Rejeski Kai, Greco Raffaella, Onida Francesco, Sánchez-Ortega Isabel, Bonini Chiara, Sureda Anna, Gribben John G, Yakoub-Agha Ibrahim, Subklewe Marion
Department of Medicine III - Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany.
Unit of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Hemasphere. 2023 Apr 27;7(5):e889. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000889. eCollection 2023 May.
Hematological toxicity represents the most common grade ≥3 toxicity after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. However, its underlying pathophysiology is incompletely understood and its grading and management remains ill-defined. To inform the forthcoming European Hematology Association/European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EHA/EBMT) guidelines on the management of "immune effector cell-associated hematotoxicity" (ICAHT), we undertook a survey of experienced clinicians using an online survey focusing on (1) grading, (2) risk-stratification and diagnostic work-up, (3) short-term, and (4) long-term management of ICAHT. There were 81 survey respondents across 18 countries. A high degree of variability was noted for cytopenia grading in regards to depth, duration, and time from CAR-T infusion. The majority of experts favored pre-CAR-T bone marrow studies, especially in case of a high-risk profile. Most respondents felt that the work-up for patients with severe hematotoxicity should rule-out viral infections (96%), substrate deficiency (80%), or coincident sHLH/MAS (serum ferritin, 92%), and should include bone marrow aspiration (86%) and/or biopsy (61%). Clinicians were divided as to whether the occurrence of coincident immunotoxicity should influence the decision to apply G-CSF, and when to initiate G-CSF support. In case of prolonged thrombocytopenia, most survey participants favored thrombopoietin agonists (86%). Conversely, autologous hematopoietic cell boosts represented the preferred choice for neutropenia (63%), although they were frequently not available and no consensus was reached regarding the optimal trigger point. These findings underline the current heterogeneity of practice patterns regarding ICAHT and invite the development of consensus guidelines, which may harmonize grading, establish standard operating procedures for diagnosis, and set management guidelines.
血液学毒性是嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞疗法后最常见的≥3级毒性。然而,其潜在的病理生理学尚未完全了解,其分级和管理仍不明确。为了为即将出台的欧洲血液学协会/欧洲血液和骨髓移植学会(EHA/EBMT)关于“免疫效应细胞相关血液毒性”(ICAHT)管理的指南提供信息,我们对经验丰富的临床医生进行了一项在线调查,重点关注(1)分级、(2)风险分层和诊断检查、(3)ICAHT的短期管理以及(4)长期管理。来自18个国家的81名受访者参与了此次调查。在血细胞减少分级方面,在深度、持续时间和CAR-T输注后的时间方面存在高度变异性。大多数专家赞成在CAR-T治疗前进行骨髓检查,尤其是在高危情况下。大多数受访者认为,对严重血液毒性患者的检查应排除病毒感染(96%)、底物缺乏(80%)或合并的噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增生症/巨噬细胞活化综合征(血清铁蛋白,92%),并应包括骨髓穿刺(86%)和/或活检(61%)。临床医生对于合并免疫毒性的发生是否应影响应用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的决定以及何时开始G-CSF支持存在分歧。在血小板减少持续时间较长的情况下,大多数调查参与者赞成使用血小板生成素激动剂(86%)。相反,自体造血细胞增强是中性粒细胞减少症的首选(63%),尽管它们往往无法获得,并且在最佳触发点方面未达成共识。这些发现强调了目前ICAHT实践模式的异质性,并呼吁制定共识指南,这可能会统一分级、建立诊断标准操作程序并制定管理指南。