The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.
Wuxi School of Medicine, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.
BMC Cancer. 2023 Apr 25;23(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10860-z.
Cancers harboring spliceosome mutations are highly sensitive to additional perturbations on the spliceosome that leads to the development of onco-therapeutics targeting the spliceosome and opens novel opportunities for managing aggressive tumors lacking effective treatment options such as triple negative breast cancers. Being the core spliceosome associated proteins, SNRPD1 and SNRPE have been both proposed as therapeutic targets for breast cancer management. Yet, their differences regarding their prognostic and therapeutic use as well as roles during carcinogenesis are largely unreported.
We conducted in silico analysis at gene expression and genetic levels to differentiate the clinical relevance of SNRPD1 and SNRPE, and explored their differential functionalities and molecular mechanistic associations with cancer in vitro.
We showed that high SNRPD1 gene expression was prognostic of poor breast cancer survival whereas SNRPE was not. The SNRPD1 expression quantitative trait loci, rs6733100, was found independently prognostic of breast cancer survival using TCGA data. Silencing either SNRPD1 or SNRPE independently suppressed the growth of breast cancer cells, but decreased migration was only observed in SNRPD1-silenced cells. Knocking down SNRPD1 but not SNRPE triggers doxorubicin resistance in triple negative breast cancer cells. Gene enrichment and network analyses revealed the dynamic regulatory role of SNRPD1 on cell cycle and genome stability, and the preventive role of SNRPE against cancer stemness that may neutralize its promotive role on cancer cell proliferation.
Our results differentiated the functionalities of SNRPD1 and SNRPE at both prognostic and therapeutic levels, and preliminarily explained the driving mechanism that requires additional explorations and validations.
含有剪接体突变的癌症对剪接体的额外干扰高度敏感,这导致了针对剪接体的抗肿瘤治疗药物的开发,并为缺乏有效治疗选择(如三阴性乳腺癌)的侵袭性肿瘤的管理开辟了新的机会。作为核心剪接体相关蛋白,SNRPD1 和 SNRPE 均被提议作为乳腺癌管理的治疗靶点。然而,它们在预后和治疗用途以及在癌变过程中的作用方面的差异在很大程度上尚未报道。
我们在基因表达和遗传水平上进行了计算机分析,以区分 SNRPD1 和 SNRPE 的临床相关性,并探索了它们在体外的不同功能和分子机制关联与癌症。
我们表明,高 SNRPD1 基因表达预示着乳腺癌预后不良,而 SNRPE 则不然。使用 TCGA 数据,发现 SNRPD1 表达数量性状基因座 rs6733100 独立预示着乳腺癌的生存。沉默 SNRPD1 或 SNRPE 中的任何一个都能独立抑制乳腺癌细胞的生长,但只有在 SNRPD1 沉默的细胞中才观察到迁移减少。敲低 SNRPD1 但不敲低 SNRPE 会导致三阴性乳腺癌细胞对阿霉素产生耐药性。基因富集和网络分析揭示了 SNRPD1 在细胞周期和基因组稳定性方面的动态调节作用,以及 SNRPE 对癌症干细胞的预防作用,这可能中和了其对癌细胞增殖的促进作用。
我们的研究结果在预后和治疗水平上区分了 SNRPD1 和 SNRPE 的功能,并初步解释了需要进一步探索和验证的驱动机制。