Suppr超能文献

谁的模型?哪些表示?对 Wagner 的回应。

Whose models? Which representations? A response to Wagner.

机构信息

Psychology, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK.

Department of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2023 Nov 23;49(12):850-851. doi: 10.1136/jme-2023-108958.

Abstract

In we argued that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but different aspects of a situation. One of the consequences of this argument is that the requirement for or benefits of normative moral theorising in bioethics is undercut. In response, Wagner has argued that normative moral theories should be reconceived as models. Wagner's argument seems to be that once reconceived as models, the rationale for moral theorising, undercut by our arguments in will be re-established because we will see those moral-theories-now-rebranded-as-models as serving a role akin to the role models serve in some of the natural sciences. In this response to Wagner, we provide two arguments against Wagner's proposal. We call these arguments the Turner-Cicourel Challenge and the Question Begging Challenge.

摘要

在 中,我们认为医学和伦理思维模式在本质上没有区别,而是一种情况的不同方面。这一论点的结果之一是,生物伦理学中规范性道德理论的要求或好处被削弱了。对此,瓦格纳认为,规范性道德理论应该被重新构想为模型。瓦格纳的论点似乎是,一旦被重新构想为模型,我们在 中提出的、削弱道德理论基础的理由就会重新确立,因为我们将看到这些现在被重新贴上“模型”标签的道德理论在某种程度上类似于模型在某些自然科学中所起的作用。在对瓦格纳的回应中,我们提出了两个反对瓦格纳提议的论点。我们称这两个论点为特纳-西库雷尔挑战和循环论证挑战。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical theories as multiple models.伦理理论作为多种模型。
J Med Ethics. 2023 Jun;49(6):444-446. doi: 10.1136/jme-2022-108501. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
3
Where the ethical action also is: a response to Hardman and Hutchinson.伦理行为所在之处:对哈德曼和哈钦森的回应。
J Med Ethics. 2022 Nov;48(11):884-886. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2022-108135. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
4
Where the ethical action is.道德行为之所在。
J Med Ethics. 2021 Dec 24. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107925.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验