Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, Lübeck, Germany.
Microbiol Spectr. 2023 Jun 15;11(3):e0525422. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.05254-22. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
The human gut microbiome plays a vital role in health and disease. In particular, the first days of life provide a unique window of opportunity for development and establishment of microbial community. Currently, stool samples are known to be the most widely used sampling approach for studying the gut microbiome. However, complicated sample acquisition at certain time points, challenges in transportation, and patient discomfort underline the need for development of alternative sampling approaches. One of the alternatives is rectal swabs, shown to be a reliable proxy for gut microbiome analysis when obtained from adults. Here, we compare the usability of rectal swabs and meconium paired samples collected from infants on the first days of life. Our results indicate that the two sampling approaches display significantly distinct patterns in microbial composition and alpha and beta diversity as well as detection of resistance genes. Moreover, the dissimilarity between the two collection methods was greater than the interindividual variation. Therefore, we conclude that rectal swabs are not a reliable proxy compared to stool samples for gut microbiome analysis when collected on the first days of a newborn's life. Currently, there are numerous suggestions on how to ease the notoriously complex and error-prone methodological setups to study the gut microbiota of newborns during the first days of life. Especially, meconium samples are regularly failing to yield meaningful data output and therefore have been suggested to be replaced by rectal swabs as done in adults as well. We find this development toward a simplified method to be producing dramatically erroneous results, skewing data interpretation away from the real aspects to be considered for neonatal health during the first days of life. We have put together our knowledge on this critical aspect with careful consideration and identified the failure of rectal swabs to be a replacement for sampling of meconium in term-born newborns.
人类肠道微生物群在健康和疾病中起着至关重要的作用。特别是,生命的最初几天为微生物群落的发展和建立提供了一个独特的机会窗口。目前,粪便样本被认为是研究肠道微生物组最广泛使用的采样方法。然而,在某些时间点采集样本复杂、运输挑战以及患者不适等问题突显了开发替代采样方法的必要性。其中一种替代方法是直肠拭子,当从成年人获得时,它被证明是肠道微生物组分析的可靠替代方法。在这里,我们比较了生命最初几天从婴儿收集的直肠拭子和胎粪配对样本的可用性。我们的结果表明,这两种采样方法在微生物组成以及α和β多样性以及耐药基因检测方面显示出明显不同的模式。此外,两种采集方法之间的差异大于个体间的差异。因此,我们得出结论,与粪便样本相比,在新生儿生命的最初几天收集时,直肠拭子不是肠道微生物组分析的可靠替代方法。目前,有许多关于如何简化研究新生儿生命最初几天肠道微生物组的复杂且容易出错的方法学设置的建议。特别是,胎粪样本通常无法产生有意义的数据输出,因此有人建议像成年人一样用直肠拭子代替。我们发现,这种向简化方法的发展产生了非常错误的结果,使数据解释偏离了新生儿生命最初几天要考虑的实际方面。我们仔细考虑了这一关键方面的知识,并确定直肠拭子不能替代足月新生儿的胎粪采样。