 (AI) 管道,将这些讨论聚类为特定主题和总体主题组。该管道由一个半监督自然语言处理模型(BERT [来自 Transformers 的双向编码器表示])、降维技术和聚类算法组成。使用预先训练的 BERT 模型为每个讨论标记情绪为积极、中性或消极。

暴露

与他汀类药物相关的帖子和评论,其中包含他汀类药物和胆固醇这两个术语。

主要结果和措施

与他汀类药物相关的主题和主题组。

结果

共确定了 5188 名作者的 10233 个独特的与他汀类药物相关的讨论(961 个帖子和 9272 条评论)。与他汀类药物相关的讨论数量平均(SD)每年增加 32.9%(41.1%)。共确定了 100 个讨论主题,并将其分为 6 个总体主题组:(1)生酮饮食、糖尿病、补充剂和他汀类药物;(2)他汀类药物不良反应;(3)他汀类药物犹豫;(4)临床试验评估;(5)制药行业偏见和他汀类药物;(6)红曲米和他汀类药物。情感分析显示,大多数讨论的情绪为中性(66.6%)或负面(30.8%)。

结论和相关性

本研究结果表明,人工智能方法具有分析大型、当代、公开可用的社交媒体数据并生成公众对他汀类药物看法见解的潜力。这些信息可能有助于指导解决他汀类药物使用和依从性障碍的策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a413/10126874/ab07c56f3d8a/jamanetwopen-e239747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a413/10126874/f753ed95a3d7/jamanetwopen-e239747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a413/10126874/3063b593e20b/jamanetwopen-e239747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a413/10126874/ab07c56f3d8a/jamanetwopen-e239747-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a413/10126874/f753ed95a3d7/jamanetwopen-e239747-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a413/10126874/3063b593e20b/jamanetwopen-e239747-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a413/10126874/ab07c56f3d8a/jamanetwopen-e239747-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of Statin-Related Topics and Sentiments on Social Media.基于人工智能的社交媒体中他汀类药物相关话题和情绪的分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Apr 3;6(4):e239747. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9747.
2
Trends in Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Social Media Posts Using Artificial Intelligence.使用人工智能分析胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂社交媒体帖子的趋势
JACC Adv. 2024 Aug 28;3(9):101182. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101182. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Vaccine sentiment analysis using BERT + NBSVM and geo-spatial approaches.使用BERT + NBSVM和地理空间方法的疫苗情绪分析。
J Supercomput. 2023 May 7:1-31. doi: 10.1007/s11227-023-05319-8.
4
Contemporary attitudes and beliefs on coronary artery calcium from social media using artificial intelligence.利用人工智能从社交媒体看当代对冠状动脉钙化的态度和信念。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 30;7(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01077-w.
5
Assessment of Beliefs and Attitudes About Statins Posted on Twitter: A Qualitative Study.评估在推特上发布的关于他汀类药物的信念和态度:一项定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208953. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8953.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Examining the Prevailing Negative Sentiments Surrounding Measles Vaccination: Unsupervised Deep Learning of Twitter Posts from 2017 to 2022.探究麻疹疫苗接种相关负面情绪的流行:2017 年至 2022 年推特帖子的无监督深度学习。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2023 Aug;26(8):621-630. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2023.0025. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
8
Public Discourse and Sentiment Toward Dementia on Chinese Social Media: Machine Learning Analysis of Weibo Posts.中文社交媒体中公众对痴呆症的话语和情绪:微博帖子的机器学习分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 2;24(9):e39805. doi: 10.2196/39805.
9
Comparing Public Sentiment Toward COVID-19 Vaccines Across Canadian Cities: Analysis of Comments on Reddit.比较加拿大各城市民众对 COVID-19 疫苗的看法:对 Reddit 评论的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 24;23(9):e32685. doi: 10.2196/32685.
10
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of Public Attitudes on Facebook and Twitter Toward COVID-19 Vaccines in the United Kingdom and the United States: Observational Study.人工智能分析英美两国民众在脸书和推特上对 COVID-19 疫苗的态度:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 5;23(4):e26627. doi: 10.2196/26627.

引用本文的文献

1
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Statin Adherence: Insights from the All of Us Research Program.他汀类药物依从性方面的种族和族裔差异:来自“我们所有人”研究项目的见解。
medRxiv. 2025 Aug 28:2025.08.26.25334490. doi: 10.1101/2025.08.26.25334490.
2
Public perception and changing attitudes toward antidepressants over a decade in social media: Lessons learned from online discussion using artificial intelligence.社交媒体上公众对抗抑郁药物十年间的认知及态度变化:利用人工智能从在线讨论中汲取的经验教训
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 4;20(9):e0318464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318464. eCollection 2025.
3
Effect of a generative artificial intelligence digital scribe on pediatric provider documentation time, cognitive burden, and burnout.

