• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Next Infodemic: Abortion Misinformation.下一次信息疫情:堕胎错误信息。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 4;25:e42582. doi: 10.2196/42582.
2
People's knowledge of and attitudes toward abortion laws before and after the decision.决定前后人们对堕胎法的了解和态度。
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2023 Dec;31(1):2233794. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2023.2233794.
3
Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.罗诉韦德案之后,凯西案之后:一项“基本”权利的现状与未来。
Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.
4
: Navigating the New Quagmire and Its Impacts on Abortion and Reproductive Health Care.: 论新困境及其对堕胎和生殖保健的影响。
Health Educ Behav. 2022 Dec;49(6):924-928. doi: 10.1177/10901981221125430. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
5
Roe v Wade and the Threat to Fertility Care.罗诉韦德案与生育医疗面临的威胁。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Oct 1;140(4):557-559. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004928. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
6
The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.女性在堕胎法理学中的角色:从罗诉韦德案到凯西案及以后。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):309-19. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000431x.
7
Projected Implications of Overturning Roe v Wade on Abortion Training in U.S. Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Programs.罗诉韦德案被推翻对美国妇产科住院医师培训中堕胎培训的预计影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug 1;140(2):146-149. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004832. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
8
Overturning Roe v. Wade: consequences for midlife women's health and well-being.推翻罗诉韦德案:对中年女性健康与福祉的影响
Womens Midlife Health. 2023 Jan 6;9(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40695-022-00085-8.
9
Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.法院重申罗诉韦德案判决结果,但维持相关限制规定。
Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Jul-Aug;24(4):174-7, 185.
10
The state of abortion rights in the US.美国堕胎权状况。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Oct;159(1):324-329. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14392. Epub 2022 Aug 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Psychology in the Post-Dobbs Era: Navigating Clinical Practice, Research, and Advocacy in a Changing Sexual- and Reproductive-Health Landscape.多布斯案后的临床心理学:在不断变化的性与生殖健康格局中驾驭临床实践、研究与宣传工作
Clin Psychol Sci. 2025 Jun 27. doi: 10.1177/21677026251346150.
2
People seeking abortion care.寻求堕胎护理的人。
CMAJ. 2025 Jul 27;197(26):E759-E760. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.250372.
3
Have Others Had This Experience? A Qualitative Analysis of Posts on Self-Managed Abortion to US-Based Reddit Community.其他人有过这种经历吗?对美国Reddit社区关于自我管理堕胎帖子的定性分析。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2025 Jun;57(2):175-184. doi: 10.1111/psrh.70011. Epub 2025 May 30.
4
Infodemic Versus Viral Information Spread: Key Differences and Open Challenges.信息疫情与病毒式信息传播:关键差异与公开挑战
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 May 7;5:e57455. doi: 10.2196/57455.
5
A Health Professional Mentorship Platform to Improve Equitable Access to Abortion: Development, Usability, and Content Evaluation.一个改善堕胎公平可及性的卫生专业人员指导平台:开发、可用性和内容评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Feb 19;12:e63364. doi: 10.2196/63364.
6
Public Understanding of Risk and Benefit of Mifepristone: A Randomized Clinical Trial.公众对米非司酮风险与益处的认知:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2460236. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60236.
7
Enhancing young people's pregnancy loss and fertility awareness and knowledge via schools: a way forward.通过学校提高年轻人对流产和生育的认识及知识:前进之路。
Health Promot Int. 2025 Jan 17;40(1). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daae205.
8
Changes in Reproductive Health Information-Seeking Behaviors After the Dobbs Decision: Systematic Search of the Wikimedia Database.多布斯案裁决后生殖健康信息寻求行为的变化:维基媒体数据库的系统检索
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Dec 16;4:e64577. doi: 10.2196/64577.
9
Abortion access barriers shared in "r/abortion" after : a qualitative analysis of a Reddit community post- decision leak in 2022.2022年Reddit社区决定后泄密事件中“/r/堕胎”板块所分享的堕胎获取障碍:一项定性分析
Sex Reprod Health Matters. 2024 Dec;32(1):2426921. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2024.2426921. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
10
From genes to reproductive health: Immune cell influences on abortion.从基因到生殖健康:免疫细胞对流产的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 10;19(10):e0309088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309088. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Exploring Google Searches for Out-of-Clinic Medication Abortion in the United States During 2020: Infodemiology Approach Using Multiple Samples.2020年美国非诊所药物流产的谷歌搜索探索:使用多样本的信息流行病学方法
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 May 12;2(1):e33184. doi: 10.2196/33184. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
2
The double-edged sword of abortion regulations: Decreasing training opportunities while increasing knowledge requirements.堕胎法规的双刃剑:减少培训机会,同时提高知识要求。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2145104. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2022.2145104.
3
The ongoing crisis of abortion care education and training in the United States.美国堕胎护理教育和培训持续存在的危机。
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Dec 1;34(6):373-378. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000825.
4
Treating Cancer in Pregnant Patients After Roe v Wade Overturned.罗诉韦德案被推翻后对孕妇癌症患者的治疗。
JAMA. 2022 Nov 1;328(17):1674-1676. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.13668.
5
Internet Searches for Abortion Medications Following the Leaked Supreme Court of the United States Draft Ruling.美国最高法院泄露草案裁决后,互联网上对堕胎药物的搜索量增加。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Sep 1;182(9):1002-1004. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.2998.
6
How Abortion Bans Could Affect Care for Miscarriage and Infertility.堕胎禁令如何影响流产和不孕不育护理。
JAMA. 2022 Jul 26;328(4):318-320. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.11488.
7
Navigating Loss of Abortion Services - A Large Academic Medical Center Prepares for the Overturn of .应对堕胎服务的缺失——一家大型学术医疗中心为(某项法案)的推翻做准备 。 (注:原文最后“of”后面内容缺失,翻译只能根据现有内容尽量完整表达)
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 2;386(22):2061-2064. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2206246. Epub 2022 May 11.
8
Health Literacy, Equity, and Communication in the COVID-19 Era of Misinformation: Emergence of Health Information Professionals in Infodemic Management.新冠疫情虚假信息时代的健康素养、公平性与沟通:健康信息专业人员在信息疫情管理中的崭露头角
JMIR Infodemiology. 2022 Apr 28;2(1):e35014. doi: 10.2196/35014. eCollection 2022 Jan-Jun.
9
Understanding Vaccine Hesitancy in the Context of COVID-19: The Role of Trust and Confidence in a Seventeen-Country Survey.理解 COVID-19 背景下的疫苗犹豫:在十七国调查中信任和信心的作用。
Int J Public Health. 2021 May 14;66:636255. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2021.636255. eCollection 2021.
10
Vigilante Injustice - Deputizing and Weaponizing the Public to Stop Abortions.义务警员的不公正行为——授权并武装公众以阻止堕胎。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1441-1443. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2114886. Epub 2021 Sep 22.

