David Weatherall Building, School of Medicine, University of Keele, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK; Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK.
Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, London, UK.
Breast. 2023 Jun;69:410-416. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
This overview provides the historical perspective of external beam breast hypofractionation over the last 50 years. It highlights the serious harm suffered by patients with breast cancer in the 1970's and 1980's because of new hypofractionation regimens based on a theoretical radiobiology model being adopted into clinical practice to solve a resource issue without testing within clinical trials and without the essential radiotherapy quality assurance. It then describes the high-quality clinical trials comparing 3-week with 5-week standard of care regimens that were initiated based on a strong scientific rationale for hypofractionation in breast cancer. Today, there are still challenges with universal implementation of the results of these moderate hypofractionation studies, but there is now a substantial body of evidence to support 3-week breast radiotherapy with several large randomised trials still to report. The limit of breast hypofractionation is then explored and randomised trials investigating 1-week radiotherapy are described. This approach is now standard of care in many countries for whole or partial breast radiotherapy and chest wall radiotherapy without immediate reconstruction. It also has the advantage of reducing burden of treatment for patients and providing cost-effective care. Further research is needed to establish the safety and efficacy of 1-week breast locoregional radiotherapy and following immediate breast reconstruction. In addition, clinical studies are required to determine how a tumour bed boost for patients with breast cancer at higher risk of relapse can be incorporated simultaneously into a 1-week radiotherapy schedule. As such, the breast hypofractionation story is still unfolding.
这篇综述提供了过去 50 年来外部束乳房分割放疗的历史背景。它强调了 20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代乳腺癌患者所遭受的严重危害,当时新的分割放疗方案基于理论放射生物学模型,被应用于临床实践,以解决资源问题,而没有在临床试验中进行测试,也没有必要的放疗质量保证。然后,它描述了比较 3 周与 5 周标准护理方案的高质量临床试验,这些试验是基于乳腺癌分割放疗的强有力科学依据而启动的。如今,在普遍实施这些中度分割研究结果方面仍然存在挑战,但现在有大量证据支持乳腺癌 3 周放疗,还有几个大型随机试验仍在报告中。然后探讨了乳房分割放疗的局限性,并描述了正在研究 1 周放疗的随机试验。这种方法现在在许多国家已经成为全乳或部分乳房放疗和不立即重建的胸壁放疗的标准治疗方法。它还有减少患者治疗负担和提供具有成本效益的护理的优势。需要进一步的研究来确定 1 周乳房局部区域放疗的安全性和有效性,并在立即进行乳房重建后进行随访。此外,还需要临床研究来确定如何同时将肿瘤床加量放疗纳入 1 周放疗计划,以适用于复发风险较高的乳腺癌患者。因此,乳房分割放疗的故事仍在继续。