Kim Hyoungnae, Hyun Young Youl, Yun Hae-Ryong, Joo Young Su, Kim Yaeni, Jung Ji Yong, Jeong Jong Cheol, Kim Jayoun, Park Jung Tak, Yoo Tae-Hyun, Kang Shin-Wook, Oh Kook-Hwan, Han Seung Hyeok
Division of Nephrology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2023 Jul;42(4):501-511. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.22.158. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
The new Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations without a race coefficient have gained recognition across the United States. We aimed to test whether these new equations performed well in Korean patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).
This study included 2,149 patients with CKD G1-G5 without kidney replacement therapy from the Korean Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with CKD (KNOW-CKD). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the new CKD-EPI equations with serum creatinine and cystatin C. The primary outcome was 5-year risk of kidney failure with replacement therapy (KFRT).
When we adopted the new creatinine equation [eGFRcr (NEW)], 81 patients (23.1%) with CKD G3a based on the current creatinine equation (eGFRcr) were reclassified as CKD G2. Accordingly, the number of patients with eGFR of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 decreased from 1,393 (64.8%) to 1,312 (61.1%). The time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for 5-year KFRT risk was comparable between the eGFRcr (NEW) (0.941; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.922-0.960) and eGFRcr (0.941; 95% CI, 0.922-0.961). The eGFRcr (NEW) showed slightly better discrimination and reclassification than the eGFRcr. However, the new creatinine and cystatin C equation [eGFRcr-cys (NEW)] performed similarly to the current creatinine and cystatin C equation. Furthermore, eGFRcr-cys (NEW) did not show better performance for KFRT risk than eGFRcr (NEW).
Both the current and the new CKD-EPI equations showed excellent predictive performance for 5-year KFRT risk in Korean patients with CKD. These new equations need to be further tested for other clinical outcomes in Koreans.
新的慢性肾脏病流行病学合作组织(CKD-EPI)方程,即不含种族系数的方程,已在美国获得认可。我们旨在测试这些新方程在韩国慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中是否表现良好。
本研究纳入了来自韩国慢性肾脏病患者结局队列研究(KNOW-CKD)的2149例未接受肾脏替代治疗的CKD G1-G5期患者。使用新的CKD-EPI方程,根据血清肌酐和胱抑素C计算估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。主要结局是接受替代治疗的肾衰竭(KFRT)5年风险。
当采用新的肌酐方程[eGFRcr(NEW)]时,基于当前肌酐方程(eGFRcr)被判定为CKD G3a期的81例患者(23.1%)被重新分类为CKD G2期。因此,估算肾小球滤过率<60 mL/min/1.73 m2的患者数量从1393例(64.8%)降至1312例(61.1%)。eGFRcr(NEW)预测5年KFRT风险的受试者工作特征曲线下时间依赖性面积与eGFRcr相当(0.941;95%置信区间[CI],0.922-0.960)和eGFRcr(0.941;95%CI,0.922-0.961)。eGFRcr(NEW)在区分能力和重新分类方面比eGFRcr略好。然而,新的肌酐和胱抑素C方程[eGFRcr-cys(NEW)]的表现与当前的肌酐和胱抑素C方程相似。此外,eGFRcr-cys(NEW)在预测KFRT风险方面并不比eGFRcr(NEW)表现更好。
当前和新的CKD-EPI方程在预测韩国CKD患者5年KFRT风险方面均表现出出色的预测性能。这些新方程需要在韩国人群中针对其他临床结局进行进一步测试。