KwaZulu-Natal Research Innovation and Sequencing Platform (KRISP), Nelson R Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Centre for Epidemic Response and Innovation (CERI), School of Data Science and Computational Thinking, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 26;18(4):e0283219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283219. eCollection 2023.
The global pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 has increased the demand for scalable sequencing and diagnostic methods, especially for genomic surveillance. Although next-generation sequencing has enabled large-scale genomic surveillance, the ability to sequence SARS-CoV-2 in some settings has been limited by the cost of sequencing kits and the time-consuming preparations of sequencing libraries. We compared the sequencing outcomes, cost and turn-around times obtained using the standard Illumina DNA Prep kit protocol to three modified protocols with fewer clean-up steps and different reagent volumes (full volume, half volume, one-tenth volume). We processed a single run of 47 samples under each protocol and compared the yield and mean sequence coverage. The sequencing success rate and quality for the four different reactions were as follows: the full reaction was 98.2%, the one-tenth reaction was 98.0%, the full rapid reaction was 97.5% and the half-reaction, was 97.1%. As a result, uniformity of sequence quality indicated that libraries were not affected by the change in protocol. The cost of sequencing was reduced approximately seven-fold and the time taken to prepare the library was reduced from 6.5 hours to 3 hours. The sequencing results obtained using the miniaturised volumes showed comparability to the results obtained using full volumes as described by the manufacturer. The adaptation of the protocol represents a lower-cost, streamlined approach for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing, which can be used to produce genomic data quickly and more affordably, especially in resource-constrained settings.
由 SARS-CoV-2 引起的全球大流行增加了对可扩展测序和诊断方法的需求,特别是对基因组监测的需求。尽管下一代测序技术已经实现了大规模的基因组监测,但在某些情况下,由于测序试剂盒的成本和测序文库的繁琐准备,对 SARS-CoV-2 进行测序的能力受到限制。我们比较了使用标准 Illumina DNA Prep 试剂盒方案获得的测序结果、成本和周转时间,以及三种具有较少清洗步骤和不同试剂体积(全体积、半体积、十分之一体积)的改良方案。我们在每种方案下处理了 47 个样本的单个运行,并比较了产量和平均序列覆盖率。四种不同反应的测序成功率和质量如下:全反应为 98.2%,十分之一反应为 98.0%,全快速反应为 97.5%,半反应为 97.1%。因此,序列质量的均匀性表明文库不受方案变化的影响。测序成本降低了约七倍,文库制备时间从 6.5 小时缩短至 3 小时。使用微型化体积获得的测序结果与制造商描述的全体积结果具有可比性。该方案的适应性代表了一种成本更低、流程更简化的 SARS-CoV-2 测序方法,可用于快速且更经济实惠地生成基因组数据,特别是在资源有限的环境中。