本文引用的文献

1
COVID-19 Misinformation Detection: Machine-Learned Solutions to the Infodemic.新冠疫情错误信息检测:针对信息疫情的机器学习解决方案
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Aug 25;2(2):e38756. doi: 10.2196/38756. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.
2
Comparative Effects of Low-Dose Rosuvastatin, Placebo, and Dietary Supplements on Lipids and Inflammatory Biomarkers.低剂量瑞舒伐他汀、安慰剂及膳食补充剂对血脂和炎症生物标志物的比较作用
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Jan 3;81(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.10.013. Epub 2022 Nov 6.
3
Patient-Reported Reasons for Switching or Discontinuing Statin Therapy: A Mixed Methods Study Using Social Media.
生成式人工智能数字书记员对儿科医疗服务提供者的文档记录时间、认知负担和职业倦怠的影响。
JAMIA Open. 2025 Jul 3;8(4):ooaf068. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf068. eCollection 2025 Aug.
4
Reasons for non-acceptance of statin therapy by patients at high cardiovascular risk.心血管疾病高风险患者不接受他汀类药物治疗的原因。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 16;15(1):17014. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01930-2.
5
Patient-Centered Research Through Artificial Intelligence to Identify Priorities in Cancer Care.通过人工智能开展以患者为中心的研究,以确定癌症护理的重点。
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Apr 24. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2025.0694.
6
Artificial intelligence tools in supporting healthcare professionals for tailored patient care.支持医疗保健专业人员进行个性化患者护理的人工智能工具。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Apr 16;8(1):210. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01604-3.
7
Evolutionary Trend of Dental Health Care Information on Chinese Social Media Platforms During 2018-2022: Retrospective Observational Study.2018 - 2022年中国社交媒体平台上牙齿保健信息的演变趋势:回顾性观察研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Apr 10;5:e55065. doi: 10.2196/55065.
8
BCG therapy for bladder cancer: Exploring patient experiences and concerns through artificial intelligence-based social media analysis.卡介苗治疗膀胱癌:通过基于人工智能的社交媒体分析探索患者的经历与担忧
Bladder Cancer. 2024 Dec 23;10(4):290-299. doi: 10.1177/23523735241304907. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Industry Payments and Sentiments Toward Robotic Surgery Among US Physicians.美国医生对机器人手术的行业支付与看法
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2458552. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.58552.
10
Statin Use and Hyperglycemia: Do Statins Cause Diabetes?他汀类药物的使用与高血糖:他汀类药物会引发糖尿病吗?
Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2024 Dec 19;27(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s11883-024-01266-8.
患者报告转换或停止他汀类药物治疗的原因:使用社交媒体的混合方法研究。
Drug Saf. 2022 Sep;45(9):971-981. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01212-0. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
4
Language-agnostic deep learning framework for automatic monitoring of population-level mental health from social networks.从社交网络自动监测人群心理健康的通用语言深度学习框架。
J Biomed Inform. 2022 Sep;133:104145. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2022.104145. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
5
Classification of Twitter Vaping Discourse Using BERTweet: Comparative Deep Learning Study.使用BERTweet对推特上的电子烟话语进行分类:比较深度学习研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2022 Jul 21;10(7):e33678. doi: 10.2196/33678.
6
Deep Learning Analysis of Polish Electronic Health Records for Diagnosis Prediction in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases.用于心血管疾病患者诊断预测的波兰电子健康记录的深度学习分析
J Pers Med. 2022 May 25;12(6):869. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060869.
7
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.错误信息:易感性、传播以及让公众免疫的干预措施。
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):460-467. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
8
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.《心脏病与卒中统计-2022 更新:美国心脏协会报告》。
Circulation. 2022 Feb 22;145(8):e153-e639. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
9
Social Media and the Transformation of the Physician-Patient Relationship: Viewpoint.社交媒体与医患关系的转变:观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Dec 24;23(12):e25230. doi: 10.2196/25230.
10
Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Responses from Twitter Data.基于深度学习的从推特数据中分析 COVID-19 疫苗接种反应的情绪。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Dec 2;2021:4321131. doi: 10.1155/2021/4321131. eCollection 2021.