下一次信息疫情:堕胎错误信息。

The Next Infodemic: Abortion Misinformation.

机构信息

UConn Center for mHealth and Social Media, UConn Institute for Collaboration in Health, Interventions, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.

Department of Allied Health Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 4;25:e42582. doi: 10.2196/42582.

DOI:10.2196/42582
PMID:37140975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10196890/
Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines an infodemic as the proliferation of false or misleading information that leads to confusion, mistrust in health authorities, and the rejection of public health recommendations. The devastating impacts of an infodemic on public health were felt during the COVID-19 pandemic. We are now on the precipice of another infodemic, this one regarding abortion. On June 24, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization resulted in the reversal of Roe v. Wade, which had protected a woman's right to have an abortion for nearly 50 years. The reversal of Roe v. Wade has given way to an abortion infodemic that is being exacerbated by a confusing and rapidly changing legislative landscape, the proliferation of abortion disinformants on the web, lax efforts by social media companies to abate abortion misinformation, and proposed legislation that threatens to prohibit the distribution of evidence-based abortion information. The abortion infodemic threatens to worsen the detrimental effects of the Roe v. Wade reversal on maternal morbidity and mortality. It also comes with unique barriers to traditional abatement efforts. In this piece, we lay out these challenges and urgently call for a public health research agenda on the abortion infodemic to stimulate the development of evidence-based public health efforts to mitigate the impact of misinformation on the increased maternal morbidity and mortality that is expected to result from abortion restrictions, particularly among marginalized populations.

摘要

世界卫生组织(WHO)将信息疫情定义为虚假或误导性信息的扩散,这些信息会导致混淆、对卫生当局的不信任以及对公共卫生建议的拒绝。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,信息疫情对公共卫生造成了破坏性影响。我们现在正处于另一场信息疫情的边缘,这场疫情涉及堕胎。2022 年 6 月 24 日,美国最高法院(SCOTUS)在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案中的裁决推翻了罗诉韦德案,该裁决保护了妇女近 50 年的堕胎权利。罗诉韦德案的推翻引发了堕胎信息疫情,这一疫情因立法格局混乱、网络上堕胎虚假信息的泛滥、社交媒体公司在减轻堕胎错误信息方面的松懈努力以及威胁禁止分发循证堕胎信息的立法而加剧。堕胎信息疫情有可能加剧罗诉韦德案推翻对产妇发病率和死亡率的不利影响。它还带来了传统缓解措施的独特障碍。在这篇文章中,我们列出了这些挑战,并紧急呼吁制定关于堕胎信息疫情的公共卫生研究议程,以促进制定循证公共卫生措施,减轻错误信息对预计因堕胎限制而增加的产妇发病率和死亡率的影响,特别是在边缘化人群中。